24.12.2012 Views

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New ...

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New ...

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10-04285-brl Doc 127 Filed 08/17/12 Entered 08/17/12 14:29:55 Main Document<br />

Pg 89 of 133<br />

Luxalpha and Groupement’s performance for the period, and BLMIS’s purported entrances and<br />

exits from the stock market. (See, e.g., Pergament Decl. Exs. 149-151.) If there was any doubt<br />

that the work of AIA Ltd. was performed in <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>, these reports themselves explicitly state<br />

that they were “[p]repared by [<strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>-based] Access International Advisors, Inc. for Access<br />

International Advisors Limited.” (Pergament Decl. Exs. 149 at 2; 150 at 2, 10-13; 151 at 2, 14–<br />

19.)<br />

If Access’s <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> office had not performed these analyses and generated reports on<br />

BLMIS’s activities for AIA Ltd., AIA Ltd. would have had to perform those activities itself. But<br />

with no employees, it is obvious that AIA Ltd. could not have done so. Nor could it meet its<br />

obligations to introduce prospective clients to Luxalpha, or meet its investment manager<br />

obligations to Groupement itself. These and other duties were performed by Littaye and<br />

Villehuchet, who each were present in <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> for purposes of jurisdiction, and other Access<br />

principals. As such, Access’s <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> office acted as the agent of AIA Ltd., and AIA Ltd. is<br />

therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the Court. See Van Egeraat, 2009 WL 1209020, at *2–4<br />

(finding personal jurisdiction based on the presence and activities of an affiliated entity where<br />

the <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> entity “renders services on behalf of the foreign corporation that . . . are<br />

sufficiently important to the foreign entity that the corporation itself would perform equivalent<br />

services if no agent were available” (internal quotations omitted)); see also Bulova, 508 F. Supp.<br />

at 1334 (courts “look to realities rather than to formal relationships” when determining<br />

jurisdiction based on parent-subsidiary relationships).<br />

Additionally, AIA Ltd. is also subject to jurisdiction because it is a mere department of<br />

Access’s <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> office. AIA Ltd. was owned completely (or nearly completely) by Littaye<br />

and Villehuchet, who were also the owners of the AIA LLC and AIA Inc. entities that comprised<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!