19.07.2019 Views

BollywoodFAQ_galley

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dadasaheb Phalke and the Birth of Indian Cinema<br />

29<br />

entrepreneurs in all walks of life. It was in this climate of an all-inclusive<br />

swadeshi movement that inspired Phalke to make “films on Indian subjects by<br />

the Indians, for the Indians.” Phalke, in his forties, left a comfortable government<br />

job to attempt a new career of which he had no knowledge, beyond an<br />

all-consuming passion and a motivation reflective of the super-charged times.<br />

The self-taught Phalke even refused lucrative offers by London-based producers<br />

to work in the U.K., at a princely sum of 300 pounds a month, following<br />

the enthusiastic reception of his first set of films on a screening visit to London<br />

in 1917. He had instead opted to struggle with an unpredictable career at home,<br />

attempting to nurture and establish what he then saw as a still-fledgling<br />

swadeshi (Indian) film industry. Perhaps it was this uncompromising equating<br />

of swadeshi with Indian-only stories and storytelling styles that Phalke’s<br />

choice of feature film subjects never went beyond the epic and Sanskrit drama<br />

sources, even when popular taste had begun veering towards other themes<br />

and genres, like the Parsi theater-inspired fantasy films, or family socials<br />

and comedies inspired by Shakespearean dramas and European films, this<br />

despite the fact that Phalke had played few minor Shakespearean characters<br />

in his earlier tryst with professional theater as a student actor. Also, given<br />

the unavailability of female actors agreeing to act onscreen, Phalke preferred<br />

casting young Indian boys in women’s parts (as was prevalent in many local<br />

Indian dance and theater traditions), instead of casting British, Anglo-Indian,<br />

or Western actresses with Indian screen names as Indian characters, as was<br />

common in Indian films of the silent era.<br />

Phalke’s selections and motivations went far beyond the personal. He saw<br />

the establishment of an Indian film industry as a pioneer’s responsibility,<br />

even if it came at the cost of his survival, sanity, and financial security. He was<br />

driven by a firm and spirited conviction that “the Indian people would get an<br />

occasion to see Indian images on the screen and people abroad would get a<br />

true picture of India.”<br />

The Phalke Film Shastra<br />

Phalke’s idea of swadeshi was not limited to telling Indian stories with an<br />

Indian-only cast and crew. It was also about re-introducing his creative fraternity<br />

and successors to the traditional Indian style of storytelling and performance,<br />

and its appreciation as postulated in the Nātyaśāstra (the Indian<br />

classical Sanskrit text on drama). Despite a decline in public performances of<br />

Sanskrit-language dramas in the medieval century, critics and commentators<br />

consistently engaged with the Nātyaśāstra as a dramatic treatise.<br />

Phalke’s exhaustive oeuvre of more than one hundred films sourced all<br />

its stories from the puranas, the Ramayana, Mahabharata, and the Sanskrit

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!