09.01.2013 Views

PhD Thesis Emmanuel Obeng Bekoe - Cranfield University

PhD Thesis Emmanuel Obeng Bekoe - Cranfield University

PhD Thesis Emmanuel Obeng Bekoe - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

143<br />

Table. 5.8 Daily performance statistics for Manhia (sub basin 3) in the semi<br />

distributed mode<br />

Daily Calibration Daily Validation<br />

Period (1/03/68-28/02/1970) Period (1/03/1970-31/12/1972)<br />

All<br />

All Water Water Dry Dry<br />

Months Dry months Months year year Months Months<br />

01/11-<br />

1971- 1972- 1970- 1971-<br />

Period 28/02 Period 31/12/72 31/12/72 1972 31/12/72<br />

RMS (mm) 1.24 0.42 0.57 0.41 0.32 0.70 0.30<br />

PBIAS (%) 15.26 23.99 -65.35 -14.91 -31.16 -279.76 -156.17<br />

NSE 0.73 0.11 -1.17 0.10 0.33 -19.89 -10.60<br />

PME -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve<br />

Table. 5.9 Weekly performance statistics for Manhia (sub basin 3) in the<br />

semi distributed mode<br />

Daily Calibration Daily Validation<br />

Period (1/03/68-28/02/1970) Period (1/03/1970-31/12/1972)<br />

All<br />

All Water Water Dry Dry<br />

Months Dry months Months year year Months Months<br />

01/11-<br />

1971- 1972- 1970- 1971-<br />

Period 28/02 Period 31/12/72 31/12/72 1972 31/12/72<br />

RMS (mm) 5.68 1.84 2.33 1.43 1.01 2.92 1.10<br />

PBIAS (%) 15.19 23.31 -63.16 -31.58 -28.79 -290.52 -181.15<br />

NSE 0.77 0.25 -0.96 0.39 0.67 -13.73 -2.67<br />

PME -ve -ve -ve -ve 0.14 -ve -ve<br />

For the monthly calibration the NSE was 0.80 but for the validation period, it<br />

was -1.49 failing the Henrikson et al. (2003) criteria of NSE ≥ 0.5. The PBIAS<br />

was 15.26% meaning it was underestimating as compared to the lumped mode<br />

at Manhia which was overestimating (4.27%) for the same monthly simulation.<br />

5.7 Conclusion<br />

The modelling of the Densu Basin using the ACRU model has been undertaken<br />

and the results shown by means of sensitivity analysis, calibration and<br />

validation. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that cumulative total<br />

streamflow and baseflow respond to changes in ACRU parameters within the<br />

Densu Basin. The most sensitive parameter values identified in this basin are<br />

the monthly crop coefficients (CAY), Vegetation interception loss (VEGINT),<br />

Fraction of the effective root system in top soils (ROOTA) and the Drained<br />

<strong>Emmanuel</strong> <strong>Obeng</strong> <strong>Bekoe</strong> Phd <strong>Thesis</strong> Chapter 5 Hydrological modelling of Densu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!