13.01.2013 Views

How Do Corporate Venture Capitalists Create Value for ...

How Do Corporate Venture Capitalists Create Value for ...

How Do Corporate Venture Capitalists Create Value for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IVC backing dummy, and the reputation of existing IVCs, and measures of participation by various other<br />

market players.. As control variables we employ size (log of total assets), share of firm equity sold in the<br />

IPO, various operating per<strong>for</strong>mance characteristics of IPO firms, industry dummies, and year dummies.<br />

We find that the presence of CVC backing an IPO firm increases the valuation of this firm at the<br />

offer price (relative to an industry peer) by 35% on average. Similarly, each additional CVC backing the<br />

entrepreneurial firm going public causes on average 13% increase in valuation. Finally, the backing by an<br />

additional CVC with its corporate parent in the same Fama-French industry as the IPO firm increases this<br />

firms’ valuation by roughly 11%.<br />

Our univariate and multivariate analysis of IPO firms’ valuation at both offer price and the secondary<br />

market price suggest that corporate venture capitalists are able to credibly convey the in<strong>for</strong>mation about<br />

future prospect of the IPO firms backed by them to both IPO and secondary market participants. Further,<br />

the higher valuation assigned by the IPO market to CVC backed firms may reflects the higher value of<br />

their growth options relative to that of IVCs backed IPO firms.<br />

8.4 Long-Run Post-IPO Stock Returns of CVC Backed and IVC Backed Firms<br />

The higher valuation awarded to CVC backed firms relative to IVC backed firms at the IPO and<br />

secondary market may arise from temporary misvaluation in the equity market rather than from the<br />

superior ability of CVCs to communicate the true value of firms backed by them to various equity market<br />

participants. In the <strong>for</strong>mer scenario, however, one would expect CVC backed firms to underper<strong>for</strong>m IVC<br />

backed firms in terms of long-run stock returns, as the temporary misevaluations are corrected over time.<br />

We there<strong>for</strong>e compare the five year stock return per<strong>for</strong>mance of CVC backed and IVC backed firms to<br />

rule out the misvaluation scenario.<br />

We compare the intercepts of the Fama and French (1993) three-factor model based on the calendar-<br />

time monthly portfolio returns of CVC backed and IVC backed IPO firms. We construct the calendar-<br />

time portfolio returns by averaging monthly returns of firms that went public within 60 month of the<br />

return date. Table 8 present the results of our analysis. Following earlier stock return studies, along with<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!