MSR 2002-2 - Public Service Commission of West Virginia
MSR 2002-2 - Public Service Commission of West Virginia
MSR 2002-2 - Public Service Commission of West Virginia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> — Management Summary Report<br />
has provided a construction/equipment escrow account to ensure rate stability and the longterm<br />
viability <strong>of</strong> the landfill. One <strong>of</strong> the challenges associated with the processing <strong>of</strong> this<br />
filing was that if the rate at the Tucker landfill is too high, it will become more cost effective<br />
for the largest part <strong>of</strong> its customers to deliver solid waste to a landfill located in Frostburg,<br />
Maryland. Staff believes that its recommended rates will provide for the efficient operation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Tucker landfill while allowing it to be cost effective in relation to alternative disposal<br />
options.<br />
In 2007, Staff will process rate applications that will impact customers throughout Central<br />
<strong>West</strong> <strong>Virginia</strong>. Meadowfill Landfill, Inc. and S & S Grading, Inc., aka S & S Landfill, Inc., both<br />
located in Harrison County, have made filings to increase tipping fees. Also, Northern<br />
Panhandle solid waste customers will be impacted by filings to increase tipping fees at Wetzel<br />
County Landfill and Brooke County Sanitary Landfill.<br />
On November 15, 2001, the <strong>Commission</strong> and the <strong>West</strong> <strong>Virginia</strong> Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Environmental Protection entered into a Memorandum <strong>of</strong> Understanding (MOU) with regard<br />
to the implementation <strong>of</strong> financial assurance requirements <strong>of</strong> 33CSR1. The MOU provides<br />
that the staff <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Commission</strong> will perform financial analysis to determine levels <strong>of</strong> funding<br />
required for regulated solid waste landfills to close cells and to provide for 30 years <strong>of</strong> postclosure<br />
care <strong>of</strong> landfill sites in accordance with Federal EPA standards. The <strong>Commission</strong> will<br />
establish and supervise escrow accounts funded by landfills which will assure that funds are<br />
available to meet future environmental requirements as administered by DEP. Implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> this interdepartmental undertaking began in mid-<strong>2002</strong> and was halted in 2004, but has been<br />
reactivated and will continue into 2007 with the goal <strong>of</strong> establishing adequate funding for all<br />
regulated landfills. Prior to 2006, all closure and post closure escrow fund accounts were<br />
established through a three-party agreement between the solid waste facility, the <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong><br />
<strong>Commission</strong> and the bank performing the function <strong>of</strong> escrow agent. In 2006 a new escrow<br />
agreement format was established which added the Division <strong>of</strong> Environmental Protection as a<br />
party and designated the State Treasurer as the escrow agent.<br />
Challenges to Regulation:<br />
The <strong>Commission</strong> has opened a General Investigation <strong>of</strong> Solid Waste Motor Carriers (Case<br />
No. 06-0722-MC-GI) in the wake <strong>of</strong> the April 11, 2006, federal court decision James Allen<br />
Harper , et al. v. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> et al., Case No. 2:03-cv-00516, which concluded<br />
that W. Va. Code §24A-2-5 violates Mr. Harper’s rights under the commerce clause <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Constitution and that the PSC could not require solid waste collectors who cross state lines to<br />
obtain a certificate <strong>of</strong> convenience and necessity before operating in <strong>West</strong> <strong>Virginia</strong>. For a<br />
discussion <strong>of</strong> the nature and status <strong>of</strong> various challenges to the <strong>Commission</strong>’s jurisdiction and<br />
Page 47