Transatlantic Armaments Cooperation - Federation of American ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

1. General Memorandum of Understanding Concerning General Arrangements for the Collaborative Development and Production of a Modular Stand- Off Weapon, July 1987. 2. Supplement No. 1 to the Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Collaborative Project Definition Phase of the Modular Stand-Off Weapon System, Draft, Nov. 10, 1988. 3. MSOW IPO/CC Letter, Jan. 24, 1990, Lessons Learned, Appendix 1, “Some Special Topics,” Attachments 6-7, MSD/MSOW IPO Program Office Support Agreement. REFERENCES I-8 4. MSOW IPO/CC Letter, Jan. 24, 1990, Lessons Learned, Appendix 1, “Some Special Topics,” Attachment 3, MSOW IPO Organization. 5. MSOW IPO/CC Letter, Jan. 24, 1990, Lessons Learned, Appendix 1, “Some Special Topics,” Attachment 2, MSOW IPO Organization in the PD Phase. 6. Addendum to Lessons Learned on Modular Stand- Off Weapon (MSOW). 7. Ibid.
APPENDIX J EXAMPLES OF EUROPEAN DEFENSE COMPANY TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATIVE ACTIVITIES J-1
Page 2 and 3:
xviii
Page 4 and 5:
DISCLAIMER This book was produced i
Page 6 and 7:
NOTICE Copies of this report may be
Page 8 and 9:
PART II - TRANSATLANTIC AND INTRA-E
Page 10 and 11:
Technology Transfer................
Page 12 and 13:
PREFACE This publication presents t
Page 14 and 15:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Objective: To pro
Page 16 and 17:
INTRODUCTION “An unidentified pro
Page 18 and 19:
xvi
Page 20 and 21:
xviii
Page 22 and 23:
international programs, work share
Page 24 and 25:
the genesis for the harmonization o
Page 26 and 27:
later in the program. Currently, KP
Page 28 and 29:
For cooperative development program
Page 30 and 31:
When negotiations are completed, th
Page 32 and 33:
1. Interview with Frank Kenlon, Off
Page 34 and 35:
The definitions of terms that are t
Page 36 and 37:
Export Control/Technology Transfer
Page 38 and 39:
using first class or parcel post. I
Page 40 and 41:
If a disclosure is deemed to be in
Page 42 and 43:
Its preparation must involve all pr
Page 44 and 45:
Security Service, IAPs that have in
Page 46 and 47:
For Official Use Only (FOUO) inform
Page 48 and 49:
2-16
Page 50 and 51:
2-18
Page 52 and 53:
fight together in a potential confl
Page 54 and 55:
the most optimistic and proved the
Page 56 and 57:
spending on R&D between Europe and
Page 58 and 59:
that requirements can be addressed
Page 60 and 61:
1. Farr, Charles Michael, An Invest
Page 62 and 63:
Each of these programs will be asse
Page 64 and 65:
European production did not start u
Page 66 and 67:
involved in MLRS production. It gre
Page 68 and 69:
estructure there were no more cost
Page 70 and 71:
Background GUIDED MLRS (GMLRS) ROCK
Page 72 and 73:
cooperation continues. The GMLRS pr
Page 74 and 75:
In May of 1967, NNAG approved the P
Page 76 and 77:
costs may be waived in part or in w
Page 78 and 79:
Background ROLLING AIRFRAME MISSILE
Page 80 and 81:
The CPA provided a specific answer
Page 82 and 83:
Europeans are also accustomed to a
Page 84 and 85:
Link-16 enables secure, jam-resista
Page 86 and 87:
Command (SPAWAR) contracting person
Page 88 and 89:
team was still able to compress the
Page 90 and 91:
Program objectives are outlined in
Page 92 and 93:
Initial operational capability was
Page 94 and 95:
oversight for European audit bodies
Page 96 and 97:
and specifically allowed the access
Page 98 and 99:
Management Structure The FTMA manag
Page 100 and 101:
Background JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JS
Page 102 and 103:
limited partners are provided acces
Page 104 and 105:
of levels and is tailored to the ne
Page 106 and 107:
These transatlantic cooperative pro
Page 108 and 109:
• Human Dimension - Selection of
Page 110 and 111:
4-50 ROLLING AIRFRAME MISSILE (RAM)
Page 112 and 113:
MLRS 1. Multiple Launch Rocket Syst
Page 114 and 115:
16. Ibid, pp 13-14 17. Ibid, p. 15.
Page 116 and 117:
JSF 1. David Mulholland, “Debate
Page 118 and 119:
4-58
Page 120 and 121:
It has been observed that U.S. arms
Page 122 and 123:
success for exclusively European co
Page 124 and 125:
Germany The German acquisition syst
Page 126 and 127:
increases the incentive to find par
Page 128 and 129:
can be traced to the early 1970s. O
Page 130 and 131:
1. Interview with a U.S. officer as
Page 132 and 133:
5-14
Page 134 and 135:
atlanticism among mid-level officia
Page 136 and 137:
Europeans often perceive a differen
Page 138 and 139:
components follow a standard format
Page 140 and 141:
the actual savings are difficult to
Page 142 and 143: 1. John Vincour, “France Has a Ha
Page 144 and 145: cases to unstable nations that may
Page 146 and 147: the U.S. DoD is attempting to reach
Page 148 and 149: 7-6
Page 150 and 151: A-2
Page 152 and 153: 5. Project Management • Briefly d
Page 154 and 155: A-6
Page 156 and 157: B-2
Page 158 and 159: F. Hand Carry. The hand carrying of
Page 160 and 161: C-2
Page 162 and 163: C-4
Page 164 and 165: D-2
Page 166 and 167: D-4
Page 168 and 169: E-2
Page 170 and 171: E-4
Page 172 and 173: F-2
Page 174 and 175: I. MISWG Document Number 10, “Tra
Page 176 and 177: F-6
Page 178 and 179: G-2
Page 180 and 181: G-4
Page 182 and 183: H-2
Page 184 and 185: November 14, 1994 WEU Ministers iss
Page 186 and 187: I-2
Page 188 and 189: When I came to the program in Septe
Page 190 and 191: • Second, even if the U.S. employ
Page 194 and 195: J-2
Page 196 and 197: Horizon Direction des Constructions
Page 198 and 199: K-2
Page 200 and 201: DCI Defense Capabilities Initiative
Page 202 and 203: MIDS Multifunctional Information Di
Page 204 and 205: STANAG Standardization Agreement ST
Page 206 and 207: L-2
Page 208 and 209: Susan Ludlow McMurray Director Inte
Page 210 and 211: BDir Gerhard Coors Chief, Missiles,
Page 212 and 213: Captain Mike Nixon Deputy Director
Page 214 and 215: Richard McCarthy Tank Main Armament
Page 216 and 217: LTC Ray Nulk, USA Office of the Dep
Page 218 and 219: L-14
Page 220 and 221: M-2
Page 222 and 223: Challands, Guy. Sense About Europea
Page 224 and 225: Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Page 226 and 227: M-8
Page 228 and 229: N-2
Page 230:
N-4
show all

Transatlantic Armaments Cooperation - Federation of American ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?