31.08.2021 Views

LMT Aug 30 - Vol 114 - issue 36

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lmtimes.ca • Last Mountain Times • Monday, <strong>Aug</strong>ust <strong>30</strong>, 2021 • /lastmountaintimes • @lmtimes<br />

A portion of expected<br />

yield<br />

21092BS1<br />

5<br />

There is not a lot to suggest the cloud of drought, which hangs over the Canadian<br />

Prairies, will have a silver lining for farmers,<br />

But some good news comes in part because crop yields will be low. Producers<br />

can anticipate some very high prices over the next few months as the full impact<br />

of the drought on production is better defined by actual crop in the bin numbers.<br />

There are already suggestions out there that lentil demand<br />

AG NOTES<br />

CALVIN DANIELS<br />

is going to be high, partly because there has been a drought<br />

in Turkey, and that country is a major lentil consumer. India<br />

is also expected to be an active buyer, having reduced import<br />

tariffs in order to assure supplies there.<br />

Of course, those high prices won’t be fully realized by<br />

producers here, with yields expected to be significantly below<br />

long-term averages. However, it might provide a bit of<br />

a financial buffer if the bushels produced are sold at higher<br />

than normal prices. It’s the same across most crops, which<br />

is the good news of a sort. But, not every bushel produced<br />

this fall will be able to garner the higher prices.<br />

As a financial tool, many producers’ forward price’ at least a<br />

portion of expected yield. The practice provides some know numbers for creating<br />

a financial plan. For some producers, the lower yields expected this year<br />

may not even fulfill the forward pricing contracts, which means no bushels to<br />

sell into a higher market now, and many producers will need to work with the<br />

contractor on just how they fulfill their part of the deal.<br />

The other <strong>issue</strong> may well be what grade the grain comes off this fall.<br />

With any luck, we won’t suddenly hit a wet spell which would be a disaster<br />

now that it is harvest time, but even with an open dry fall, grades may be hit<br />

hard. In the driest of areas, that is, large parts of the Prairies, the lack of moisture<br />

and extreme heat as heads filled will mean less than fully developed grain<br />

in the head. The usual plump kernels simply will not be there, and that can<br />

mean a lower grade, which in turn means lower prices.<br />

And while the situation is not good at present, and it is only <strong>Aug</strong>ust, there<br />

must be concerns when looking ahead to 2022.<br />

We haven’t gotten a lot of fall rain in recent years, and even winter snowfall<br />

has not been huge of late, and both things would be good in terms of replenishing<br />

soil moisture levels pore-seeding 2022. If those things do not occur, big fall<br />

rains and lots and lots of snow, producers are going to need spring rains to get<br />

a crop growing, but not so much they can’t plant, and then a far wetter summer<br />

than we have had in 2021.<br />

- Calvin Daniels<br />

Comment on this article at lmtimes.ca/calvin<br />

Disclaimer: opinions expressed are those of the writer.<br />

Consortium - continues from page 1<br />

the RM grades it as they do the RM<br />

roads; however, Strasbourg hadn’t put<br />

in gravel this year. Schmidt said they<br />

would contact the town of Strasbourg<br />

to let them know it needs to be done.<br />

Schmidt used Island View as an<br />

example because they had always<br />

supplied their own gravel. Herman<br />

agreed however implied the RM may<br />

have gravelled the road two years ago.<br />

Herman said Pelican Point also supplied<br />

gravel.<br />

Schmidt said it is a concern because<br />

the RV’ believe the RM is responsible<br />

for keeping the road in a safe and<br />

useful condition. He said that the RM<br />

grades and mows the grass.<br />

Councillor Gilbert said, “if there’s<br />

not much gravel on the road how are<br />

we supposed to keep it in a safe condition.”<br />

Schmidt said he went down the<br />

road the day before and noted there<br />

was not much gravel on the road. He<br />

said that Herman had tried to grade<br />

it, but “you can’t make anything out of<br />

it without gravel.” To which Herman<br />

agreed.<br />

Councillor for the Resort Village of<br />

Sunset Cove, Tom Fulcher, said the<br />

four resort villages in the RM formed<br />

a consortium. Fulcher speaks on behalf<br />

of the group.<br />

Despite Reeve Schmidt’s claim that<br />

the resort villages are expecting a<br />

maximum level of service from the<br />

RM, Fulcher said, “We have not placed<br />

any expectations on them at all other<br />

than to abide by the Municipalities Act<br />

which says to keep the roads in a safe<br />

condition.”<br />

“Our position is that there is a<br />

minimum standard of what a safe road<br />

would be. A safe road would include<br />

being able to get our residents, emergency<br />

service vehicles and school buses<br />

into our resort in a timely fashion<br />

and keeping our ditches mowed.”<br />

Fulcher said it’s common sense<br />

that if there is no gravel on the roads,<br />

they will turn into mud, making them<br />

unsafe. “If they are muddy roads can<br />

people safely travel on them? can<br />

emergency services travel on them?<br />

Can we get an ambulance in? can we<br />

get a police car in? can we get a fire<br />

truck in?”<br />

Fulcher said that even though the<br />

Resort Villages do not feel they are<br />

legally bound to enter into a road<br />

maintenance agreement with the<br />

RM of McKillop and don’t believe<br />

the Saskatchewan Municipal Board<br />

would mandate it; that in the spirit of<br />

co-operation and community cohesiveness,<br />

they are willing to enter into<br />

one, providing some funding to help<br />

maintain the roads. He said that “We<br />

don’t believe the SMB would mandate<br />

us to enter into one however we are<br />

still prepared to enter into one just to<br />

get along with the RM. We are part of<br />

the community. We like to think we<br />

are part of the community. We truly<br />

do appreciate that there are costs<br />

to maintain these roads but we also<br />

believe that it’s the RM’s legal responsibility<br />

to do so, but having said<br />

that we are willing to provide some<br />

funding towards maintaining these<br />

roads. However it appears the money<br />

that we’ve offered isn’t sufficient for<br />

the RM. The money we have offered is<br />

100% of the maximum rates that are<br />

prescribed under the Municipal Regulations.<br />

The Municipal Regulations<br />

prescribe what road hauling rates will<br />

be. So we, as resort villages, have offered<br />

the RM 100% of those rates…the<br />

RM has chosen not to accept that.”<br />

“We said to the RM… if you don’t feel<br />

that is sufficient, your argument isn’t<br />

with the resort villages, your argument<br />

is with the provincial government<br />

who sets these rates.” Fulcher<br />

said the RM should lobby the provincial<br />

government through SARM,<br />

saying these rates aren’t sufficient.<br />

“Instead,” he said, “they are continuing<br />

to go after us over what they feel<br />

is inadequate financial contributions<br />

towards these roadways.”<br />

Jennifer Argue, Local Journalism<br />

Initiative reporter<br />

Note: These reports are abridged for content

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!