19.07.2019 Views

BollywoodFAQ_galley

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Rise of Bombay Cinema<br />

35<br />

On the structural front, Phalke—a student, teacher, and performer of the<br />

Sanskrit drama, or the Nātyaśāstra—was heavily influenced by its guidelines<br />

regarding conception and presentation. These ranged from the choice of subjects,<br />

the look of the actors, and the nature of storytelling—and always with the<br />

intent of elevating film as an art form. The Sanskrit drama tradition is evident<br />

by the integral role of the song-and-dance interlude as a narrative tool; the<br />

need to evoke multiple emotions (or the navarasas); and the importance of the<br />

happy ending, wherein good always contains, reforms, or eliminates evil. Such<br />

“ideal” drama has, consciously and subconsciously, influenced Indian films<br />

to uphold moral virtues through righteous protagonists, conveying readily<br />

understood messages presented in an entertaining manner.<br />

The major difference between the Indian studio system and its Hollywood<br />

counterpart was its vertical line of decision making, with one person at the<br />

top, contrary to the latter’s horizontal approach. Even in the case of a “limited<br />

company” studio like Bombay Talkies, all decisions were made by its founder,<br />

Himanshu Rai. Film journalist and scriptwriter K. A. Abbas notes in the May<br />

1939 issue of FilmIndia: “Few persons have any idea of the amount of work<br />

he does—from the writing of the scenario and dialogue to the printing of<br />

publicity posters, there is nothing to which he does not give his personal attention.<br />

Indeed, I feel he does too much work and in his own interests and in the<br />

interests of the studio he should share it with others.”<br />

Thus, the Auteur Theory had arrived in Indian cinema decades before the<br />

debating of the term by critics André Bazin and Andrew Sarris in the 1940s<br />

in France and the United States, respectively. In the studio era (1913–1947),<br />

that auteur was the producer, who often doubled as the film’s director, not<br />

unlike Phalke and his immediate successors. As studio heads took a backseat<br />

creatively, and eminent directors started working for studios based on<br />

the individual appeal of projects, it was they who became the auteurs. By<br />

the end of the 1950s, following the closure of most early-talkie era studios, a<br />

star-driven filmmaking system financed by independent producers emerged,<br />

with film projects increasingly planned around the image and individual<br />

genre-specific appeal of its stars. That’s when the reign of the stars began to<br />

consolidate the role of a film’s hero (and, on fewer occasions, the heroine), as<br />

the film’s primary attraction.<br />

Pioneering Studios and Visionary Filmmakers<br />

Bombay became associated with the filmmaking destiny of the Indian nation<br />

when Phalke made his first film in the city in 1913, as a cottage industry venture<br />

under the Phalke Films Company. The film was literally made at home,<br />

with his kitchen doubling as his development lab, and his wife, Saraswatibai

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!