Mountain Times - Volume 48, Number 24: June 12-18, 2019
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The <strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Times</strong> • <strong>June</strong> <strong>12</strong>-<strong>18</strong>, <strong>2019</strong> JUMPS • 33<br />
Veto:<br />
Gov. Scott chooses mental healt services, gun waiting period over gun waiting period<br />
continued from page 6<br />
“I don’t think the governor is going to get back<br />
the well-wishes of the NRA over this one,” Sears said<br />
Monday evening, referring the gun rights supporters<br />
who protested Scott’s signing of firearms restrictions<br />
in April 20<strong>18</strong>. “I don’t think they’ll jump up and down<br />
given what he signed last year.”<br />
Bill Moore, the firearm policy analyst for the<br />
Vermont Traditions Coalitions, who opposed the<br />
waiting period in the Legislature said Monday<br />
“I AM UPSET,” SAID CLAI LASHER-SOMMERS, EXECUTIVE<br />
DIRECTOR OF GUNSENSE VERMONT. “I FEEL LIKE HE<br />
DID NOT LISTEN TO, OR LOOK AT, THE DATA CLEARLY.<br />
THERE IS NO WAY THAT WE WILL STOP.”<br />
evening he agreed with Scott that the waiting period<br />
wasn’t good policy.<br />
“We agree that it’s ineffective … [in addressing]<br />
the questions regarding suicide regarding access to<br />
firearms and means for suicide, that it wouldn’t have<br />
done anything but really restrict people’s access to<br />
self protection,” he said.<br />
But instead of praising the governor for his<br />
decision, he criticized the governor for signing last<br />
year’s sweeping package of gun control bills.<br />
“Where was he last year?” Moore said. “Where was<br />
the governor’s concern for balancing rights vs. good<br />
policy to protect Vermonters last year when he signed<br />
the magazine ban?”<br />
Clai Lasher-Sommers, executive director of<br />
GunSense Vermont, which backed the waiting period<br />
measure, said she was surprised the governor vetoed<br />
the legislation.<br />
“I am upset,” she said. “I feel like he did not listen<br />
to, or look at, the data clearly.”<br />
Lasher-Sommers added, “There is no way that we<br />
will stop.”<br />
The waiting period proposal gained momentum<br />
early this year, after Alyssa and Rob Black, a couple<br />
from Essex, called on the Legislature to enact a<br />
gun purchase waiting period in the obituary they<br />
wrote for their son,<br />
Andrew. Andrew Black died of a self-inflicted<br />
gunshot wound in December.<br />
The Blacks said they were “deeply disappointed”<br />
by the governor’s veto in a statement sent to the<br />
media Monday evening. “We all now understand that<br />
suicide is most often an impulsive act, including the<br />
Governor,” the statement added. “He was provided<br />
with the same information that both the House and<br />
Senate were provided with. They created a thoughtful<br />
compromise. It is disappointing he went political.”<br />
The Blacks also<br />
said they were<br />
grateful for the<br />
support the measure<br />
received in the<br />
Legislature.<br />
“While we know<br />
this bill would not<br />
save everyone, by<br />
disrupting access to the most lethal method, it would<br />
have saved some,” the couple’s statement added.<br />
“This bill would have saved our son, it could have<br />
saved yours.”<br />
The Blacks said they would keep pushing for a<br />
“reasonable” waiting period. “We will continue our<br />
work until Vermont has a Governor that will sign this<br />
measure,” the statement read.<br />
Signs abortion bill<br />
The governor’s decision<br />
to sign H.57 means Vermont<br />
law, currently silent on<br />
abortion, will now have<br />
some of the broadest<br />
protections in the country.<br />
“Like many Vermonters, I<br />
have consistently supported<br />
a woman’s right to choose,<br />
which is why today I signed<br />
H.57 into law,” Scott wrote in Monday’s statement.<br />
“This legislation affirms what is already allowable<br />
in Vermont – protecting reproductive rights and<br />
ensuring those decisions remain between a woman<br />
and her health care provider. I know this issue can<br />
be polarizing, so I appreciate the respectful tone and<br />
civility from all sides throughout this discussion.”<br />
Rep. Pattie McCoy, R-Poultney, the House minority<br />
leader, was among the House Republicans who said<br />
the bill was too expansive because it failed to set any<br />
limits on when an abortion can be carried out or add<br />
extra regulations for teenagers.<br />
“From my take on it, it doesn’t have as many<br />
bumpers as I would have liked to see on the bill,”<br />
McCoy said, adding that many in the Republican<br />
Party would be disappointed.<br />
“I think we have a lot of individuals who are pro<br />
life in the Republican Party so I’m sure it will be<br />
upsetting for some, others would have liked him to<br />
pass without signing, but once again we are not the<br />
governor,” she added. “We voiced our concerns when<br />
we had the bill on the floor.”<br />
The Vermont Right to Life Committee, a leading<br />
anti-abortion group, released a statement Monday<br />
expressing it’s frustration with the governor.<br />
“By putting his signature on H. 57, Gov. Phil<br />
Scott endorses unlimited, unregulated abortion<br />
throughout all nine months of pregnancy,” said<br />
Mary Beerworth, the group’s executive director. “His<br />
signature signals his preference for protecting the<br />
business of abortion over other life-affirming options<br />
