30.01.2013 Views

A Guide for Terrestrial Gastropod Identification - University of ...

A Guide for Terrestrial Gastropod Identification - University of ...

A Guide for Terrestrial Gastropod Identification - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Phylogeny and Classification <strong>of</strong> North American <strong>Terrestrial</strong><br />

<strong>Gastropod</strong>s<br />

Kevin J. Roe, Iowa State <strong>University</strong><br />

After the Arthropoda, the Mollusca is considered to be the second most diverse <strong>of</strong> all<br />

metazoan phyla, and the gastropods represent the most diverse group <strong>of</strong> mollusks consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

~80% <strong>of</strong> all mollusks (~80,000 species). It is perhaps no great surprise then that the<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> such a large and diverse group <strong>of</strong> organisms has continued to change over the<br />

years. In general, these changes have reflected our improved understanding <strong>of</strong> the evolutionary<br />

relationships <strong>of</strong> gastropods. The past several decades have witnessed some dramatic shifts in our<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the relationships <strong>of</strong> the major gastropod lineages, and with them the placement<br />

and relationships <strong>of</strong> terrestrial snails. An understanding <strong>of</strong> the changes that have taken place in<br />

the classification <strong>of</strong> terrestrial snails will prove to be invaluable when attempting to reconcile the<br />

names and associated in<strong>for</strong>mation contained in recent publications with that found in older, but<br />

still very important ones.<br />

In order to fully appreciate the value <strong>of</strong> a taxonomic classification, it is paramount to<br />

realize that classifications schemes are, first and <strong>for</strong>emost, in<strong>for</strong>mation retrieval systems. The<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation they convey is <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> relationships (all the species in a genus should be more<br />

closely related to each other than to species in other genera, and likewise <strong>for</strong> genera within<br />

families) that is arranged hierarchically. By looking at a classification one should be able to<br />

understand something about the where the organism <strong>of</strong> interest fits within this hierarchy. In<br />

more modern classifications, there has been some movement away from the use <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

rankings (class, order, suborder etc.). This fact should not cause any great concern, because what<br />

is most important is the relative position <strong>of</strong> taxa within the hierarchy, not the categorical rank<br />

associated with it.<br />

Traditionally, gastropods were classified based on the presence and position <strong>of</strong> their<br />

respiratory apparatus into three groups: Prosobranchia (gills in-front <strong>of</strong> the heart),<br />

Opisthobranchia (gills behind the heart), and Pulmonata (lack gills, but use a highly vascularized<br />

mantle <strong>for</strong> respiration). While convenient, this classification has been recognized to not reflect<br />

the evolutionary relationships <strong>of</strong> gastropods (a misleading in<strong>for</strong>mation retrieval system) and has<br />

been abandoned in favor <strong>of</strong> classifications based on the objective analysis <strong>of</strong> both morphological<br />

(e.g. Salvini-Plawen and Steiner, 1996; Ponder and Lindberg, 1997; Dayrat and Tillier, 2002)<br />

and DNA (e.g. Tillier and Ponder, 1992; Dayrat et al. 2001) data. Current classifications place<br />

pulmonates and opisthobranchs together in the clade Euthyneura. This group together with<br />

pyramidelids and related snails <strong>for</strong>m the Heterobranchia. Those interested in exploring higherlevel<br />

gastropod systematics should consult the publications listed in this summary in particular,<br />

Bieler (1992) and Ponder and Lindberg (1997). The use <strong>of</strong> ever more sophisticated methods <strong>of</strong><br />

analysis and high-tech tools has resulted in a refinement <strong>of</strong> our knowledge <strong>of</strong> the relationships <strong>of</strong><br />

gastropods, but, despite these improvements our understanding is far from complete and still<br />

very much in a state <strong>of</strong> flux. The only way to improve the current state <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> these<br />

relationships is to continue to collect and analyze data, and just as importantly, to continue to<br />

train researchers to be able to locate and identify gastropods.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!