final report - JRC IPTS - Sustainable Production and Consumption ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2 Final Report Compost production and use in the EU Authors: Josef Barth 1 , Florian Amlinger 2 , Enzo Favoino 3 , Stefanie Siebert 4 , Bertram Kehres 4 , Ralf Gottschall 5 , Marion Bieker 5 , Anita Löbig 5 , Werner Bidlingmaier 1 1 ORBIT e.V. / European Compost Network ECN, Postbox 2229, D-99403 Weimar, Germany 2 Kompost - Entwicklung & Beratung, Technisches Büro für Landwirtschaft. Hochbergstr. 3, A-2380 Perchtoldsdorf, Austria 3 Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza, Viale Cavriga 3, I-20052 Monza, Italy 4 Bundesgütegemeinschaft Kompost e.V, Von-der-Wettern Str. 25, D-51149 Köln-Gremberghoven, Germany 5 Humus & Erdenkontor GmbH, Karlsbrunnenstr. 4, 37249 Neu-Eichenberg, Germany COMPOST PRODUCTION AND USE IN THE EU
ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors would like to thank Mr Peter Eder of JRC in Seville for the very fruitful and important exchange and debate during the elaboration of this study. For providing in depth information by filling the questionaire and subsequent mail and phone contacts special appreciation is expressed to Elke Vandaele, BE; Liliya Evtimova, BG; Michalis Partis, CY; Lucie Valentová and Alzbeta Pokorna, CZ; Stefanie Siebert and Maria Thelen-Jünglich, DE; Henrik Wejidling, DK; Robert Kiviselg, EE; Francesc Giró i Fontanals, ES; Christof Gareis, FI; Fabienne David, Isabelle Feix, Fabienne David and Yves Coppin, FR; Katia Lasaridi, GR; Laszlo Alexa, HU; Percy Foster, IE; Massimo Centemero IT; Vidas Andrikis, LT; Liette Mathieu and Klaus Gröll, LU; Ruta Bendere, LV; Kevin Mercieca; MT; Evert-Jan Verbunt and Paul J.M. Sessink, NL; Grzegorz Siebielec, PL; Ana Silveira and Ana Pires, PT; Brînduşa Petroaica, RO; Marijana Cabrijan and Ivan Gobec, SI; Maroš Záhorský, SK; Jane Gilbert and Emily Nichols, UK. We also thank Professor Dr. Martin Kranert for final review of the report. COMPOST PRODUCTION AND USE IN THE EU 3
Page 1: EUROPAEN COMMISSION DG Joint Resear
Page 5 and 6: 2.1 Task 2.1 - Compost production a
Page 7 and 8: TABLE 27: CRITERIA AND NATIONAL REG
Page 9 and 10: FIGURE 22: COMPOST PRODUCED IN EU27
Page 11 and 12: Proximity principle Advocates that
Page 13 and 14: In some cases, where stabilised bio
Page 15 and 16: Even if modern separation technolog
Page 17 and 18: As a general rule today, for regula
Page 19 and 20: At least in countries with an advan
Page 21 and 22: COMPOST PRODUCTION AND USE IN THE E
Page 23 and 24: timely and sufficient response to t
Page 25 and 26: Task 3: Identify and quantify the u
Page 27 and 28: Mulch compost Compost of generally
Page 29 and 30: Table 3: Number of classes in compo
Page 31 and 32: DE Type of Classification Precautio
Page 33 and 34: Type of Classification IE Precautio
Page 35 and 36: Type of Classification Precaution h
Page 37 and 38: Type of Classification UK Input mat
Page 39 and 40: It is important to note that the sc
Page 41 and 42: Table 4: General overview on the sy
Page 43 and 44: Statutory Voluntary [S] / [V] Main
Page 45 and 46: Table 5: Comparative list of waste
Page 47 and 48: Type of waste material Further spec
Page 53 and 54:
Criterion/Parameter General justifi
Page 55 and 56:
“For example, some people place f
Page 57 and 58:
Therefore sample taking has been ad
Page 59 and 60:
Sampling Equipment and Sample Conta
