09.01.2013 Views

PhD Thesis Emmanuel Obeng Bekoe - Cranfield University

PhD Thesis Emmanuel Obeng Bekoe - Cranfield University

PhD Thesis Emmanuel Obeng Bekoe - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Monthly Means of Actual<br />

Evapotranspiration (mm)<br />

168<br />

wet and dry whilst the R 2 are 0.24 and 0.46 for the wet and dry respectively,<br />

making this set of data also statistically different. At the monthly level, the<br />

ACRU model simulated higher AET values than Ayibotele (1974) in almost all<br />

the months except August, September and January (Figure 6.5b) whereas it is<br />

variable at Nsawam (Figure 6.5a). At this stage it is inconclusive to assign<br />

reasons for the difference in the two data sets apart from the mode of<br />

computation where Ayibotele (1974) AET was computed using the Penman<br />

(1948) equation and Monteith (1965) with mean monthly meteorological values<br />

as against mean monthly values for ACRU simulated. For how ACRU<br />

computes actual evapotranspiration from pan evaporation refer to Section<br />

3.4.2.3. Whether the ACRU simulated AET is better than the Ayibotele (1974)<br />

data is subjective, however, if going by the results of the PBIAS estimations<br />

observed through simulations then the dry seasons could have lower AETs as<br />

they give the most overestimation (-48%--330%; ref to Table 6.1) Overestimation<br />

in the dry season implies that there is too much simulated baseflow,<br />

which implies too much recharge in the wet season and/or incorrect baseflow<br />

recession constants. In that case the ACRU simulated AET’s could be closer to<br />

the actual than the Ayibotele (1974) values which are lower than the ACRU<br />

simulated (Figures 6.6a & 6.6b).<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Mar<br />

Apr<br />

May<br />

Jun<br />

Jul<br />

Aug<br />

Sept<br />

Oct<br />

Nov<br />

Period<br />

Ayibotele (1974) ACRU<br />

Figure 6.5a. Comparison between ACRU<br />

mean monthly AET and Ayibotele (1974) for<br />

Nsawam<br />

Dec<br />

Jan<br />

Feb<br />

<strong>Emmanuel</strong> <strong>Obeng</strong> <strong>Bekoe</strong> <strong>PhD</strong> <strong>Thesis</strong> Chapter 6 Discussion of Results<br />

Monthly Means of Actual<br />

Evapotranspiration (mm)..<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Mar<br />

Apr<br />

May<br />

Jun<br />

Jul<br />

Aug<br />

Sept<br />

Oct<br />

Nov<br />

Dec<br />

Period<br />

Ayibotele (1974) ACRU<br />

Figure 6.5b. Comparison between ACRU<br />

and Ayibotele (1974) for Manhia<br />

Jan<br />

Feb

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!