25.07.2022 Views

080122_TT_AllPages

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 • AUGUST 2022<br />

FROM THE EDITOR:<br />

Open for<br />

discussion<br />

BETWEEN<br />

THE LINES<br />

LINDA GARNER-BUNCH<br />

editor@thetruckermedia.com<br />

If there's one thing I've discovered since<br />

joining the team at The Trucker, it’s that the<br />

trucking industry is never boring. There’s always<br />

something to discuss and debate, and<br />

very rarely does everyone agree.<br />

I suppose that’s true of any industry. Heck,<br />

it’s true of life in general.<br />

Politics and legislation are generally<br />

the top topics in trucking (see what I did<br />

there?), but I’ve discovered that drivers are<br />

just as passionate about their favorite (and<br />

least favorite) tractor manufacturer, standard<br />

versus automatic transmissions, fuel<br />

prices, driver-assist software ... the list goes<br />

on and on.<br />

Last month, skyrocketing diesel prices<br />

were top of mind for most truck drivers and<br />

carriers. At the time of this writing, however,<br />

prices seem to have begun a downward<br />

trend. That’s good news.<br />

However, there are always other issues on<br />

the horizon.<br />

One issue that’s actually not so new is<br />

California’s AB5 rule. On June 30, the U.S. Supreme<br />

Court declined to review challenges<br />

to the state’s controversial legislation that<br />

changes the definition of “independent contractor,”<br />

to the detriment of many gig workers,<br />

including truckers. Check out Brad Klepper’s<br />

take on the issue on this page.<br />

Another “new” topic is the lack of safe,<br />

secure truck parking (see the story on Page<br />

1). On July 20, the U.S. House Transportation<br />

and Infrastructure Committee took a step —<br />

hopefully in the right direction — to expand<br />

the nation’s truck-parking infrastructure.<br />

The Trucker will be keeping a close eye<br />

on both of these issues and working to keep<br />

readers updated with the latest news.<br />

Finally, on a purely positive note, I had<br />

the privilege of attending this year’s Walcott<br />

Truckers Jamboree, held at the Iowa 80<br />

Truckstop in Walcott, Iowa, July 14-16.<br />

What an amazing event!<br />

Nearly 100 trucks were entered in the Super<br />

Truck Beauty Contest, and I did my best<br />

to check out every single one. If you were<br />

there and I didn’t get to meet you personally,<br />

it wasn’t for lack of effort!<br />

I love meeting and visiting with drivers.<br />

Each one has a story to tell, whether it’s about<br />

what drew them into the industry, how being<br />

a trucker has changed their life, or their adventures<br />

on the road. Please feel free to reach<br />

out to me with your personal story. You can<br />

email me at lindag@thetruckermedia.com.<br />

And, until next time, keep those rigs between<br />

mustard and mayonnaise! 8<br />

ASK THE<br />

A<strong>TT</strong>ORNEY<br />

BRAD KLEPPER<br />

I am wrong about a lot of things. By “a lot,”<br />

I mean an obnoxiously large number of things.<br />

So, I guess I should not have been surprised<br />

when the Supreme Court of the United States<br />

(SCOTUS) denied cert on the California Trucking<br />

Association case challenging AB5.<br />

I know I shouldn’t have been, but damn,<br />

was I surprised.<br />

I know I am supposed to be neutral in these<br />

things, but I truly thought the court would<br />

grant cert on this case. There was, in my opinion,<br />

sufficient confusion among the courts,<br />

and SCOTUS now leans toward the conservative<br />

side (by a count of 6-3).<br />

Honestly, I would have bet you $1,000 that<br />

SCOTUS would hear the case. And I would<br />

have been wrong.<br />

Now, as background — and in case you<br />

have forgotten — California adopted AB5 to<br />

deal with wrongly classified employees. The<br />

bill was originally directed toward the “gig”<br />

economy (think Uber and Lyft) but found a<br />

home in the trucking industry. In essence,<br />

when the bill was signed into law it basically<br />

made the independent contractor business<br />

model for trucking companies extinct in California.<br />

How can that be, you ask? Simple. In passing<br />

the bill, the legislature adopted the test<br />

handed down by the California Supreme court<br />

in the Dynamex case. As a result, companies<br />

will now be required to use the ABC test set<br />

forth in Dynamex to determine independent<br />

contractor status.<br />

PERSPECTIVE<br />

What does implementation of California’s<br />

AB5 mean for the trucking industry?<br />

Trucker<br />

TALK<br />

According to the ABC test, for a person to<br />

be classified as an independent contractor, the<br />

ABC test requires:<br />

A. That the worker is free from the control<br />

and direction of the hiring entity in connection<br />

with the performance of the work and in fact;<br />

B. That the workers perform work that is<br />

outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s<br />

business; and<br />

C. That the worker is customarily engaged<br />

in an independently established trade occupation<br />

or business of the same nature as the work<br />

