30.12.2012 Views

The Science and Statistics Behind Spanking Suggests that

The Science and Statistics Behind Spanking Suggests that

The Science and Statistics Behind Spanking Suggests that

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11-FULLER_FINAL_AFTERPROOF.DOC 2/17/2009 8:50 AM<br />

304 AKRON LAW REVIEW [42:243<br />

Time Warner CEO Richard Parsons said of his parents who<br />

spanked him, “It was just clear to me <strong>that</strong> both my parents were focused<br />

on my well-being, my happiness, my prospects for success, satisfaction,<br />

contentment.” 333<br />

Likewise, Kaye/Bassman International CFO Nick Turner credited<br />

corporal punishment for his success. 334 As an executive recruiter, Mr.<br />

Turner said about ninety percent of the top executives were spanked as<br />

he was, <strong>and</strong> they turned out to be “stable, focused, [<strong>and</strong>] competitive.” 335<br />

For balance, the USA Today journalist also interviewed Dr. Straus.<br />

While Dr. Straus admitted <strong>that</strong> “very good parents” spank, he said the<br />

CEOs would be doing “even better” had they not been spanked. 336<br />

While it’s unclear what makes someone a super-CEO, the sound<br />

research contradicts Dr. Straus’ claim. Children who are never spanked<br />

don’t seem to do “even better” than they would have with spanking;<br />

instead, they tend to do worse than many who are spanked. 337<br />

So, on the one h<strong>and</strong>, spanking opponents receive most of the media<br />

coverage, <strong>and</strong> <strong>that</strong> media coverage often is unopposed. On the other<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, positive reports about spanking are weak counterbalances because<br />

they usually include opposing viewpoints, even if those views are<br />

unfounded. This amounts to a virtual monologue about a subject <strong>that</strong><br />

deserves a dialogue.<br />

333. EVE TAHMINCIOGLU, FROM THE SANDBOX TO THE CORNER OFFICE: LESSONS LEARNED<br />

ON THE JOURNEY TO THE TOP 15 (2006).<br />

334. See Jones, supra note 331.<br />

335. Id.<br />

336. Id. (“Straus says it comes as no surprise <strong>that</strong> CEOs who were spanked express great<br />

affection for their parents. It’s not just bad parents who spank. ‘So do very good parents,’ he says.<br />

‘<strong>The</strong>y would be even better parents if they didn’t spank, <strong>and</strong> their kids would be doing even<br />

better.’”).<br />

337. See, e.g., LEFKOWITZ, supra note 292 <strong>and</strong> accompanying text. Compare Baumrind,<br />

Causally Relevant Research, supra note 21, at 10 (“<strong>The</strong> 3 children (all girls) of parents who totally<br />

abstained from spanking at all time points, were not more competent by adolescence than those<br />

whose parents spanked occasionally. All were prosocial, but two were very low on selfassertiveness<br />

<strong>and</strong> the one who was self-assertive <strong>and</strong> achievement-oriented manifested severe<br />

internalizing <strong>and</strong> externalizing symptoms.”), with Diana Baumrind, <strong>The</strong> Influence of Parenting Style<br />

on Adolescent Competence <strong>and</strong> Substance Use, 11 J. EARLY ADOLESCENCE 56, 69-71 (1991)<br />

[hereinafter Baumrind, Influence] (showing <strong>that</strong> children in authoritative families (who were<br />

spanked, sometimes often) displayed minimal internalizing <strong>and</strong> externalizing problems, <strong>and</strong> had<br />

generally healthy self-assertiveness), <strong>and</strong> supra note 217 <strong>and</strong> accompanying text.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!