Page 61 and 62:
Austria With shovel: extracted from
Page 63 and 64:
Table 12: Mean coefficients of vari
Page 65 and 66:
[II] Limits for repeatability 53 [t
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 4 shows an example for the t
Page 69 and 70:
Country Regulation Type of standard
Page 71 and 72:
1.3.6 Austria - an example for comp
Page 73 and 74:
Table 18: Very strict (level 1 - lo
Page 75 and 76:
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 2
Page 77 and 78:
120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 52% 45
Page 79 and 80:
It can be concluded: • Setting li
Page 81 and 82:
mg kg -1 soil [30 cm] mg kg -1 soil
Page 83 and 84:
1.3.10 Impurities Impurities or any
Page 85 and 86:
1.3.11 Process and health related r
Page 87 and 88:
I n d i r e c t TIME- TEMPERATURE R
Page 89 and 90:
Category 3 material used as raw mat
Page 91 and 92:
This includes a range of varying re
Page 93 and 94:
a) Statutory standards The key reas
Page 95 and 96:
(2) Quality assurance as an instrum
Page 97 and 98:
I. Raw material II. Requirements fo
Page 99 and 100:
Country (Quality label) Status of q
Page 101 and 102:
Country (Quality label) Status of q
Page 103 and 104:
B. Additional quality assurance req
Page 105 and 106:
In Table 26 we allocated compost re
Page 107 and 108:
Figure 17: Registration and certifi
Page 109 and 110:
4) Third party certification under
Page 111 and 112:
Therefore examples of national EoW
Page 113 and 114:
Statutory Voluntary [S] / [V] Compo
Page 115 and 116:
Statutory Compost = Legal basis or
Page 117 and 118:
Statutory Voluntary [S] / [V] Compo
Page 119 and 120:
just heavy metals, but nutrient con
Page 121 and 122:
SI SK UK Regulation Requirements or
Page 123 and 124:
sludge regulations, where the maxim
Page 125 and 126:
Though promoted by individual compa
Page 127 and 128:
x 1000 t 18.000 16.000 14.000 12.00
Page 129 and 130:
tons/year 3.500.000 3.000.000 2.500
Page 131 and 132:
2.3 Task 2.3 - Amounts of compost u
Page 133 and 134:
2.4 Task 2.5 Amounts of input mater
Page 135 and 136:
Greenhouses M EUR 20-40 Nurseries S
Page 137 and 138:
3 Task 3: Quantitative assessment o
Page 139 and 140:
Table 38: Potential of fertiliser s
Page 141 and 142:
2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Sewage sl
Page 143 and 144:
Table 40: Amounts of composted mate
Page 145 and 146:
An extrapolation of the German orga
Page 147 and 148:
4 Task 4 - Markets 4.1 Task 4.1 Pro
Page 149 and 150:
Table 44: Common organic waste trea
Page 151 and 152:
OPTIONS B/GWC AD MSWC MBT LAND INCI
Page 153 and 154:
operation of recycling and composti
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
4.2.1 The Netherlands The Netherlan
Page 161 and 162:
4.2.5 Ireland The following has bee
Page 163 and 164:
4.2.8 Germany A. Potential in Agric
Page 165 and 166:
Market sectors Products Source Mate
Page 167 and 168:
The restoration layer is the upper
Page 169 and 170:
Official data collection is not ava
Page 171 and 172:
4.2.11 European standards by trade
Page 173 and 174:
4.3 Task 4.3 - Prognosis and effect
Page 175 and 176:
5 Task 5 - Import/Export and potent
Page 177 and 178:
300 t/y annually 500 t ? DK up to 5
Page 179 and 180:
Industry surveys to date have not c
Page 181 and 182:
Environment Agency, 2007. Compost.
show all

final report - JRC IPTS - Sustainable Production and Consumption ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?