pdf - Swinburne University of Technology
pdf - Swinburne University of Technology
pdf - Swinburne University of Technology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Swinburne</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Cycle 2 AUQA audit portfolio Page 17<br />
During 2007, the Vice-Chancellor presented a discussion paper to Academic Board, aimed<br />
at clarifying the role <strong>of</strong> the Board in relation to <strong>University</strong> management and strengthening its<br />
role in academic governance. This triggered a self-review <strong>of</strong> the Board, led by the Chair, and<br />
thence to significant improvements including:<br />
w annual joint meetings <strong>of</strong> the Academic Board, Board <strong>of</strong> TAFE Studies and <strong>University</strong><br />
Council (with the first such meeting conducted in 2007)<br />
w establishment <strong>of</strong> an ex <strong>of</strong>ficio position on the Board for the PVC Sarawak<br />
(instituted in 2007)<br />
w receipt and consideration by the Board <strong>of</strong> regular academic performance reports, prepared<br />
by Strategic Planning and Quality, including time-series data for measures <strong>of</strong> demand,<br />
load, progression, attrition, student satisfaction, graduate employment and graduate<br />
satisfaction – with data presented by broad field <strong>of</strong> education and for specific student<br />
cohorts, and with comparative data for other Australian universities (with such reports<br />
instituted in 2007)<br />
w receipt and consideration by the Board <strong>of</strong> annual research and research training<br />
performance reports (with such reports instituted in 2007)<br />
w receipt and consideration by the Board <strong>of</strong> annual transnational education (TNE)<br />
quality reports (with such reports to be instituted in 2008)<br />
w receipt and consideration by the Board <strong>of</strong> annual reports on assessment & appeals<br />
(with such reports to be instituted in 2008)<br />
Priorities for action<br />
2. Clarify the role <strong>of</strong> the Academic<br />
Programs Quality Committee.<br />
3. Clarify the relationship between<br />
the Academic Board and faculty<br />
academic committees in regard to<br />
academic governance.<br />
4. Strengthen the role <strong>of</strong> Academic<br />
Board in monitoring academic quality<br />
with respect to the <strong>University</strong>’s<br />
diverse international activity<br />
(Sections 5.2 – 5.5).