09.01.2013 Views

PhD Thesis Emmanuel Obeng Bekoe - Cranfield University

PhD Thesis Emmanuel Obeng Bekoe - Cranfield University

PhD Thesis Emmanuel Obeng Bekoe - Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

171<br />

intermediate groundwater store and coefficient of baseflow release from the<br />

intermediate store into the stream (Schulze, 1995).<br />

The earlier analysis of the delayed initial wetting up of the catchment following<br />

the 1967 dry season (in comparison to the observed) which the calibration could<br />

not correct and the generally poor simulation during the dry seasons suggests<br />

weaknesses in the recharge and baseflow generation model components.<br />

Everson (2001) and New (2002) also found some limitations of ACRU in relation<br />

to groundwater simulation.<br />

According to Everson (2001) a limitation observed during a relatively wet year<br />

simulation was the inability of ACRU to account for lateral subsurface soil water<br />

flow during a water balance study in South Africa, where analysis of the<br />

simulated unsaturated flow from the B horizon to the groundwater zone and<br />

saturated drainage could not account for the predominance of subsurface flow<br />

found in the catchment. The soils were reported as having organic matter<br />

contents of 6-10%, and high water holding capacities but the subsoils had a<br />

very high clay content and poor infiltration leading to soil water logging and<br />

lateral interflow within the more permeable upper soil layer. These mechanisms<br />

could occur in Densu Basin because of the heterogeneity of soils within this<br />

large catchment with water holding capacities and high clay contents, between<br />

35-55%, in the subsoils (Adu and Asiama, 1992).<br />

New (2002) observed two shortcomings of the ACRU model which affect<br />

baseflow simulation which are 1) the inability of the model to simulate the<br />

wetting-up of the catchments at the beginning of the wet season, which resulted<br />

in over prediction of streamflow and 2) the tendency of the ACRU model to<br />

underestimate dry season baseflow. In this modelling with ACRU for the Densu<br />

Basin, the dry season produced the most overestimation which may be as a<br />

result of reasons deduced in the earlier Sections such as “poor” input data, and<br />

weaknesses in the groundwater routine in ACRU where the delay in the initial<br />

wetting up of the catchment in 1968 (in comparison to the observed) could not<br />

<strong>Emmanuel</strong> <strong>Obeng</strong> <strong>Bekoe</strong> Phd <strong>Thesis</strong> Chapter 6 Discussion

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!