Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FEATURE<br />
disadvantage at all for the production<br />
bike – in fact it was a<br />
big help because with smaller<br />
units you get better gas flow<br />
and better rideability – but it<br />
always limited us in top power<br />
to enter WorldSBK.”<br />
“There was a new version with<br />
new throttle bodies in the<br />
prototype stage, which at the<br />
time did 215hp, not too bad<br />
but we never got the release<br />
to switch it into production<br />
and have the proper base for<br />
world superbike racing,” he<br />
adds. “It was simply a<br />
company strategic decision in<br />
2011 to go Grand Prix racing<br />
instead of WorldSBK because<br />
we could not do both…and<br />
it was the right decision. We<br />
were always very busy and<br />
were a small group so there<br />
was not too much time to be<br />
disappointed that we did not<br />
see the RC8 in World Superbike.”<br />
As a track asset the RC8 had<br />
limited use, but surely there<br />
was a case for keeping it in<br />
the KTM portfolio? In the end<br />
the project fell foul of other<br />
priorities and the allocation<br />
of resources. “I cannot really<br />
answer the question as to why<br />
the RC8 is not here anymore<br />
but I can give a few points<br />
of view. KTM always ran an<br />
economic growth policy, so<br />
you had the small displacement<br />
Indian bikes coming<br />
along, the new Super Duke<br />
and many other projects.<br />
I think KTM simply had to<br />
choose where to put our R&D<br />
efforts and a Super Duke or a<br />
smaller Duke brings in more<br />
money and is more strategically<br />
important than an RC8.