Lot's Wife Edition 4 2016
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
W<br />
hat<br />
Brocrates: misogyny in philosophy<br />
is a philosophy bro (also known as a ‘philosobro’)?<br />
A philosophy bro is a man who thinks he knows a<br />
lot about philosophy, or perhaps even does know a lot about<br />
philosophy, and he definitely thinks he knows more than you<br />
(unless you’re Peter Singer, whom philosobros tend to admire).<br />
They are usually found in the undergraduate philosophy<br />
classroom, Monash Philosophy Society, and sometimes in<br />
Wholefoods. You might be able to spot them by keeping an eye<br />
(or ear) out for men speaking loudly, name-dropping philosophers,<br />
and using overly complicated vocabulary and philosophy<br />
jargon. In class, or group discussions, they might repeat<br />
everything you’ve just said as if it were an entirely new and<br />
original point, speak over you, not listen to you, or mansplain<br />
something to you that you definitely already know.<br />
Philosobros prize rationality and reason, and are seemingly<br />
still influenced by the stereotype that women are irrational<br />
and emotional, which may be why they love to talk down to<br />
us, or assume we don’t know what we’re talking about. It’s not<br />
uncommon for women to not have their points taken up by<br />
philosobros until they’ve been repeated by other men. They<br />
seriously just don’t listen. On the occasion that they do listen<br />
to you, they’ll probably try pretty hard to derail the conversation.<br />
“I see your point but your argument is not clear. Where<br />
are the premises? What is your conclusion?” and “Have you<br />
got anything more than anecdotal evidence to back that up?”<br />
are common expressions you may hear philosobros spouting.<br />
Anecdotal evidence is absolutely not acceptable, and if you do<br />
have empirical evidence to back up your premises, it had better<br />
be of statistical significance, otherwise it won’t be regarded<br />
worthy of their consideration.<br />
All of this points to philosophy’s problem with women. It’s<br />
not very well known, in fact I didn’t realise until I was in the<br />
third year of my philosophy major, that philosophy is male<br />
dominated. It’s like the STEM of Arts. The main authors in almost<br />
all subsets of philosophy are predominantly male, philosophy<br />
departments tend to average 30% female staff (it’s worse<br />
in the UK and North America), and top philosophy journals<br />
publish way more men than women. Monash has never had<br />
a female professor in philosophy, women hit the glass ceiling<br />
by Lauren Karas<br />
Illustration by Angus Marian<br />
when they reach the level of associate professor. While many<br />
Arts disciplines were similarly male dominated a few decades<br />
ago, most of them have remedied their problems and now have<br />
a decent gender balance. Philosophy lags behind, and philosophy<br />
bros are a contributing factor.<br />
When you’re frequently disrespected, not listened to, repeated,<br />
and spoken over, it’s pretty easy to become disenchanted<br />
with a discipline. Combine that with the combative style of<br />
argument philosophy often requires and underrepresentation<br />
of women at senior levels, and you have a pretty unwelcoming<br />
environment for women. So, philosobros, and other men studying<br />
philosophy who don’t consider themselves philosobros,<br />
here are some things to consider when you’re philosophising:<br />
How much are you speaking? Are you taking up the whole<br />
conversation?<br />
Are you listening carefully to what other people, especially<br />
women, are saying?<br />
Is it your turn to speak? Have you raised your hand? Did<br />
someone else in your class raise their hand before you?<br />
Don’t depend on your tutor to moderate class discussions,<br />
we’re all adults at university, and you should really know<br />
how to respectfully engage in a discussion by now.<br />
And, to the women interested in philosophy but deterred<br />
by those pesky philosobros, don’t let them stop you! There are<br />
loads of amazing women philosophers to look up to, and things<br />
are slowly changing in the discipline. You’re just as capable as<br />
that guy in your tute who can’t shut up about Kant or Žižek.<br />
While it’s understandable, it’s an awful shame to see brilliant<br />
women dropping out of philosophy.<br />
Finally, it’s very important to note that philosophy has a<br />
problem with diversity generally. It’s not just women who are<br />
excluded and underrepresented, but pretty much all marginalised<br />
groups. Philosophy has a long way to go before it becomes<br />
a truly diverse discipline, and defeating the philosobros is only<br />
one step of the process.<br />
Lot’s <strong>Wife</strong> | 21