CCChat-Magazine_Issue-27-Survivors-Speak
The FREE online magazine on and around coercive control
The FREE online magazine on and around coercive control
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
How instrumental was she to the
organisation?
Naomi: She was a specialist in human
interaction. She had been following a
lot of experts and she was a
psychologist, a behaviouralist and she
would go into different companies and
help restructure them. She was a
master of NLP, Keith heard of her and
wanted to meet her and when he
finally did I think all the stars aligned
for him to develop his course. I
remember hearing a story of Nancy
talking about how Keith was
developing ESP and I think Nancy was
Keith’s first student.
have taken the time to read any of the
court documents which were directly
written by him, but they are riddled
with typos and misspellings.
Morgan: He doesn’t write well, he
doesn’t speak well and he speaks in
word salad.
Min: That’s such a good way of
explaining it. I was listening to him
and trying to figure out why the words,
all joined up, are meaningless. It sort
of makes sense but then, if you’re
asked to explain it, you can’t explain it
back using your own words and so you
end up repeating it all verbatim.
" He doesn’t write well, he doesn’t speak well
and he speaks in word salad."
Morgan
Tabby: Nancy was extremely
instrumental in converting anything
that he had to say and turning it into
an intensive. She would be the one to
do all the research, pull in other
psychology into that research to make
it seem legitimate and she initially
created those modules. On top of that
she ran the company. She was there
every day, she had her office there and
she came into her office and was
extremely active. He was almost never
there and when he did come to the
centre it was a big deal. Nancy was the
one who was actively doing it all but
eventually different members were
given positions, so one person ran the
technology department, another ran
something else and they started calling
it divisions within the organisation but
Nancy was above all and initially the
only head trainer. I don’t know if you
This is so typical of how so many
groups work. You can’t explain what is
being said because it is illogical. For
me, it leads to an overwhelming sense
of confusion.
Naomi: It does because there is an
element where you are hanging on to
his every word, trying to get the
information and trying to learn what
does it take to be my most successful
self? How has this person been able to
run his company and how is he the top
three problem solver in the world? He
obviously had to learn that so let’s
listen to everything he’s got.
I remember he did this forum which
was broadcast live and we were in
California and he was in Albany and
the forum was interesting because he
talked a lot about love and people
could ask him questions and there was
Making The Invisible Visible