20.01.2013 Views

Economics of Kautiliya Shukra and Brihaspati.pmd

Economics of Kautiliya Shukra and Brihaspati.pmd

Economics of Kautiliya Shukra and Brihaspati.pmd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Regulation <strong>of</strong> Trade <strong>and</strong> Protection <strong>of</strong> Consumers<br />

Trade <strong>and</strong> commerce were regulated in public interest.<br />

Panyadhyaksa (The Superintendent <strong>of</strong> Commerce), who was state<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer, appointed to promote <strong>and</strong> regulate trade had to control prices<br />

<strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it so that common man was not hurt. Commodities which<br />

were freely available <strong>and</strong> essential for day-to-day use were allowed to<br />

be freely traded. Consumers were protected against cornering <strong>and</strong><br />

hoarding <strong>of</strong> goods. Traders found cheating or deceiving consumers<br />

were heavily punished. Market hours were regulated. Weighs <strong>and</strong><br />

measures were st<strong>and</strong>ardized. Wages were prescribed for different types<br />

<strong>of</strong> jobs. Good workers given incentives while those not performing<br />

well were penalized. (Kautilya's Arthashastra, 1967, 2.26)<br />

International Trade<br />

Kautilya advocated the promotion <strong>of</strong> international trade <strong>and</strong><br />

commerce. Imported goods were allowed to be sold in the market<br />

through distribution centers under control <strong>of</strong> the Superintendent <strong>of</strong><br />

Market. The margin <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it was kept reasonable as it was thought<br />

that high margins would be determined to the people. Foreign traders<br />

we rot to be harassed. In case <strong>of</strong> a dispute between a local <strong>and</strong> a<br />

foreign businessman, it was not advisable for the later to go to court.<br />

Mutual settlements were preferred.<br />

The Superintendent <strong>of</strong> Commerce was required to protect the<br />

interest <strong>of</strong> businessman going abroad to sell the goods produced in the<br />

country. In case <strong>of</strong> emergency he was supposed to help them. Most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the trade during those days was through roadways. Waterwaysrivers<br />

<strong>and</strong> seas was second important transportation. Traders were<br />

supposed to have fair knowledge <strong>of</strong> the routes <strong>and</strong> the people with<br />

53<br />

whom they had to deal in foreign markets.(Ibid) Export <strong>of</strong> the items<br />

banned was punishable with fine <strong>and</strong> seizure <strong>of</strong> goods. Such items<br />

include selected armaments, chariots, precious metals, food grains,<br />

<strong>and</strong> livestock. Foreign goods useful to the country were allowed without<br />

any restrictions. But the entry <strong>of</strong> goods harmful to people was strictly<br />

prohibited. (<strong>Shukra</strong>nitisar, 2008, 1.128) The traders required to<br />

disclose full identity <strong>of</strong> goods at the entry gate. Customs certification<br />

was a must. Spies were appointed to collect details about the goods<br />

entering into the borders. Concealment <strong>of</strong> facts was reported by them.<br />

If traders failed to pay the duty asked for goods were seized. Customs duty<br />

on important goods was called pravesya. One fifth <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

products was charged as pravesya.(<strong>Kautiliya</strong> Arthashastram, 2009, 2.22)<br />

Transportation<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> transport was state responsibility. Road<br />

transport developement was responsibiity <strong>of</strong> village heads, mayors <strong>and</strong><br />

The Superintedent <strong>of</strong> New settlements. Different types <strong>of</strong> roads <strong>and</strong><br />

their width as recomended by <strong>Shukra</strong> <strong>and</strong> Kautilya is presented in the<br />

table 4.1.<br />

Table 4.1. Road width in <strong>Kautiliya</strong> Arthashastra <strong>and</strong> <strong>Shukra</strong>-niti<br />

Road <strong>Shukra</strong>-niti <strong>Kautiliya</strong> Arthashastra<br />

High way 45 ft. 48 ft<br />

Link road 30 ft. 48 ft.<br />

City road 22 ½ ft. 24 ft.<br />

City-village link road 15 ft. 13 ½ ft.<br />

Source: (a) <strong>Shukra</strong>nitisar, 2008,1.262-64<br />

(b) Kautilya's Arthashastra, 1967, 2.4<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!