29.04.2024 Views

TLA66_AllPages

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Government affairs<br />

How MUCH<br />

is TOO Much?<br />

Electrification of the<br />

trucking industry has a price<br />

tag of at least $1 trillion<br />

By John Worthen<br />

The cost of fully electrifying the trucking industry is staggering.<br />

There’s a lot more to consider than simply the cost of new<br />

vehicles — which is considerable in itself. The nation will need<br />

to build a network of charging stations that’s capable of powering<br />

thousands of heavy commercial vehicles each day.<br />

A recent study, commissioned by the Clean Freight Coalition (CFC)<br />

and conducted by Roland Berger, reveals that creating a sufficiently<br />

dense long-haul charging network would require an initial investment<br />

of at least $57 billion investment by fuel retailers.<br />

To electrify all medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, fleets and<br />

charge point operators will need to invest $620 billion into chargers,<br />

site infrastructure, and utility service costs, the study notes.<br />

These figures are swirling around the trucking industry, creating<br />

a firestorm of debate.<br />

That’s because the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)<br />

on Friday, March 29, released strict new emissions standards for<br />

heavy-duty trucks, buses, and other large vehicles. Officials say<br />

the new standards will help clean up some of the nation’s largest<br />

sources of planet-warming greenhouse gases.<br />

According to the EPA, the new rules, which take effect for model<br />

years 2027 through 2032, will avoid up to 1 billion tons of greenhouse<br />

gas emissions over the next three decades and provide $13<br />

billion in net benefits in the form of fewer hospital visits, lost workdays,<br />

and deaths. In particular, the EPA says, the new standards<br />

will benefit an estimated 72 million people in the U.S. who live near<br />

freight routes used by trucks and other heavy vehicles and bear a<br />

disproportionate burden of dangerous air pollution.<br />

The new rules for heavy trucks and buses came just a week after<br />

the EPA announced new automobile emissions standards for passenger<br />

vehicles, which relax initial tailpipe limits proposed last year<br />

but are close to the same strict standards set out by the EPA for<br />

model year 2032.<br />

The rule for trucks is complex, with a range of electric-vehicle or<br />

other non-traditional sales projected, depending on the type of vehicle<br />

and use. For instance, 30% of heavy-duty vocational trucks and<br />

40% of short-haul day cab tractors must be zero-emission by 2032.<br />

Not long after the release of EPA’s statement, trucking industry<br />

stakeholders — including fuel providers and retailers, as well<br />

as motor carriers and others — were firing out responses. Most<br />

lambasted the new standards as unreachable with current electricvehicle<br />

(EV) technology and pointed out a lack of EV charging stations<br />

and power grid capacity limits.<br />

Most groups say the EPA’s new emission standards for heavyduty<br />

trucks have unachievable targets and will carry real consequences<br />

for the U.S. supply chain and movement of freight.<br />

Like others in the trucking industry, Jim Ward, president of the<br />

Truckload Carriers Association (TCA), believes the new EPA rule<br />

will have a significantly negative impact on its members, as well as<br />

the industry as a whole.<br />

“It’s important to recognize the progress that’s been made by<br />

our many TCA members who have tested equipment, trained both<br />

technicians and professional drivers, while incurring additional<br />

costs along the way to complying with EPA regulations instituted<br />

over the past couple of decades,” Ward said.<br />

“The industry has effectively reduced NOx and particulate matters<br />

through the evolution and implementation of new technologies<br />

and remains committed to being a good steward of the environment,”<br />

he continued. “The journey ahead provides for many<br />

alternatives to be considered to lower carbon, such as blended<br />

biodiesel, renewable natural gas, diesel-electric — just to name a<br />

few — to help us bridge the gap to the future.<br />

“We cannot just sit idly by and watch the implementation of a<br />

policy that will have a significant impact on our members’ business,”<br />

he concluded.<br />

NATSO, an organization that represents America’s travel plazas and<br />

truck stops, and SIGMA: America’s Leading Fuel Marketers, said in a<br />

joint statement that while they appreciate that the Biden administration<br />

is working toward reducing carbon emissions, the new EPA rule is<br />

poised to have negative effects on trucking and its related industries.<br />

“The administration’s final rule does not adequately consider<br />

the challenges that fuel retailers face in transitioning to heavy-duty<br />

truck electrification,” the joint statement noted. “The administration’s<br />

final rule also does not recognize the need to support lower<br />

carbon alternatives to diesel fuel that are currently commercially<br />

viable, such as biodiesel and renewable diesel.”<br />

In addition, reports from the American Transportation Research<br />

Institute (ATRI) identify the many challenges facing commercialvehicle<br />

electrification in the areas of U.S. electricity supply and demand,<br />

electric vehicle production, and truck-charging requirements.<br />

“Off-highway refueling locations will need dozens of fast-<br />

Sponsored by SCALE FUNDING / GETSCALEFUNDING.com / 800.707.4845<br />

8 Truckload Authority | www.Truckload.org TCA MAY/JUNE 2024

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!