10.01.2013 Views

View - KOPS - Universität Konstanz

View - KOPS - Universität Konstanz

View - KOPS - Universität Konstanz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

parameters of sonority within consonant clusters and of nucleus complexity did not<br />

provide reasonable means of typologizing languages.<br />

Length contrasts, which have been discussed as a defining property of<br />

mora-based rhythm, show a rather erratic distribution across the languages of our<br />

sample. Phonemic length in vowel inventories has been documented for ten languages,<br />

co-occurring with almost any combination of the other phonological parameters of<br />

linguistic rhythm discussed so far. Such contrasts in vowels and, at the same time, in<br />

consonants are reported for otherwise prototypically stress-based languages like<br />

Maltese, but also for West Greenlandic, Tamil and Finnish. It seems therefore possible<br />

that length contrasts in vowels and consonants can appear in languages with any value<br />

for the parameters of phonetic correlates of stress, segmental effect of stress and syllable<br />

complexity. However, some languages behave as prototypical representatives of<br />

mora-based rhythm. The clearest case is West Greenlandic, a language which has no<br />

stress and no segmental effects of stress, a low degree of syllable complexity and length<br />

contrasts in vowels and consonants. The same could be said about Tamil, since it<br />

exhibits weak stress, no segmental effects of stress, a moderate degree of syllable<br />

complexity and phonemic length in vowels and consonants.<br />

With respect to the morphophonological parameters of the rhythm-based<br />

typology of language introduced in 3.2., we already noted the erratic distribution of the<br />

various relevant processes over the languages in our sample. The only generalization<br />

which can be drawn on this level of analysis is that assimilations across consonant and<br />

vowel clusters are only possible in languages whose phonotactics allow such clusters.<br />

Accordingly, Maori and Yoruba, which both lack consonant clusters due to their simple<br />

CV phonotactics, do not exhibit assimilations. Languages such as Kayardild, Georgian<br />

and Tamil will not show assimilation processes across vowels, since their respective<br />

phonotactics do not permit vowel clusters. However, even in the presence of clusters,<br />

there is no need to assimilate across the individual segments of a cluster. Mandarin<br />

Chinese phonotactics allow consonant clusters; nevertheless there are no rules of<br />

consonant assimilation across such clusters. Similarly, Catalan, which exhibits vowel<br />

clusters, has no rules of vowel assimilation across such clusters. A similar case could be<br />

made with respect to cluster resolution. When the phonotactics of a language prohibit<br />

such clusters from resulting in morphophonological processes, there will be no cluster<br />

171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!