NA25 - www-user

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TVU 21 Minority reading: NA 27 Matthew 3:12 ou- to. ptu,on evn th/| ceiri. auvtou/ kai. diakaqariei/ th.n a[lwna auvtou/ kai. suna,xei to.n si/ton auvtou/ eivj th.n avpoqh,khn( to. de. a;curon katakau,sei puri. avsbe,stw|Å T&T #6 1 eivj th.n avpoqh,khn f13, pc 100 , Did 2 eivj th.n avpoqh,khn auvtou/ E, L, U, 279, 892, 983, 1424, pc 200 , Sy, mae-1 3 auvtou/ eivj th.n avpoqh,khn 01, C, D S , D, 0233, f1, 22, 2786, Maj 1100 , L1043, Lat, sa, bo 4 auvtou/ eivj th.n avpoqh,khn auvtou/ B, W, 372, 828, 1071, 1243, 2737, pc 40 , WH mg , Trg Lacuna: D, Q B: no umlaut (but on previous line 12 C, p. 1237 auvtou/ kai. suna,xei to.n) Parallel: NA 27 Luke 3:17 kai. sunagagei/n to.n si/ton eivj th.n avpoqh,khn auvtou/( 01 C , D, pc: eivj th.n avpoqh,khn Reading 1 omits auvtou/ because there are already two such pronouns in the verse (Metzger: "literary purism"). Reading 2 could be a harmonization to Lk. Reading 4 adds a fourth auvtou/ either to make it more symmetrical or accidentally while monotonous copying. On the other hand reading 4 might be the original and the other readings are attempts to correct the repetitive style. IQP's Crit. ed. has the Lukan eivj th.n avpoqh,khn auvtou/ for Q. Harnack (Sprüche Jesu, p. 88) has the Matthean form, txt above. Rating: 2? (NA probably original)
TVU 22 5. Difficult variant Minority reading: NA 27 Matthew 3:14 o` de. VIwa,nnhj diekw,luen auvto.n le,gwn\ evgw. crei,an e;cw u`po. sou/ baptisqh/nai( kai. su. e;rch| pro,j meÈ omit: 01*, B, L1043, L1602?, sa, Eus, NA 25 , WH, Bois, Weiss, Tis, Bal 01 corrected by 01 C1 Tregelles has VIwa,nnhj in brackets. 579 omits due to h.t. (13 to.n VIwa,nnhn … 14 o` de. VIwa,nnhj) Lacuna: D, Q B: no umlaut diakwlu,w "prevent" Compare previous verse: NA 27 Matthew 3:13 To,te paragi,netai o` VIhsou/j avpo. th/j Galilai,aj evpi. to.n VIorda,nhn pro.j to.n VIwa,nnhn tou/ baptisqh/nai u`pV auvtou/Å Similar to the omission of the auvtou/ at 3:7. There is every reason for the addition of VIwa,nnhj here to make clear that it is John who is speaking and not Jesus. Rating: - (indecisive)
Page 1 and 2: A Textual Commentary on the Greek G
Page 3 and 4: Lacunae of Q: 1:1-8 Lacunae of 1424
Page 5 and 6: Codex Schoyen: We note in the follo
Page 7 and 8: TVU 2 Minority reading: NA 27 Matth
Page 9 and 10: omitted by Mt. So, many scribes add
Page 13 and 14: Compare also the discussion by Bruc
Page 15 and 16: It might be interesting to identify
Page 17 and 18: Compare also: NA 27 Matthew 2:1 Tou
Page 23 and 24: NA 27 Matthew 18:30 o` de. ouvk h;q
Page 25 and 26: original and corrected into 'a son'
Page 27 and 28: TVU 12 Minority reading: NA 27 Matt
Page 29 and 30: TVU 13 NA 27 Matthew 2:18 fwnh. evn
Page 33 and 34: TVU 17 2. NA 27 Difficult variant:
Page 35 and 36: TVU 18 3. Difficult variant Minorit
Page 39: Note also the following addition: N
Page 43 and 44: The Latins reads "dixit ei" here. T
Page 45 and 46: inscribitur Pauli Praedicatio", ke,
Page 47 and 48: TVU 25 7. Difficult variant: Minori
Page 51 and 52: TVU 27 NA 27 Matthew 4:10 to,te le,
Page 53 and 54: TVU 28 8. Difficult variant: Minori
Page 59 and 60: TVU 31 10. Difficult variant: Minor
Page 61 and 62: Streeter "Four Gospels" (p. 250 foo
Page 65 and 66: TVU 35 Minority "Caesarean" reading
Page 67 and 68: sugcwroume,nhj mhde. qumou/ tinoj e
Page 69 and 70: TVU 37 Minority "Caesarean" reading
Page 73 and 74: So, the evidence here is not conclu
Page 75 and 76: Rating: 2? (NA probably original)
Page 77 and 78: Origen (2 nd CE, Fr. Matt. 104, s.
