Economics of Kautiliya Shukra and Brihaspati.pmd
Economics of Kautiliya Shukra and Brihaspati.pmd
Economics of Kautiliya Shukra and Brihaspati.pmd
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
high. I think it unlikely that anyone would pay a correspondingly high<br />
price to have his lawn mowed in that fashion'.<br />
'This puzzle – the relation between value to the consumer,<br />
cost <strong>of</strong> production, <strong>and</strong> price- was solved a little over 100 years ago.<br />
The answer is that price equals both cost <strong>of</strong> production <strong>and</strong> value to<br />
the user, both <strong>of</strong> which must therefore be equal to each other'.<br />
(Friedman,1990, Section 3, Chapter 2)<br />
Price Theory in Wealth <strong>of</strong> Nations<br />
Initial theories <strong>of</strong> value were based on labor theory. Adam<br />
Smith used the word value in two senses. Sometimes he used this<br />
word to denote utility <strong>and</strong> sometimes to denote market price. According<br />
to him, 'The one may be called value in use the other value in exchange.<br />
The things which have the greatest value in use have frequently little<br />
or no value in exchange, <strong>and</strong> on the contrary those which have the<br />
greatest value in use have frequently little or no value in use. Nothing is<br />
more useful than water but it will purchase scarce anything scarce<br />
anything can be had in exchange for it, a diamond on the contrary has<br />
scarce any value in use but a very greatest quantity <strong>of</strong> other goods<br />
may frequently be had in exchange for it'. (Wealth <strong>of</strong> Nations, Book<br />
1, Chapter IV) Value in exchange is the relative proportion with<br />
which the commodity is exchanged for another commodity (in other<br />
words, its price in the case <strong>of</strong> money). According to Smith, labour is<br />
the real measure <strong>of</strong> the exchangeable value <strong>of</strong> all commodities. (ibid,<br />
Book 1, Chapter V)<br />
He argued, 'The real price <strong>of</strong> everything, what everything really<br />
costs to the man who wants to acquire it, is the toil <strong>and</strong> trouble <strong>of</strong><br />
acquiring it.' (ibid) Smith further stresses in the following words,<br />
64<br />
'However even a person drinking water from a good stream at his<br />
doorstep must spend labour to gain this value, at least if this action is<br />
relevant to economics'.<br />
'In the example <strong>of</strong> person going to a stream at his doorstep, if<br />
this is a pleasant activity, it is not labor. If it is not pleasant it could be<br />
relevant to economics....' (ibid)<br />
Price Theory in Manu-smriti<br />
Price theory/policy has been explained in Manu-smriti clearly.<br />
Manu’s suggestions for price policy is given as follows-<br />
1.Compare the value <strong>of</strong> commodities purchased <strong>and</strong><br />
commodities sold, estimate its loss <strong>of</strong> value <strong>and</strong> then determine the<br />
price <strong>of</strong> that commodity.<br />
2.The price should be determined in such a way that both side<br />
buyer <strong>and</strong> seller should be satisfied. After every five nights or in each<br />
fortnight prices should be revised regularly. 1 (Manu-smriti, 8.410-11)<br />
Manu further says that the policy making for price<br />
determination should be done by a market expert- Arghavit. Thus, in<br />
the times <strong>of</strong> Manu market experts were appointed as economic advisers<br />
<strong>of</strong> the state.<br />
Price Theory in <strong>Shukra</strong>-niti<br />
In <strong>Shukra</strong>-niti foundations <strong>of</strong> modern cost concepts are found.<br />
The concepts <strong>of</strong> real cost, alternative cost <strong>and</strong> money cost have been<br />
explained clearly. <strong>Shukra</strong> states that the sacrifices, expenses, <strong>and</strong> causes<br />
used to produce a commodity is its cost. 2 (<strong>Shukra</strong>-niti, 2000, 2.146)<br />
One can find that this concept is similar to the real cost concept given<br />
by Marshall. Similarly, <strong>Shukra</strong> defines the total cost <strong>of</strong> production as<br />
the summation <strong>of</strong> the following-<br />
65