performed.<br />

Now, you don’t have to be a genius to understand<br />

that part B of the ABC test is basically<br />

an impossible standard for a carrier to meet.<br />

Any independent contractor hauling freight<br />

for a carrier will now be classified as an employee.<br />

So … where does this leave us? Well, it<br />

means AB5 is the law of California and is retroactive<br />

to Jan. 1, 2020. It also means that the<br />

independent contractor business model is basically<br />

dead in California. While the adoption<br />

of AB5 will definitely put some money into the<br />

state’s coffers, I think it is bad law, as it hurts<br />

small business in California.<br />

The last data I saw showed there are about<br />

136,950 small businesses with small fleets in<br />

California. Many of these use the independent<br />

contractor business model. Sure, there are<br />

some small businesses that take unfair advantage<br />

of the independent contractor business<br />

model, but I believe there are more that don’t.<br />

I also believe there are a lot of independent<br />

contractors who do not want to give up the<br />

freedom to control the “who, what, when and<br />

where” of how they work, not just in the trucking<br />

industry but throughout all businesses in<br />

California. This law impacts freelance writers,<br />

photographers, medical professionals,<br />

accountants, etc. The impact, I believe will be<br />

far-reaching.<br />

To my point, I know of several carriers that<br />

stopped hiring independent contractors domiciled<br />

in California when AB5 was first passed.<br />

In addition, I know that some independent<br />

contractors who wish to maintain that status<br />

have moved their “residence” across state lines<br />

to avoid the issue.<br />

I also know that other states have been<br />

watching the outcome of this case and have<br />

either proposed legislation ready or are planning<br />

to push for a similar law in their state. To<br />

be honest, I think you can look to “blue” states<br />

where the Democrats control all branches of<br />

the state government. I believe this presently<br />

includes states such as Colorado, Connecticut,<br />

Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Nevada,<br />

New Mexico, Oregon and Virginia.<br />

So, what can trucking companies do to address<br />

AB5 in California?<br />

They can simply agree to treat the contractors<br />

as employees. However, this may not be<br />

the best solution, as many of the drivers have<br />

their own trucks and WANT to be independent<br />

contractors.<br />

In theory, a carrier could also change its<br />

structure to be a logistics company, using independent<br />

carriers to deliver goods. This would<br />

arguably get past the part B of the ABC test:<br />

The independent contractors would no longer<br />

be working for a trucking company, so the job<br />

they perform would be outside the course of<br />

the hiring entity’s business. The only way to<br />

know for sure whether this would work would<br />

be for the courts to hear the matter. And there<br />

is no guarantee that the courts would agree.<br />

At the end of the day, I think AB5 will have<br />

a huge impact on business in California — an<br />

impact that I don’t think was anticipated.<br />

Brad Klepper is president of Interstate<br />

Trucker Ltd. and is also president of Driver’s<br />

Legal Plan, which allows member drivers access<br />

to services at discounted rates. For more<br />

information, contact him at 800-333-DRIVE<br />

(3748) or interstatetrucker.com and<br />

driverslegalplan.com. 8<br />

Every month, The Trucker news staff conducts an informal driver poll on or Facebook page<br />

(www.facebook.com/TheTruckerNewspaper). The latest poll asked the question, “Do<br />

you prefer a tractor with a standard transmission or an automatic transmission? Why?” The<br />

overwhelming response was in favor of standard trannies, but there are also a number of drivers<br />

who love their automatic shifts. Some of the responses are listed below (edited for clarity and<br />

length). If you have a question you’d like to see in the poll, email editor@thetruckermedia.com.<br />

“Depends. For certain applications, I find<br />

manual is better than auto on icy/slippery<br />

winter roads, and in other situations, auto<br />

is sure a lot easier on the clutch knee. Really,<br />

though, there’s nothing finer than running<br />

through the gear pattern on a cool morning just<br />

starting out.”<br />

— Susan Zenker<br />

“I prefer a manual. I feel that I have much more<br />

control over the truck with a manual transmission.<br />

THETRUCKER.COM<br />

I also despise all this auto-braking technology.”<br />

— Scott Cumerlato<br />

“I like to keep the RPMs low (short shift). I like<br />

to have a clutch I can feather while backing into<br />

a dock. I like being able to throw it in neutral<br />

going down a hill. I like an 18-speed manual<br />

transmission. I’m sure newer automatics are<br />

better. I drove an ’06 with one before. Didn’t like<br />

how the RPMs go so high before shifting.”<br />

— Ryan Forrest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!