20.11.2019 Views

Mountain Times - Volume 48, Number 24: June 12-18, 2019

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The <strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Times</strong> • <strong>June</strong> <strong>12</strong>-<strong>18</strong>, <strong>2019</strong> JUMPS • 33<br />

Veto:<br />

Gov. Scott chooses mental healt services, gun waiting period over gun waiting period<br />

continued from page 6<br />

“I don’t think the governor is going to get back<br />

the well-wishes of the NRA over this one,” Sears said<br />

Monday evening, referring the gun rights supporters<br />

who protested Scott’s signing of firearms restrictions<br />

in April 20<strong>18</strong>. “I don’t think they’ll jump up and down<br />

given what he signed last year.”<br />

Bill Moore, the firearm policy analyst for the<br />

Vermont Traditions Coalitions, who opposed the<br />

waiting period in the Legislature said Monday<br />

“I AM UPSET,” SAID CLAI LASHER-SOMMERS, EXECUTIVE<br />

DIRECTOR OF GUNSENSE VERMONT. “I FEEL LIKE HE<br />

DID NOT LISTEN TO, OR LOOK AT, THE DATA CLEARLY.<br />

THERE IS NO WAY THAT WE WILL STOP.”<br />

evening he agreed with Scott that the waiting period<br />

wasn’t good policy.<br />

“We agree that it’s ineffective … [in addressing]<br />

the questions regarding suicide regarding access to<br />

firearms and means for suicide, that it wouldn’t have<br />

done anything but really restrict people’s access to<br />

self protection,” he said.<br />

But instead of praising the governor for his<br />

decision, he criticized the governor for signing last<br />

year’s sweeping package of gun control bills.<br />

“Where was he last year?” Moore said. “Where was<br />

the governor’s concern for balancing rights vs. good<br />

policy to protect Vermonters last year when he signed<br />

the magazine ban?”<br />

Clai Lasher-Sommers, executive director of<br />

GunSense Vermont, which backed the waiting period<br />

measure, said she was surprised the governor vetoed<br />

the legislation.<br />

“I am upset,” she said. “I feel like he did not listen<br />

to, or look at, the data clearly.”<br />

Lasher-Sommers added, “There is no way that we<br />

will stop.”<br />

The waiting period proposal gained momentum<br />

early this year, after Alyssa and Rob Black, a couple<br />

from Essex, called on the Legislature to enact a<br />

gun purchase waiting period in the obituary they<br />

wrote for their son,<br />

Andrew. Andrew Black died of a self-inflicted<br />

gunshot wound in December.<br />

The Blacks said they were “deeply disappointed”<br />

by the governor’s veto in a statement sent to the<br />

media Monday evening. “We all now understand that<br />

suicide is most often an impulsive act, including the<br />

Governor,” the statement added. “He was provided<br />

with the same information that both the House and<br />

Senate were provided with. They created a thoughtful<br />

compromise. It is disappointing he went political.”<br />

The Blacks also<br />

said they were<br />

grateful for the<br />

support the measure<br />

received in the<br />

Legislature.<br />

“While we know<br />

this bill would not<br />

save everyone, by<br />

disrupting access to the most lethal method, it would<br />

have saved some,” the couple’s statement added.<br />

“This bill would have saved our son, it could have<br />

saved yours.”<br />

The Blacks said they would keep pushing for a<br />

“reasonable” waiting period. “We will continue our<br />

work until Vermont has a Governor that will sign this<br />

measure,” the statement read.<br />

Signs abortion bill<br />

The governor’s decision<br />

to sign H.57 means Vermont<br />

law, currently silent on<br />

abortion, will now have<br />

some of the broadest<br />

protections in the country.<br />

“Like many Vermonters, I<br />

have consistently supported<br />

a woman’s right to choose,<br />

which is why today I signed<br />

H.57 into law,” Scott wrote in Monday’s statement.<br />

“This legislation affirms what is already allowable<br />

in Vermont – protecting reproductive rights and<br />

ensuring those decisions remain between a woman<br />

and her health care provider. I know this issue can<br />

be polarizing, so I appreciate the respectful tone and<br />

civility from all sides throughout this discussion.”<br />

Rep. Pattie McCoy, R-Poultney, the House minority<br />

leader, was among the House Republicans who said<br />

the bill was too expansive because it failed to set any<br />

limits on when an abortion can be carried out or add<br />

extra regulations for teenagers.<br />

“From my take on it, it doesn’t have as many<br />

bumpers as I would have liked to see on the bill,”<br />

McCoy said, adding that many in the Republican<br />

Party would be disappointed.<br />

“I think we have a lot of individuals who are pro<br />

life in the Republican Party so I’m sure it will be<br />

upsetting for some, others would have liked him to<br />

pass without signing, but once again we are not the<br />

governor,” she added. “We voiced our concerns when<br />

we had the bill on the floor.”<br />

The Vermont Right to Life Committee, a leading<br />

anti-abortion group, released a statement Monday<br />

expressing it’s frustration with the governor.<br />

“By putting his signature on H. 57, Gov. Phil<br />

Scott endorses unlimited, unregulated abortion<br />

throughout all nine months of pregnancy,” said<br />

Mary Beerworth, the group’s executive director. “His<br />

signature signals his preference for protecting the<br />

business of abortion over other life-affirming options<br />

