30.10.2019 Views

On Track Off Road No. 192

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FEATURE<br />

disadvantage at all for the production<br />

bike – in fact it was a<br />

big help because with smaller<br />

units you get better gas flow<br />

and better rideability – but it<br />

always limited us in top power<br />

to enter WorldSBK.”<br />

“There was a new version with<br />

new throttle bodies in the<br />

prototype stage, which at the<br />

time did 215hp, not too bad<br />

but we never got the release<br />

to switch it into production<br />

and have the proper base for<br />

world superbike racing,” he<br />

adds. “It was simply a<br />

company strategic decision in<br />

2011 to go Grand Prix racing<br />

instead of WorldSBK because<br />

we could not do both…and<br />

it was the right decision. We<br />

were always very busy and<br />

were a small group so there<br />

was not too much time to be<br />

disappointed that we did not<br />

see the RC8 in World Superbike.”<br />

As a track asset the RC8 had<br />

limited use, but surely there<br />

was a case for keeping it in<br />

the KTM portfolio? In the end<br />

the project fell foul of other<br />

priorities and the allocation<br />

of resources. “I cannot really<br />

answer the question as to why<br />

the RC8 is not here anymore<br />

but I can give a few points<br />

of view. KTM always ran an<br />

economic growth policy, so<br />

you had the small displacement<br />

Indian bikes coming<br />

along, the new Super Duke<br />

and many other projects.<br />

I think KTM simply had to<br />

choose where to put our R&D<br />

efforts and a Super Duke or a<br />

smaller Duke brings in more<br />

money and is more strategically<br />

important than an RC8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!