24.12.2012 Views

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New ...

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New ...

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10-04285-brl Doc 127 Filed 08/17/12 Entered 08/17/12 14:29:55 Main Document<br />

Pg 56 of 133<br />

correspondence sent to Luxalpha, setting up the fund’s annual general meeting, and filing<br />

documents with the Luxembourg financial regulator. (See Section III.B.2., supra.; Pergament<br />

Decl. Exs. 38 at 2–4; 28 at 22–23.) The “Day-to-Day Managers” of Luxalpha, at least as of<br />

2006, were UBSFSL employees. (Pergament Decl. Exs. 47 at 2; 48 at 2; 49 at 2.) Luxalpha<br />

even used UBSFSL’s offices in Luxembourg as its address. (Pergament Decl. Exs. 50 at 2; 49 at<br />

2.)<br />

An agency relationship exists where entities are “engaged in a single business enterprise<br />

that relies on the joint efforts” of each of the entities, which are “coordinated and controlled” by<br />

the parent entity. Dorfman, 2002 WL 14363, at *11. Here, Luxalpha was little more than a fee-<br />

generating portal present in the United States, which could not have functioned but for UBS SA<br />

and UBSFSL, such that Luxalpha’s jurisdictional contacts should be imputed to UBS SA and<br />

UBSFSL.<br />

4. UBSTPM is Subject to Jurisdiction Through Its Role as Luxalpha’s<br />

Management Company, and Because UBS SA Acted as Its Agent<br />

The third UBS AG subsidiary in this action, UBSTPM, is also subject to jurisdiction<br />

because it maintained minimum contacts with the United States related to Luxalpha. UBSTPM<br />

outwardly served as Luxalpha’s management company from August 2006 to November 2008,<br />

taking over the portfolio management role from UBS SA. (Am. Compl. 19, 21; Hemmen Decl. <br />

9 [Bankr. S.D.N.Y. ECF No. 114.]) Luxalpha’s sales prospectus advised investors that<br />

UBSTPM was responsible for managing and administering the fund, as well as monitoring<br />

investment policies and restrictions. (Pergament Decl. Ex. 51 at 7, 17.) Pursuant to its contract<br />

with Luxalpha, UBSTPM was officially responsible for Luxalpha’s investment management<br />

decisions, among other roles. (Pergament Decl. Ex. 52 at LuxAlpha 00410.) Of course,<br />

UBSTPM did not disturb the investment decision to invest Luxalpha entirely with BLMIS,<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!