21.01.2013 Views

The Kolb Learning Style Inventory—Version 3.1 2005 - Whitewater ...

The Kolb Learning Style Inventory—Version 3.1 2005 - Whitewater ...

The Kolb Learning Style Inventory—Version 3.1 2005 - Whitewater ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nursing. Stiernborg, Zaldivar, and Santiago (1996) conducted a pre-test post-test quasi-experimental design study<br />

to assess the comparative effectiveness of didactic teaching and experiential learning in a HIV/AIDS training program<br />

for nursing students in the Philippines. <strong>The</strong> program focused on improvement of HIV/AIDS knowledge levels<br />

and attitudinal change toward HIV/AIDS patients. <strong>The</strong> authors hypothesized that experiential learning would yield<br />

signifi cantly higher knowledge levels and favorable attitude changes in the students than didactic teaching. Three<br />

groups of nursing students participated in the study: the fi rst group received didactic teaching in the form of lectures,<br />

while the second group had training with an experiential learning approach. Both groups included participation by a<br />

person with HIV/AIDS. <strong>The</strong> third group served as a control group and did not receive any formal HIV/AIDS training.<br />

<strong>The</strong> didactic and experiential groups covered the same content, including AIDS epidemiology, infection control,<br />

socio-ethical issues related to HIV infection, and nursing care of patients in the hospital and community. <strong>The</strong> didactic<br />

group had a two-hour presentation by the instructors, followed by a 30-minute Q & A session on the presentation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> session fi nished with 30 minutes with an AIDS patient. <strong>The</strong> experiential learning group had the presentation<br />

and discussion of a number of short case situations and a number of role-plays with student participation. <strong>The</strong> session<br />

ended with 30 minutes with an AIDS patient. Knowledge post-test scores indicate that both didactic and experiential<br />

learning approach produced a signifi cant increase in the students’ knowledge levels. However, the experiential learning<br />

group achieved a signifi cantly higher knowledge level than the didactic group. While both groups reduced fear of<br />

attracting HIV (an indication of a positive attitude change), only the experiential learning group showed a consistent<br />

positive change on all attitudinal scales.<br />

<strong>The</strong> authors concluded that the experiential learning approach was more effective than the didactic approach for<br />

knowledge acquisition in fi ve signifi cant ways: fi rst, the problem-posed approach prompted students to get actively<br />

involved in the learning process through role-play. Second, it emphasized personal involvement through refl ection.<br />

Third, the cases refl ected the real world and encouraged integration of theory and policy and their practical applications.<br />

Fourth, the experiential learning session was fl exible and learner centered. Fifth, the participation of an AIDS<br />

patient formed an integral part of the experiential learning session, whereas in the didactic session, the lecture, the Q<br />

& A session, and the patient with HIV-AIDS testimonial were separate parts with no opportunity for integration.<br />

Medicine. Cleave-Hogg and Morgan (2002) designed an anesthesia simulation based on experiential learning for<br />

undergraduate medical students. Students reported high levels of satisfaction with the anesthesia simulation experience<br />

based on three grounds: 1) it provides opportunity to activate relevant prior knowledge and raise awareness of the gaps<br />

in their knowledge, 2) offers a learning context that closely resembles a real-life anesthesia practice, and 3) provides<br />

freedom to integrate their knowledge, to improve their skills, and to exercise their judgment without endangering a<br />

patient. <strong>The</strong> authors contend that the results of the study support the value of integrating the experiential simulation<br />

exercise in the anesthesia undergraduate curriculum.<br />

Sandmire and Boyce (2004) investigated the performance of two-person collaborative problem-solving teams in an<br />

allied health education anatomy, physiology, and pathology course. <strong>The</strong>y compared a group of high abstract/high<br />

concrete student pairs with a group of abstract pairs and a group of concrete pairs. <strong>The</strong> abstract/concrete pairs performed<br />

signifi cantly better on a simulated clinical case than did the abstract pairs and slightly better than the concrete<br />

pairs, indicating the value of integrating the abstract and concrete dialectics of the learning cycle. However, a similar<br />

study by Sandmire, Vroman, and Sanders (2000) investigating pairs formed on the action/refl ection dialectic showed<br />

no signifi cant performance differences.<br />

Psychiatry. Milne, James, Keegan, and Dudley developed an empirical method of assessing the effectiveness of mental<br />

health trainers’ transaction patterns and their impact on student learning. <strong>The</strong> instrument, Teacher’s PETS (Process<br />

Evaluation of Training and Supervision), was derived through operationalization of the experiential learning theory<br />

with the main purpose of providing empirically valid and reliable data on the trainers’ behaviors during training sessions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> instrument was designed around the four dimensions of the learning cycle and “is an explicitly transactional<br />

one in which learners play an essential role in relation to the trainers, who will be at times responsive and at times<br />

proactive” (2000: 189) in any given learning situation. <strong>The</strong> key feature of the model, the authors suggest, is the fl uid,<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!