29.01.2013 Views

1.2. institutional framework of twinning operations in armenia - PAO

1.2. institutional framework of twinning operations in armenia - PAO

1.2. institutional framework of twinning operations in armenia - PAO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GUIDELINES ON TWINNING INSTRUMENT FOR PROGRAMME ADMINISTRATION AGENCY<br />

Registration and <strong>in</strong>itial screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the Tw<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g proposals: Interested EU member states<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the period specified <strong>in</strong> the Call for Proposals submit their proposals to the ECD to Armenia.<br />

The ECD distributes the requests to the <strong>PAO</strong> and the BA.<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> <strong>PAO</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g this phase:<br />

As all other stakeholders (ECD and BA) the <strong>PAO</strong> makes an adm<strong>in</strong>istrative compliance and<br />

eligibility check <strong>of</strong> the proposals follow<strong>in</strong>g the adopted form (see Annex 4). This check is to verify<br />

whether the proposals comply with adm<strong>in</strong>istrative formal requirements, i.e. all necessary<br />

documents are submitted, and <strong>in</strong> correct format, and that Project Leader and RTA are eligible.<br />

Evaluation and selection <strong>of</strong> proposals:<br />

The representatives <strong>of</strong> MSs which have submitted eligible proposals are <strong>in</strong>vited to make oral<br />

presentations at the Tw<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g selection meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Yerevan. On the basis <strong>of</strong> the written proposals<br />

and oral presentations, a special selection Committee composed <strong>of</strong> representatives from the ECD<br />

and the BA makes a decision on a Tw<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g partner. The assessment <strong>of</strong> proposals submitted by<br />

EU MS is made <strong>in</strong> accordance with a standard evaluation grid (cf. Annex 7, and Annex C8 <strong>of</strong><br />

Tw<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g Manual).<br />

The selection Committee is composed <strong>of</strong> a non-vot<strong>in</strong>g Chairman and Secretary, and at least 3<br />

vot<strong>in</strong>g members. The Chairman and the Secretary, as well as at least 2 vot<strong>in</strong>g members (out <strong>of</strong> 3)<br />

are Representatives <strong>of</strong> ECD to Armenia. At least one vot<strong>in</strong>g member represents the beneficiary<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitution, and this person should preferably be the Project Leader.<br />

Additionally, the RTA Counterpart, <strong>PAO</strong> representatives and/or other EC <strong>of</strong>ficers may attend the<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>gs as observers without vot<strong>in</strong>g right.<br />

Generally this stage takes 3-5 months – from the moment <strong>of</strong> the Call for Proposals to notification <strong>of</strong><br />

the Evaluation Committee.<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> <strong>PAO</strong>:<br />

The <strong>PAO</strong> director should attend the meet<strong>in</strong>gs with observer status without vot<strong>in</strong>g right. At the<br />

same time the <strong>PAO</strong> may provide methodological support and consultation before conduct<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

evaluation and selection.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!