10.01.2013 Views

Chapter 4 Sexual Content in Soap Operas - Leicester Research ...

Chapter 4 Sexual Content in Soap Operas - Leicester Research ...

Chapter 4 Sexual Content in Soap Operas - Leicester Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sex and <strong>Sexual</strong>ity: A <strong>Content</strong> Analysis of <strong>Soap</strong> <strong>Operas</strong><br />

well as the amount of such messages that programmes conta<strong>in</strong>. Both talk about sex<br />

and the depiction of sexually related behaviours are now found <strong>in</strong> a majority of<br />

programmes dur<strong>in</strong>g the ―Family Hour‖ time frame. The amount of sexual<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions overall <strong>in</strong> 1996 was up 118% s<strong>in</strong>ce 1986 and 270% s<strong>in</strong>ce 1976.‘ (p. 33).<br />

One of the obvious areas that needs to be looked <strong>in</strong>to with regard to this type of<br />

longitud<strong>in</strong>al analysis is the validity of comparisons, particularly when we know, as<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>g section, the limitations, weaknesses and <strong>in</strong>consistencies<br />

that characterised the early 1970s and 1980s studies and their methodologies: How<br />

is it possible to compare those statistical date like for like over a period spann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

three decades? Do those comparisons take <strong>in</strong>to account the chang<strong>in</strong>g nature of the<br />

television programm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> general and programmes with<strong>in</strong> the family hours <strong>in</strong><br />

particular? Do they take <strong>in</strong>to account the actual contexts with<strong>in</strong> which sexual<br />

portrayals occurred and the narratives that lend mean<strong>in</strong>gs to them? To what extent<br />

can one consider the samples studies representative of one TV seasons let alone of<br />

three decades‘ TV output, and are the <strong>in</strong>dividual samples comparable? The study<br />

does not seem to have addressed those issues. However what it has done was to<br />

collapse the statistical data from three decades <strong>in</strong>to comparable categories. Overall,<br />

while those f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs provide a basel<strong>in</strong>e for comparisons, albeit quantitative ones, to<br />

track the chang<strong>in</strong>g nature of family hour TV <strong>in</strong> terms of the prevalence of depiction<br />

of sex, these should not be taken at face value.<br />

2.1.2.2 <strong>Soap</strong> <strong>Operas</strong><br />

Like the content analysis studies conducted <strong>in</strong> the 1970s and 1980s, content<br />

analyses of soap opera‘s sex and sexuality <strong>in</strong> the 1990s still focused on daytime,<br />

rather than prime-time soap operas, as the greatest concentration of young viewers<br />

was normally found dur<strong>in</strong>g daytime and lead<strong>in</strong>g up to the family hour view<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(Greenberg and Busselle, 1994).<br />

In one of the 1990s‘ earlier studies, Olson (1994) content analysed two weeks<br />

worth of three US television networks‘ (ABC, CBS, and NBC) daytime soap<br />

operas. The sample was selected randomly from the 1989 and 1990 seasons to cover<br />

ten weekdays, and produced a total of 105 hours of soap operas episodes. The study<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!