Selwyn_Times: October 19, 2022
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Selwyn</strong> <strong>Times</strong> Wednesday <strong>October</strong> <strong>19</strong> <strong>2022</strong><br />
4<br />
NEWS<br />
Latest Canterbury news at starnews.co.nz<br />
Neighbours disagree over proposed<br />
• By Susan Sandys<br />
NEIGHBOURING Prebbleton<br />
residents are divided on<br />
whether to chop their land up<br />
as the pressure goes on from the<br />
district council and developers to<br />
intensify the district.<br />
Prebbleton is about to increase<br />
by another 820 sections after<br />
a successful plan change, and<br />
would almost double in size if<br />
two other plan changes are approved.<br />
Several residents live on one<br />
of the latest chunks of rural land<br />
that could go into housing –<br />
some support development while<br />
others are avidly opposed.<br />
The Plan Change 79 rezoning<br />
application, for 527 sections<br />
on 37ha on Birchs Rd, recently<br />
received 36 submissions.<br />
It comes as the Lincoln Voice<br />
residents’ group continues to<br />
fight Plan Change 69 in the Environment<br />
Court. PC69 would<br />
see 1710 sections on <strong>19</strong>0ha of<br />
rural land.<br />
Neighbours John and Sue<br />
Sheaf and Tom and Helen Fraser<br />
believe PC79 will not be successful<br />
as the National Policy Statement<br />
for Highly Productive Land<br />
came into effect on Monday.<br />
The PC79 area comprises mostly<br />
class 1 and 2 soils, which have<br />
been given enhanced protection<br />
in the new legislation.<br />
Nevetheless, they fear it will<br />
be approved and they will be<br />
surrounded by fences and dense<br />
housing, up to three stories high,<br />
in spite of the PC79 area being<br />
half a kilometre outside the<br />
Prebbleton town boundary.<br />
Sheaf said while rezoning to<br />
residential would dramatically<br />
increase the value of their home,<br />
no money in the world would<br />
make them want to sell to a<br />
developer.<br />
“That’s a matter of principle<br />
that we are prepared to put our<br />
bank balance against,” he said.<br />
Not only did they not want to<br />
move, they did not want to see<br />
the valuable soils “going underneath<br />
houses and asphalt”.<br />
Sheaf said he and Sue had lived<br />
happily at their 0.6ha property<br />
for six years. They had rebuilt the<br />
interior of their home, cleared<br />
weeds, and planted the area with<br />
natives, an orchard and vegetable<br />
gardens, and had hens for free<br />
range eggs.<br />
The Frasers said they had<br />
PARADISE: No amount of money in the<br />
world would make John Sheaf want to<br />
leave his lifestyle section on the outskirts of<br />
Prebbleton. Sheaf opposes Plan Change 97.<br />
lived on their 4ha property since<br />
buying it in <strong>19</strong>70 as a bare block.<br />
They had built their home, planted<br />
it out, and to this day farmed<br />
prime lambs there. They enjoyed<br />
living in a rural environment<br />
and believed their grandchildren<br />
would one day take it over and<br />
bring up their children there.<br />
“We are the longest-term residents<br />
within the proposed subdivision.<br />
We find it incomprehensible<br />
that someone can apply to<br />
subdivide our land without our<br />
consent,” Tom Fraser said.<br />
“It’s morally wrong, we don’t<br />
want to shift, but it’s also morally<br />
wrong to take highly productive<br />
land and convert it to concrete.”<br />
The Sheafs and Frasers<br />
were among the majority of<br />
submitters who opposed PC79.<br />
Reasons given by submitters<br />
also included pressure on<br />
infrastructure, increase in<br />
traffic, and oversupply of<br />
homes following the other two<br />
Prebbleton plan changes.<br />
Styles may differ to images shown.<br />
409 Main South Rd, Hornby<br />
dress-smart.co.nz