in Vermont statute.”<br />

Planned Parenthood of Northern New England<br />

issued a statement praising the actions of the House,<br />

Senate and the governor in supporting the “historic<br />

and common sense” legislation.<br />

“THIS LEGISLATION AFFIRMS WHAT IS ALREADY<br />

ALLOWABLE IN VERMONT – PROTECTING<br />

REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND ENSURING THOSE<br />

DECISIONS REMAIN BETWEEN A WOMAN AND<br />

HER HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.<br />

“Each and every day we see proof that abortion<br />

rights are on the line, and we cannot risk the threats<br />

to abortion access that we’re anticipating at the U.S.<br />

Supreme Court,” said Meagan Gallagher, president<br />

and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Northern New<br />

England. “We applaud Governor Scott for supporting<br />

reproductive rights and for taking action to preserve<br />

these rights in Vermont law.”<br />

Xander Landen contributed to this report.<br />

MOS: “When life begins” is moot when talking about the soul<br />

continued from page 28<br />

Money Matters: On social security<br />

continued from page 30<br />

that has accumulated in the past lives, and the experiences<br />

that will help it to evolve and grow closer to the Source in<br />

the upcoming incarnation.<br />

We can’t cover this subject in its entirety here, but the 16<br />

charts that precede the moment of birth, include what is<br />

known as a Ties Chart, or the T-Epoch of Ties, which occurs<br />

six-and-a-half months prior to birth. In the role of the eliminator,<br />

Pluto is the planet that governs this epoch. It is at or<br />

near the T-Chart that the Soul elects to stay or go, and where<br />

abortions or miscarriages occur.<br />

At about five months prior to the birth moment there is<br />

a chart for the A-Epoch of Animation. The Buddhists teach<br />

us that this is “The Quickening,” the moment in the gestation<br />

process where the fetal heart starts to beat, or the point<br />

where the soul commences to enter the physical vehicle.<br />

Anyone who has ever been pregnant knows that it is in the<br />

fourth month that the baby starts to kick. This ties in with<br />

“The Quickening,” and could be said to be the moment<br />

where the human being actually comes alive.<br />

Given the fact that the first chart in the series of prenatal<br />

charts is erected 11 months prior to the birth chart we<br />

could argue the point. Two months prior to conception<br />

the Soul enters the U-Epoch of Understanding. This marks<br />

the moment in time when the incoming soul portions off a<br />

piece of its psychic energy to form the etheric template for<br />

its lower consciousness in the mother’s womb. This could<br />

definitely be seen as the moment that life begins—but, who<br />

knows? Arguing about things gets us nowhere and becomes<br />

pointless when we are ignorant of the laws that govern life<br />

on Planet Earth.<br />

If the kids that I was eavesdropping upon had been<br />

better informed, instead of hassling each other over the<br />

question of “When is a human being officially considered<br />

to be alive?”, they could have been talking about the physics<br />

of reincarnation or having an interesting discussion<br />

about the complex series of choices that every Soul has to<br />

make before they make their formal entrance into the third<br />

dimension.<br />

It’s too bad none of us are allowed to access the books<br />

that are stored in the Vatican Library – and it’s too bad that<br />

our educational system is not designed to enlighten us<br />

or help us to penetrate the deeper mysteries. But, there is<br />

a ton of research that has gone into the study of prenatal<br />

astrology. If you delve deep enough what you find will blow<br />

your mind. If you are interested in finding out more about<br />

prenatal astrology, Charles Jayne’s “Preface to prenatal<br />

charts” is a good place to start. Let me leave you with that,<br />

pray that all of the above doesn’t rattle your pro life and pro<br />

choice cages too much, and invite you to take what you can<br />

from this week’s ‘scopes.<br />

Ways to stabilize the Social Security system, include:<br />

Increase payroll taxes: An increase in payroll taxes,<br />

depending on the size, could add years of life to the trust<br />

fund.<br />

Raise the retirement age: This has already been done<br />

in past reforms and would save money by paying benefits<br />

to future recipients at a later age.<br />

Tax Benefits of higher earners: By taxing Social Security<br />

income for retirees in higher tax brackets, the tax revenue<br />

could be used to lengthen the life of the trust fund.<br />

Modify inflation adjustments: Rather than raise benefits<br />

in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI), policymakers<br />

might elect to tie future benefit increases to the<br />

“chained CPI,” which assumes that individuals move to<br />

cheaper alternatives in the face of rising costs. Using the<br />

“chained CPI” may make cost of living adjustments less<br />

expensive.<br />

Reform is expected to be difficult since it may involve<br />

tough choices—something from which many policymakers<br />

often retreat. However, history has shown that<br />

political leaders tend to act when the consequences<br />

of inaction exceed those that would come from taking<br />

action.<br />

Kevin Theissen is the principal and financial advisor,<br />

of HWC Financial in Ludlow.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!