Page 79 and 80: Parallel: NA 27 Luke 6:29 tw/| tu,p
Page 81 and 82: Rating: - (indecisive)
Page 83 and 84: TVU 46 NA 27 Matthew 5:47 kai. eva.
Page 85 and 86: TVU 47 NA 27 Matthew 6:1 Prose,cete
Page 87 and 88: TVU 48 NA 27 Matthew 6:4 o[pwj h=|
Page 89 and 90: TVU 49 NA 27 Matthew 6:5 Kai. o[tan
Page 91 and 92:
TVU 51 NA 27 Matthew 6:6 o` ble,pwn
Page 93 and 94:
Rating: - (indecisive) External Rat
Page 95 and 96:
TVU 54 Minority reading: NA 27 Matt
Page 97 and 98:
Chrys Caragounis is of the opinion
Page 99 and 100:
TVU 55 NA 27 Matthew 6:13 kai. mh.
Page 101 and 102:
4. Didache, from Funk/Bihlmeyer (19
Page 103 and 104:
Possibly there is a Chiastic struct
Page 105 and 106:
Jewish connotations was unsuitable
Page 107 and 108:
See also: NA 27 Matthew 11:19 h=lqe
Page 109 and 110:
The original reading of 01 agrees w
Page 111 and 112:
TVU 60 16. Difficult variant: Minor
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Weiss notes (Textkritik, p. 125f.)
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Compare: NA 27 Mark 4:8 kai. a;lla
Page 123 and 124:
TVU 69 Minority "Caesarean" reading
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
TVU 78 A question of punctuation NA
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Note the omission of evn tw/| VIsra
Page 139 and 140:
The Latin ibunt seems to be a varia
Page 141 and 142:
TVU 84 Minority reading: Matthew 8:
Page 143 and 144:
NA 27 Matthew 14:19 kai. keleu,saj
Page 145 and 146:
TVU 86 Minority reading: Matthew 8:
Page 147 and 148:
NA 27 Matthew 14:22 Kai. euvqe,wj h
Page 149 and 150:
At the following verses the Byzanti
Page 151 and 152:
in Christianity. In earliest times,
Page 153 and 154:
As one can see, the tendency is alw
Page 155 and 156:
It is interesting that the exclamat
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Diatessaron: Gadarhnw/n Syriac Gera
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Rating: 2? (NA probably original) E
Page 165 and 166:
tou.j coi,rouj / h` avge,lh are the
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
TVU 100 NA 27 Matthew 9:8 ivdo,ntej
Page 173 and 174:
TVU 101 NA 27 Matthew 9:13 ouv ga.r
Page 175 and 176:
one. Weiss (Textkritik, p. 154) als
Page 177 and 178:
TVU 104 32. Difficult variant: Mino
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
TVU 108 NA 27 Matthew 9:27 Kai. par
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
TVU 110 Minority reading: NA 27 Mat
Page 189 and 190:
TVU 111 NA 27 Matthew 9:35 kai. qer
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
TVU 113 36. Difficult variant NA 27
Page 195 and 196:
Epiphanius is giving the names of t
Page 197 and 198:
Rating: 2 (NA clearly original)
Page 199 and 200:
There is no reason for an omission,
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
TVU 119 38. Difficult variant Minor
Page 205 and 206:
It is interesting that one has two
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
cleansed and the deaf hear. Finally
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
In Lk the words are safe. The txt r
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
TVU 140 45. NA 27 Difficult variant
Page 233 and 234:
self-sufficient neutrality, which i
Page 235 and 236:
Same in the parallel Lk 10:15 Byz A
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Here WH and Byz agree against txt.
