range xxi - U.S. Army Environmental Center

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND RESULTS FOLLOW-ON PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS POINT OF CONTACT PROGRAM PARTNERS future ESH requirements. The guide is intended to provide information that will help make the ESH evaluation a useful tool for PMs in carrying out their responsibilities to consider ESH requirements and issues early in the design process and will make sure potential program “showstoppers” are identified and resolved early in the acquisition process. • Received and incorporated comments on the draft PESHE Guide. • Developed the coordinating draft of the PESHE Guide and distributed it for comments. • Obtained PEO comments. • Developed an updated guide (July 1999) based upon PEO comments. • Because of recent changes to the DoD 5000 Series, and concurrent changes to the DoD Acquisition Deskbook, initiated updates to the PESHE Guide. • Current plans are to complete updating and improving the guide in spring 2001, following the anticipated completion and approval of the revised DoD 5000.2-R. • Distribute a memorandum from the Assistant Secretary of the Army (ASA) for Installation and Environment with Mr. Ray Fatz’s signature to ASA for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology with a fact sheet for the PESHE Guide for distribution to the acquisition community. The fact sheet will describe the guide and inform acquisition community members on how they can access the guide on the World Wide Web (DoD Acquisition Deskbook under Reference Library/ Army Documents/Discretionary Documents and on the USAEC Web page). Louis Kanaras U.S. Army Environmental Center U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command Teledyne Brown Engineering BRADLEY A3 UPGRADE PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY LIFECYCLE COST ESTIMATE The Department of Defense (DoD) requires weapon system program managers (PMs) to integrate environmental considerations into their acquisition strategies and include environmental costs in their program cost estimates. The U.S. Army Environmental Center (USAEC) has been asked to assist the Bradley A3 Upgrade program office and the U.S. Army Cost and Economic Analysis Center (CEAC) in the development of lifecycle environmental costs for the Bradley A3 Upgrade ground combat system. 21
22 PURPOSE BENEFITS TECHNOLOGY USERS DESCRIPTION ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND RESULTS To develop and verify the environmental lifecycle costs for the Bradley A3 Upgrade ground combat system. By identifying program environmental cost elements, weapon system PMs can make informed decisions on environmental issues by evaluating their impacts on long-term costs. Identification of environmental costs helps the Army develop more accurate and complete lifecycle cost estimates for weapon system acquisition programs. Program Executive Officer (PEO)-Ground Combat Support Systems, PM-Bradley A3 Upgrade and the U.S. Army CEAC. In a 1997 audit, the DoD Inspector General found that environmental costs were not fully included in the Comanche program’s cost estimates. In fact, the Inspector General found the Comanche helicopter cost estimate might be understated. As a result of the audit, PM-Comanche and CEAC requested USAEC assistance in identifying and estimating lifecycle environmental costs. After completing the environmental lifecycle cost estimate for the PM- Comanche, USAEC provided similar data collection and coordination efforts with PM-Apache (AH-64D) and with PM-Chinook (CH-47F/ Improved Cargo Helicopter) to develop environmental lifecycle cost estimates for these programs. USAEC is also developing an environmental lifecycle cost estimate handbook for rotary wing aircraft. USAEC’s next step was to gather environmental lifecycle cost estimates for ground combat systems with the Bradley A3 Upgrade program selected as the first system and Crusader selected as the second. There are two versions of the Bradley Fighting Vehicle Systems (BFVS): an M2 Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV) and an M3 Cavalry Fighting Vehicle (CFV). A total of 1109 Bradleys will be modified to the A3 configuration. On 17 March 2000, a meeting was conducted at the PM-Bradley to coordinate the preparation of the Bradley A3 modification environmental lifecycle cost estimate. This project required analysis of the entire acquisition plan for the Bradley A3 Upgrade ground combat program, identification of all activities with environmental impacts, and estimation of all associated environmental costs. Costs were correlated to a work-breakdown structure for the program and documented using CEAC-approved costdocumentation formats. Lessons learned from this and other projects on ground combat systems will be included in a ground combat system environmental cost handbook. The handbook will serve as a guide for PEOs and PMs to estimate their programs’ environmental lifecycle costs. USAEC has conducted data collection efforts at United Defense Limited Partnership (UDLP) Lemont Furnace, Pennsylvania, and UDLP-York Pennsylvania, at PM Bradley A3 (Warren, Michigan), at Fort Hood,
Page 1: U.S. ARMY ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER AEC
Page 4 and 5: iv 4 PROGRAM FOCUS: RANGE XXI RANGE
Page 6 and 7: vi 6 PROGRAM PARTNERS PUBLICATIONS
Page 8 and 9: PURPOSE BENEFITS TECHNOLOGY USERS D
Page 10 and 11: TECHNOLOGY USERS DESCRIPTION ACCOMP
Page 12 and 13: FOLLOW-ON PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS POIN
Page 14 and 15: PURPOSE BENEFITS TECHNOLOGY USERS A
Page 18 and 19: POINT OF CONTACT PROGRAM PARTNERS S
Page 20 and 21: PROGRAM PARTNERS PURPOSE BENEFITS T
Page 22 and 23: ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND RESULTS POINT O
Page 24 and 25: DESCRIPTION ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND RES
Page 28 and 29: POINT OF CONTACT PROGRAM PARTNERS P
Page 30 and 31: Environmental Technology Programs
Page 34 and 35: FOLLOW-ON PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS coul
Page 38 and 39: BENEFITS TECHNOLOGY USERS DESCRIPTI
Page 44 and 45: ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND RESULTS for con
Page 54 and 55: POINT OF CONTACT PROGRAM PARTNERS P
Page 56 and 57: LIMITATIONS FOLLOW-ON PROGRAM REQUI
Page 58 and 59: TECHNOLOGY USERS DESCRIPTION Result
Page 60 and 61: Meetings with potential private ind
Page 62 and 63: Identify Need User Implementation &
Page 64 and 65: ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND RESULTS PUBLICA
Page 66 and 67: BENEFITS TECHNOLOGY USERS DESCRIPTI
Page 68 and 69: LIMITATIONS FOLLOW-ON PROGRAM REQUI
Page 70 and 71: Program Focus: Range XXI
Page 72 and 73: 68 high levels of airborne lead. St
Page 74 and 75: FOLLOW-ON PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 70 P
Page 76 and 77:
72 POINT OF CONTACT PROGRAM PARTNER
Page 78 and 79:
ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND RESULTS FOLLOW-
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
78 PUBLICATIONS Design Guidance Man
Page 84 and 85:
ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND RESULTS 80 LIMI
Page 86 and 87:
82 DESCRIPTION ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND
Page 88 and 89:
84 DESCRIPTION ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
FOLLOW-ON PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 88 P
Page 94 and 95:
90 The three distinct but related p
Page 96 and 97:
92 POINT OF CONTACT PROGRAM PARTNER
Page 98 and 99:
94 BENEFITS TECHNOLOGY USERS DESCRI
Page 100 and 101:
PURPOSE BENEFITS TECHNOLOGY USERS D
Page 102 and 103:
TECHNOLOGY USERS DESCRIPTION commun
Page 104 and 105:
PURPOSE BENEFITS DESCRIPTION ACCOMP
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
AAP AAPPSO ABM ABRP ACP ACSIM ACSIM
Page 110 and 111:
LAP LCAAP MAAP MACOM MDAPs MCAAP MM
Page 112 and 113:
APPENDIX B PROGRAM PARTNERS P2&ETD
Page 114:
Tennessee Valley Authority The Boei
show all

range xxi - U.S. Army Environmental Center

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?