16.01.2013 Views

Stave River Water Use Plan - BC Hydro

Stave River Water Use Plan - BC Hydro

Stave River Water Use Plan - BC Hydro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Stave</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Monitoring Terms of Reference June 13, 2005<br />

Hypothesis H08 establishes the primary pathway by which carbon and other<br />

nutrients enter the food web, and reflects the general growing conditions of<br />

phytoplankton. A predominance of ultra-phytoplankton tends to indicate poorer growing<br />

conditions, which collectively include the influences nutrient levels, water temperature,<br />

light availability etc. (Wetzel 2001). Conversely, a predominance of micro-phytoplankton<br />

indicates an excellent growing environment.<br />

Hypothesis H09 explores the linkage between primary production and fish<br />

production by examining the size structure of zooplankton (secondary production). Of<br />

importance is the density of larger organisms that tend to constitute the majority of<br />

pelagic fish food production.<br />

Hypothesis H010 is an independent test of the impact hypothesis model as it<br />

pertains to the WUP Combo 6 operating strategy.<br />

1.4 Key <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Use</strong> Decision Affected<br />

In the absence of reliable predictions on the effect of dam operations on <strong>Stave</strong><br />

reservoir productivity, it was assumed that pelagic productivity would remain unchanged<br />

over the spectrum of feasible reservoir operating strategies. However, the CC<br />

recognised that there was considerable uncertainty in this assumption, but had no<br />

information with which to form other, more probable outcomes. This monitor is designed<br />

to:<br />

a) Test the validity of this assumption of no operational impact, and confirm that<br />

pelagic conditions have not worsened with the new Combo 6 operating strategy.<br />

b) Provide the information necessary to promote a better understanding of the<br />

pathways by which operational changes can affect primary productivity (the<br />

chosen indicator variable of fish productivity), and in turn provide better<br />

predictions of operational impacts for future WUP reviews.<br />

In addition, this monitor attempts to develop a better linkage between the effect<br />

of reservoir operations on primary productivity and the potential for fish production.<br />

Collectively, this information will lead to conclusions regarding the expected<br />

benefits of the Combo 6 operating strategy, and whether alternative strategies should be<br />

proposed if these benefits are not realised. Through a better understanding of reservoir<br />

ecosystem dynamics, its may be possible to find improvements to the Combo 6<br />

operating strategy that may increase operational flexibility without compromising<br />

reservoir ecosystem function. Specific actions that may lead to such improvements<br />

cannot be identified at this time because of the complexity of the <strong>Stave</strong> Lake project.<br />

The complex modelling exercises needed to identify such actions is beyond the scope of<br />

this monitor and should be reserved for future WUP processes.<br />

<strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> Page 10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!