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Weiss (Mt Com.) thinks that o;cloi
Page 251 and 252:
D seems to support the eivj too, be
Page 253 and 254:
the passive of prosfe,rw are also t
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
TVU 157 NA 27 Matthew 12:31 Dia. to
Page 259 and 260:
The verse was omitted probably due
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
TVU 161 Minority "Caesarean" readin
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Jerome (Comm. Mat.): Legi in nonnul
Page 281 and 282:
On the other hand the support is qu
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Compare also: NA 27 Matthew 9:32 Au
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
TVU 181 NA 27 Matthew 13:55 ouvc ou
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
probable than to that of Mk; while
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
The reading of 01* is strange. Metz
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
TVU 198 NA 27 Matthew 15:4 o` ga.r
Page 315 and 316:
TVU 200 NA 27 Matthew 15:6 kai. hvk
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Rating: - (indecisive)
Page 329 and 330:
TVU 211 69. Difficult variant: NA 2
Page 331 and 332:
sought there the home of Mary Magda
Page 333 and 334:
Compare: NA 27 Luke 12:54-56 :Elege
Page 335 and 336:
TVU 213 NA 27 Matthew 16:4 genea. p
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
TVU 216 NA 27 Matthew 16:13 ti,na l
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
TVU 218 NA 27 Matthew 16:20 to,te d
Page 345 and 346:
Compare also verse 16: NA 27 Matthe
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
TVU 223 NA 27 Matthew 17:11 o` de.
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Possibly avpisti,an is inspired by
Page 357 and 358:
And note: NA 27 1 Corinthians 7:5 i
Page 359 and 360:
It is interesting to consider the E
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
A strange addition. Metzger comment
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
TVU 233 NA 27 Matthew 18:7 Ouvai. t
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
TVU 236 NA 27 Matthew 18:11 BYZ Mat
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Parallels: NA 27 Matthew 5:32 evgw.
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Compare also: NA 27 Matthew 20:23 t
Page 397 and 398:
This must be discussed together wit
Page 399 and 400:
Or has the Byzantine reading been c
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
fhmi, is much rarer than le,gw. At
Page 405 and 406:
NA 27 Matthew 24:34 avmh.n le,gw u`
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
TVU 265 92. Difficult variant: NA 2
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
TVU 269 NA 27 Matthew 20:6 peri. de
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Hoskier (Codex B, I, p. 47) thinks
Page 431 and 432:
P37: After ibñ the papyrus breaks
Page 433 and 434:
Rating: 1? or - (NA probably wrong
Page 435 and 436:
Weiss (Textkritik, p. 46) thinks th
Page 437 and 438:
TVU 280 NA 27 Matthew 20:22-23 avpo
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
The first part u`mei/j ... ei=nai w
Page 447 and 448:
Nestle asks: "From where is the Aor
Page 449 and 450:
Taking both verses together, we get
Page 451 and 452:
eally make a decision about the pos
Page 453 and 454:
TVU 287 NA 27 Matthew 20:34 splagcn
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
TVU 293 104. Difficult variant: NA
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
TVU 298 106. Difficult variant: Min
Page 469 and 470:
Thus the four versions are: txt ver
Page 471 and 472:
The following comments by WH, based
Page 473 and 474:
W.C. Allen (ICC comm. Mt, 1912) wri
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
There is an extra file with images
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
TVU 302 107. Difficult variant Mino
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
Page 489 and 490:
TVU 309 NA 27 Matthew 22:30 evn ga.