in Vermont statute.”<br />
Planned Parenthood of Northern New England<br />
issued a statement praising the actions of the House,<br />
Senate and the governor in supporting the “historic<br />
and common sense” legislation.<br />
“THIS LEGISLATION AFFIRMS WHAT IS ALREADY<br />
ALLOWABLE IN VERMONT – PROTECTING<br />
REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND ENSURING THOSE<br />
DECISIONS REMAIN BETWEEN A WOMAN AND<br />
HER HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.<br />
“Each and every day we see proof that abortion<br />
rights are on the line, and we cannot risk the threats<br />
to abortion access that we’re anticipating at the U.S.<br />
Supreme Court,” said Meagan Gallagher, president<br />
and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Northern New<br />
England. “We applaud Governor Scott for supporting<br />
reproductive rights and for taking action to preserve<br />
these rights in Vermont law.”<br />
Xander Landen contributed to this report.<br />
MOS: “When life begins” is moot when talking about the soul<br />
continued from page 28<br />
Money Matters: On social security<br />
continued from page 30<br />
that has accumulated in the past lives, and the experiences<br />
that will help it to evolve and grow closer to the Source in<br />
the upcoming incarnation.<br />
We can’t cover this subject in its entirety here, but the 16<br />
charts that precede the moment of birth, include what is<br />
known as a Ties Chart, or the T-Epoch of Ties, which occurs<br />
six-and-a-half months prior to birth. In the role of the eliminator,<br />
Pluto is the planet that governs this epoch. It is at or<br />
near the T-Chart that the Soul elects to stay or go, and where<br />
abortions or miscarriages occur.<br />
At about five months prior to the birth moment there is<br />
a chart for the A-Epoch of Animation. The Buddhists teach<br />
us that this is “The Quickening,” the moment in the gestation<br />
process where the fetal heart starts to beat, or the point<br />
where the soul commences to enter the physical vehicle.<br />
Anyone who has ever been pregnant knows that it is in the<br />
fourth month that the baby starts to kick. This ties in with<br />
“The Quickening,” and could be said to be the moment<br />
where the human being actually comes alive.<br />
Given the fact that the first chart in the series of prenatal<br />
charts is erected 11 months prior to the birth chart we<br />
could argue the point. Two months prior to conception<br />
the Soul enters the U-Epoch of Understanding. This marks<br />
the moment in time when the incoming soul portions off a<br />
piece of its psychic energy to form the etheric template for<br />
its lower consciousness in the mother’s womb. This could<br />
definitely be seen as the moment that life begins—but, who<br />
knows? Arguing about things gets us nowhere and becomes<br />
pointless when we are ignorant of the laws that govern life<br />
on Planet Earth.<br />
If the kids that I was eavesdropping upon had been<br />
better informed, instead of hassling each other over the<br />
question of “When is a human being officially considered<br />
to be alive?”, they could have been talking about the physics<br />
of reincarnation or having an interesting discussion<br />
about the complex series of choices that every Soul has to<br />
make before they make their formal entrance into the third<br />
dimension.<br />
It’s too bad none of us are allowed to access the books<br />
that are stored in the Vatican Library – and it’s too bad that<br />
our educational system is not designed to enlighten us<br />
or help us to penetrate the deeper mysteries. But, there is<br />
a ton of research that has gone into the study of prenatal<br />
astrology. If you delve deep enough what you find will blow<br />
your mind. If you are interested in finding out more about<br />
prenatal astrology, Charles Jayne’s “Preface to prenatal<br />
charts” is a good place to start. Let me leave you with that,<br />
pray that all of the above doesn’t rattle your pro life and pro<br />
choice cages too much, and invite you to take what you can<br />
from this week’s ‘scopes.<br />
Ways to stabilize the Social Security system, include:<br />
Increase payroll taxes: An increase in payroll taxes,<br />
depending on the size, could add years of life to the trust<br />
fund.<br />
Raise the retirement age: This has already been done<br />
in past reforms and would save money by paying benefits<br />
to future recipients at a later age.<br />
Tax Benefits of higher earners: By taxing Social Security<br />
income for retirees in higher tax brackets, the tax revenue<br />
could be used to lengthen the life of the trust fund.<br />
Modify inflation adjustments: Rather than raise benefits<br />
in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI), policymakers<br />
might elect to tie future benefit increases to the<br />
“chained CPI,” which assumes that individuals move to<br />
cheaper alternatives in the face of rising costs. Using the<br />
“chained CPI” may make cost of living adjustments less<br />
expensive.<br />
Reform is expected to be difficult since it may involve<br />
tough choices—something from which many policymakers<br />
often retreat. However, history has shown that<br />
political leaders tend to act when the consequences<br />
of inaction exceed those that would come from taking<br />
action.<br />
Kevin Theissen is the principal and financial advisor,<br />
of HWC Financial in Ludlow.