13.07.2019 Views

SUMMER 2019

Distributor's Link Magazine Summer 2019 / Vol 42 No3

Distributor's Link Magazine Summer 2019 / Vol 42 No3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

138<br />

THE DISTRIBUTOR’S LINK<br />

JIM TRUESDELL OVERTIME THRESHOLDS IN CROSSHAIRS AGAIN from page 36<br />

In setting pay levels under the new rules, management<br />

is allowed to use incentive programs and nondiscretionary<br />

bonuses which make up to ten per cent of a worker’s<br />

total compensation. The old Obama proposal would<br />

have provided for periodic inflationary upgrades of the<br />

levels but this is not the case in the current proposal.<br />

There is a commitment to periodic review, but no specific<br />

guarantee of increases. In fact, future changes would<br />

again require a notice and comment procedure. Overtime<br />

protections remain in place for critical public safety<br />

employees to ensure there is no disruption when those<br />

workers are called upon to put in long hours in the event<br />

of emergencies. With salaries starting to rise and the job<br />

market experiencing what are, in some cases, severe<br />

worker shortages, it is clear that taking a hard line on<br />

compensating hard working employees is not only an<br />

unpopular stand but an unwise one too. Companies are<br />

competing for talent to keep their businesses operating.<br />

The Secretary of Labor, Alexander Acosta, has pointed to<br />

his previous support for an upward revision and believes<br />

now is the time to implement a reasonable change. It<br />

would seem that most businesses are ready to accept<br />

this and do see the need for it. But this is a far cry from<br />

the radical disruption of compensation programs which<br />

the 2016 rule caused as companies sought ways of<br />

dealing with it just prior to its deadline.<br />

It’s not just what the law requires as a minimum. A<br />

conscientious and fair employer will not want to ask his or<br />

her best employees to work long hours supervising other<br />

people who are getting extra pay without seeing that the<br />

supervisor himself or herself makes some extra money.<br />

After all, they are losing some private and family time while<br />

watching over the employer’s interests. Young managers<br />

want to get ahead and they will often go the extra mile to<br />

stand out and show what they can do. But management<br />

can take unfair advantage of this zealousness and<br />

there is no guarantee that the long hours and effort will<br />

necessarily be rewarded if profits and results do not allow<br />

for ample bonuses, commissions, and other rewards. It’s<br />

just the right thing to do, as well as good business, to see<br />

that these people are fairly compensated. The new DOL<br />

proposal is not a draconian edict placing an unfair burden<br />

on business. We should all support this move. In addition<br />

to being the correct moral choice, it may forestall any<br />

politically motivated massive wage hike which businesses<br />

will not easily be able to absorb!<br />

JIM TRUESDELL<br />

SPHERE 1 20TH ANNUAL MEETING & CONFERENCE<br />

MARCO ISLAND, FL - MAY 13-16, <strong>2019</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!