karbala-ml_ridhwan_kajee

poisonous tongues. Yazîd was not the first accused of being evil and
unjust. This accusation had already been leveled against Hadhrat Sa’d
ibn Abi Waqqâs. Yazîd was not the first branded as a drunkard. Walid
ibn Utbah was accused with the same. Yazîd was not the first accused
of adultery. This accusation had already been leveled against Hadhrat
Mughîra ibn Shu’ba
The people of Irâq, as Hadhrat Umar had rightly said, left no leader
exempt from their accusations and false propaganda. However, certain
individuals were selected to receive the worst that their tongues could
offer. Amongst them were Hadhrat Uthmaan, Hadhrat Mughîra ibn
Shu’bah, Hadhrat Amr ibn Al-Aas, Hadhrat Muâwiyah, Yazîd, and
in recent times, the last Caliph of the Islâmic world, Sultân Abdul
Hamid.
The accusation against Hadhrat Amr ibn Al-Aas,
and the issue of Tahkeem (Arbitration)
The incident of Tahkeem (Arbitration) is one that is well-known
amongst scholars. Unfortunately, the details of this incident have been
mixed with many filthy, poisonous lies, and propagated with such
strength, that for many it has become a fact-beyond-question. In the
version that the persian/jewish-satanists ensured gets propagated, one
finds a blatant attack being made upon the honour and noble character
of Hadhrat Amr ibn Al-Aas, an illustrious companion of Rasulullâh, a
Sahâbi who had the honour, after accepting Islâm, of being invited by
Rasulullâh' to all major consultations, and only after hearing his opinion
would Rasulullâh make a decision.
Unfortunately, due to the effort made behind the propaganda
regarding him, many good Muslims and even certain scholars have
34