Page 491 and 492:
Page 493 and 494:
The problem that gave rise to the v
Page 495 and 496:
NA 27 Luke 20:9 :Hrxato de. pro.j t
Page 497 and 498:
The problem here is that the transl
Page 499 and 500:
NA 27 Mark 12:33 kai. to. avgapa/n
Page 501 and 502:
Page 503 and 504:
Page 505 and 506:
Page 507 and 508:
Page 509 and 510:
Page 511 and 512:
Page 513 and 514:
TVU 323 NA 27 Matthew 23:14 - BYZ M
Page 515 and 516:
TVU 324 NA 27 Matthew 23:19 tufloi,
Page 517 and 518:
Page 519 and 520:
Parallel: NA 27 Luke 11:39 ei=pen d
Page 521 and 522:
Note, that the name in the LXX 2Chr
Page 523 and 524:
Page 525 and 526:
A. Pallis (Notes, 1932) writes: "th
Page 527 and 528:
Either tau/ta is a harmonization to
Page 529 and 530:
On the other hand it could be accid
Page 531 and 532:
Page 533 and 534:
LXX Isaiah 27:13 kai. e;stai evn th
Page 535 and 536:
TVU 336 NA 27 Matthew 24:36 Peri. d
Page 537 and 538:
Bas ep 236 : p. 361. h men oun tou
Page 539 and 540:
Some form of the phrase evn th/| h`
Page 541 and 542:
Tischendorf thinks that the additio
Page 543 and 544:
Page 545 and 546:
Page 547 and 548:
Page 549 and 550:
Page 551 and 552:
TVU 345 NA 27 Matthew 25:13 grhgore
Page 553 and 554:
TVU 347 NA 27 Matthew 25:16 poreuqe
Page 555 and 556:
Page 557 and 558:
Page 559 and 560:
Page 561 and 562:
TVU 355 NA 27 Matthew 26:3 To,te su
Page 563 and 564:
TVU 357 127. Difficult variant Mino
Page 565 and 566:
A. Pallis (Notes, 1932) writes: "[k
Page 567 and 568:
A curious mixture. The occurrences
Page 569 and 570:
TVU 361 TVU 362 NA 27 Matthew 26:42
Page 571 and 572:
Page 573 and 574:
It has been suggested to take the s
Page 575 and 576:
TVU 365 NA 27 Matthew 26:59 oi` de.
Page 577 and 578:
Parallel: NA 27 Mark 14:56-57 pollo
Page 579 and 580:
Page 581 and 582:
Page 583 and 584:
Page 585 and 586:
In Mt the first occurrence in chapt
Page 587 and 588:
Compare LXX: ai-ma di,kaion appears
Page 589 and 590:
Origen (Sermon 117 on Mat, Latin on
Page 591 and 592:
There actually exists a Jeremiah ap
Page 593 and 594:
If one is analyzing the text one fi
Page 595 and 596:
• Montague Rhodes James "The Lost
Page 597 and 598:
Origen (Sermon 121, on Matthew): "I
Page 599 and 600:
Rating: 1? or - (NA probably wrong
Page 601 and 602:
Page 603 and 604:
It is possible that the words were
Page 605 and 606:
Page 607 and 608:
There is the possibility that the s
Page 609 and 610:
Celsus (From Origen "Contra Celsus"
Page 611 and 612:
Page 613 and 614:
Page 615 and 616:
P. Williams comments on the Syriac:
Page 617 and 618:
Page 619 and 620:
Page 621 and 622:
Compare: Jo 19:34 NA 27 John 19:34
Page 623 and 624:
from John (only) here. But Severus
Page 625 and 626:
If this sentence is a secondary add
Page 627 and 628:
Page 629 and 630:
TVU 395 NA 27 Matthew 27:64 ke,leus
Page 631 and 632:
Page 633 and 634:
Mark 16:1-1 Mari,a 01, A, B, C, D,
Page 635 and 636:
TVU 399 NA 27 Matthew 28:6 ouvk e;s
Page 637 and 638:
Page 639 and 640:
Page 641 and 642:
Page 643 and 644:
NA 27 Matthew 7:24 Pa/j ou=n o[stij
Page 645 and 646:
Page 647:
An allusion in Justin (Dialogue wit
show all

NA25 - www-user

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?