02.02.2013 Views

MSR 2002-2 - Public Service Commission of West Virginia

MSR 2002-2 - Public Service Commission of West Virginia

MSR 2002-2 - Public Service Commission of West Virginia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> — Management Summary Report<br />

<strong>West</strong> <strong>Virginia</strong>-American Water Company - American Water Works, Inc. is the parent<br />

company <strong>of</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>Virginia</strong>-American Water Company. In late <strong>2002</strong>, the PSC granted its consent<br />

for Thames Water Aqua Holdings GmbH to acquire all <strong>of</strong> American Water’s stock. On May 8,<br />

2006, in Case No. 06-0597-W-PC. Thames Gmbh asked the PSC’s consent to sell American<br />

Water’s stock on the New York Stock Exchange, which would result in American Water<br />

becoming the largest publicly-traded water company in the United States. In early December,<br />

the <strong>Commission</strong> conducted a hearing on this request. As <strong>of</strong> this report, the parties are filing<br />

briefs for the <strong>Commission</strong>’s consideration.<br />

Pocahontas County <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> District - In Case No. 05-0103-PSD-CN, the District<br />

filed an application for a certificate <strong>of</strong> convenience and necessity for the construction,<br />

acquisition, operation and maintenance <strong>of</strong> a wastewater treatment and collection system to<br />

service approximately 1,981 customers in Linwood, Slaty Fork, Snowshoe, Silver Creek and<br />

Hawthorne Valley areas <strong>of</strong> Pocahontas County. A Recommended Decision granting the<br />

application contingent upon the receipt <strong>of</strong> all necessary local, state and federal permits was<br />

entered in the matter on December 12, 2005.Two intervenors filed exceptions to the<br />

Recommended Decision. The <strong>Commission</strong> entered a final order adopting the Recommended<br />

Decision on February 21, 2006. Intervenor Thomas Shipley filed an appeal with the Supreme<br />

Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals on March 23 ,2006. The Court refused to hear the petition for appeal on<br />

September 6, 2006.<br />

Page 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!