05.10.2021 Views

Maintworld Magazine 3/2021

- maintenance & asset management

- maintenance & asset management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CASE STUDY<br />

Four levels of success.<br />

questions people will not complete the<br />

survey. If the information you request is<br />

difficult to access, once again, people will<br />

not complete the survey. However, with<br />

1.000 responses, we felt we had good<br />

information to work with.<br />

What is reliability success?<br />

The first challenge was to measure<br />

“success” - what is the definition of a<br />

successful reliability program? In an ideal<br />

world, we would receive detailed financial<br />

information about production output,<br />

maintenance costs, asset value, and<br />

other key information, and we would be<br />

able to normalize it against industry type<br />

– and we would be able to measure the<br />

contribution that reliability improvement<br />

made to those results.. However, as you<br />

may imagine, too few people have that<br />

information, and even fewer are willing<br />

(or able) to share it.<br />

Instead, we chose to go with three<br />

metrics: maintenance cost as a percentage<br />

of asset value, equipment availability,<br />

and the percentage of reactive maintenance.<br />

As it turned out, the information<br />

we received on the first metric was either<br />

unreliable or too few respondents were<br />

able to provide that information. Instead,<br />

we combined the other two metrics so<br />

that we had four levels of success, as<br />

illustrated above.<br />

Our next challenge was to analyze the<br />

data and attempt to determine what the<br />

people in Group 1 did differently to the<br />

other groups. We asked questions about<br />

training, the techniques they use to<br />

develop their reliability strategy, the age<br />

of the program, the software and instrumentation<br />

they used, and many other<br />

factors. But what appeared to come from<br />

the survey was that the programs with<br />

the best culture achieve the best results.<br />

The programs with the strongest management<br />

support had the best culture.<br />

And the programs that developed the<br />

financial business case had the strongest<br />

management support.<br />

Our conclusion, therefore, was that<br />

developing a business case was one of the<br />

root causes of program success.<br />

Do surveys and correlation<br />

prove anything?<br />

Stepping back for a second, it is fair to say<br />

that it can be challenging to distinguish<br />

between causation and correlation.<br />

As I like to point out, global warming is<br />

statistically correlated with the number<br />

of pirates in the world. As the number<br />

of pirates has steadily decreased, the<br />

temperature of the globe has steadily<br />

increased, as illustrated on the next page.<br />

There is a mathematical correlation.<br />

But I think most people would agree that<br />

the size of the population of pirates has<br />

had little to do with global warming.<br />

And thus, it is the same with the<br />

author’s interpretation of the survey results.<br />

Can I say, categorically, that it was<br />

the existence of the business case that<br />

resulted in achieving the support of senior<br />

management? I expected that to be<br />

the case, therefore I may be guilty of<br />

confirmation bias. But a close examination<br />

of the data showed that 95% of the organizations<br />

that have a business case also had<br />

strong senior management support.<br />

It is also true that there may be<br />

other reasons why an organization had<br />

a culture that supported the concept of<br />

reliability improvement. But we did find<br />

that 96% of the organizations that either<br />

had strong or moderate senior management<br />

support had the right culture.<br />

And finally, it is also difficult to prove,<br />

without a doubt, that the nature of the<br />

culture influenced the success achieved<br />

by the reliability improvement program.<br />

But approximately 90 percent of the<br />

organizations in Group 1 reported:<br />

• Everyone understands the benefits<br />

[86%]<br />

• Everyone is encouraged to provide<br />

suggestions for improvement [90%]<br />

• Everyone understands the mission<br />

[95%]<br />

• Everyone is actively engaged [90%]<br />

As mentioned earlier, we examined other<br />

factors, mostly technical, but none of them<br />

achieved the high percentages listed above.<br />

As the owner of an international training<br />

organization, I was disappointed to learn<br />

that the level of training and certification<br />

did not strongly correlate with program<br />

success. Fifty percent of Group 1 and 2 said<br />

they had strong training, skills, and certification<br />

while another 40 percent said they<br />

had “somewhat strong” training, skills, and<br />

certification.<br />

3/<strong>2021</strong> maintworld 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!