INFORME DEL SEMINARIO REGIONAL

EVALUATION OF THE SEMINAR
(Based upon a questionnaire filled in by the participants at the end of the seminar)
I. QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF SPECIFIC ITEMS
From the most satisfactory (5) to
the least satisfactory (1)
5
(a)
4
(b)
3
(c)
2
(d)
1
(e)
Answers
(Number)
(f)
No
answer
(g)
TOTAL
QUESTION
NAIRES
(f) + (g)
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
(*)
Logistical organisation 22 15 6 2 5 50 11 61 3.94
Quality of accommodation 21 16 4 1 2 44 17 61 4.20
Registration and Information 15 21 19 3 58 3 61 3.83
Achievement of the seminar’s
objectives
3 23 21 7 2 56 5 61 3.32
Use of time 7 29 20 5 61 61 3.62
Possibility to clarify questions
and doubts
4 28 22 5 59 2 61 3.53
Interest generated by the
discussions
13 26 16 4 1 60 1 61 3.77
Possibility to exchange ideas
and experiences
19 24 14 4 61 61 3.95
General weighted average of
the seminar (all items)
3.77
(*) Weighted average = [ (a) x 5 + (b) x 4 + (c) x 3 + (d) x 2 + (e) x1 ] / (f)
II. EVALUATION OF THE PARTICIPANTS’ GLOBAL SATISFACTION
Hypothesis : the persons who have quoted the items at 5, 4 and 3 are “satisfied”
From the most satisfactory (5) to
the least satisfactory (1)
5 4 3
Total 5+4+3
Logistical organisation 22 15 6 43
(a)
Answers
(b) (*)
50
%
Satisfaction
(a) / (b)
86,00 %
Quality of accommodation 21 16 4 41 44 93,18 %
Registration and Information 15 21 19 55 58 94,83 %
Achievement of the seminar’s
objectives
3 23 21 47 56 83,93 %
Use of time 7 29 20 56 61 91,80 %
Possibility to clarify questions
and doubts
Interest generated by the
discussions
Possibility to exchange ideas
and experiences
4 28 22 44 59 91,53 %
13 26 16 55 60 91,67 %
19 24 14 57 61 93,44 %
Global average (all items) 90,80 %
(*) Corresponds to the column (f) of the above table
81