24.12.2012 Views

Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques Pulsés CNRS – INSA

Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques Pulsés CNRS – INSA

Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques Pulsés CNRS – INSA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

einforcement only reinforces in tangential direction, it does not reduces the axial stress in the wire). Such axial<br />

reinforcement would be most likely metallic and could as such introduce extra insulation problems, but it is<br />

worth to be tried.<br />

higher fields for users<br />

Higher fields for users make onlysense if a reasonable lifetime (>100 pulses at maximum field) can be obtained.<br />

This is not only for reasons of coil efficiency but also because coil failures can damage the cryostat, data<br />

acquisition equipment and the sample. A good way to increase the lifetime is to downgrade the actual user field<br />

to 90% of the maximum field. This reduces the stresses by 20%. Moreover it turned out that every modification<br />

of a coil <strong>des</strong>ign, although beneficial in the long term, normally reduces the lifetime of the first few coils that are<br />

produced in that way. This means that modifications have to be performed in a prudent and systematic way and<br />

preferentially tested on small coils.<br />

rapid cooling and “high duty cycle” coils”<br />

It is quite likely that a lot of gain (10-50 times) can be obtained in rapid cooling techniques, either by optimising<br />

the existing technique or by using coil-construction techniques used for DC coils but now with liquid nitrogen<br />

cooling. This latter approach sounds very interesting and could be very fruitful since the laboratory has merged<br />

with the laboratory for DC fields in Grenoble. A minor concern might be the impedance of these coils since they<br />

are normally <strong>des</strong>igned for voltages much lower than 24 kV. But we believe that this problem can be solved.<br />

Summary & Outlook: generator<br />

The generators are working fine and do not need a lot of modification or maintenance. In theory the idea of<br />

replacing the current limiting self-inductances by non-linear resistors (high-T c current limiters) seems interesting<br />

and efficient (more energy available, less rise-time limitations), but this technique is not very mature and still<br />

expensive, so it might be better to postpone its implementation for a few years.<br />

14 MJ generator<br />

The generator is now very stable and reliable. The aspects that could be improved, and should be if the number<br />

of users increases, is the duration of the charging and specially the duration of commutation between the boxes<br />

and the time it needs to change the polarity. This modification can be realised by installing pneumatic switches<br />

and at the same time reducing the number of thyristor stacks and replacing them by optical thyristors.<br />

Safety should always stay a major issue, and with the installation of more independent generators the interlock<br />

and grounding should be re<strong>des</strong>igned.<br />

6 MJ transportable generator<br />

Within two years this generator should become available, either (preferred) by acquiring a turnkey solution or by<br />

building the generator in house. This will greatly facilitate the test of medium size monolithic coils in the fieldrange<br />

from 70 to 90 T and the operation of a dual coil system.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!