CIMAC Congress - Schiff & Hafen
CIMAC Congress - Schiff & Hafen
CIMAC Congress - Schiff & Hafen
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>CIMAC</strong> CONGRESS | BERGEN 2010<br />
15:30 June 15th Room Scene GH<br />
(3–6) Environment, Fuel & Combustion –<br />
Diesel Engines – Emission Reduction<br />
Sailing towards IMO Tier III – Exhaust<br />
after treatment versus engine-internal<br />
technologies for medium speed diesel<br />
engines<br />
G. Tinschmann, D. Thum, S. Schlueter, P. Pelemis,<br />
G. Stiesch, MAN Diesel & Turbo SE, Germany<br />
Large engines capable of burning heavy fuel oil (HFO) offer<br />
unrivalled effi ciency in operation, long maintenance intervals<br />
and thus hold a dominant market share of over 95% as<br />
propulsion engines in merchant shipping. Taking into account<br />
of the tonnages transported ships are the most economical and<br />
lowest emissions means of transport. However, the proportion<br />
of shipping related emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) und<br />
oxides of sulphur (SOx) is increasing constantly, especially on<br />
shipping routes with a high traffi c concentration and in ports.<br />
Issued by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), with<br />
MARPOL 73/78 Annex VI the fi rst internationally valid piece of<br />
legislation for the limitation of gaseous harmful emissions from<br />
marine diesel engines came into force in 2005, retroactively to<br />
1st January 2000 and is by now titled IMO Tier I in relation to<br />
its NOx limits. Scheduled for 2011, IMO Tier II targets for a 15<br />
- 22% reduction in the NOx limits to be complemented in 2016<br />
by IMO Tier III which calls for the application of a reduction in<br />
NOx emissions of 80% compared with today’s standard in<br />
certain waters yet to be defi ned – so called Emission Control<br />
Areas or “ECA’s”. For the reduction of sulphur oxide (SOx)<br />
emissions from marine engines IMO has nominated SOx-<br />
Emissions Control Areas (SECAs). In these zones, only fuels<br />
with a maximum sulphur content of today 1.5% may be used or<br />
the ship operators are required to employ an equally effective<br />
exhaust aftertreatment. Since the sulphur content of the fuel has<br />
an enormous infl uence on the particulate emissions of an<br />
engine, with the introduction of Annex VI the maximum<br />
sulphur content of marine fuels will be further limited not just<br />
for the ECA’s but worldwide. To fulfi l the limits set by the IMO<br />
MAN Diesel is focussing on technologies which are best to meet<br />
the requirements. On the one hand engines have to fulfi l IMO<br />
Tier II limits on the free ocean and it is allowed to burn heavy<br />
fuel oils with up to 3.5% sulphur until 2020. On the other hand<br />
NOx emissions must be 80% below IMO Tier I inside the ECA’s<br />
and low sulphur fuel has to be used or equivalent techniques<br />
for reducing the SOx-Emissions have to be applied. This paper<br />
describes investigations carried out at MAN Diesel SE and deals<br />
with the following questions and tasks:<br />
• What is the preferred technology for IMO Tier III having the<br />
lowest capital and operational expenditures in mind?<br />
• Is exhaust gas aftertreatment with an SCR catalyst the<br />
preferred solution to reach the NOx-limits or are there<br />
alternatives like Miller-Cycle, exhaust gas recirculation and wet<br />
methods? Are these options technically feasible and<br />
competitive?<br />
• Is a fl exible engine necessary, switching from Tier II to Tier<br />
III operation when entering ECA’s?<br />
• What’s the benefi t of an exhaust gas scrubber and which are<br />
the major challenges if we use HFO also in ECA’s?<br />
• What is the preferred solution for a small genset engine and<br />
which is the favourite for large propulsion engines?<br />
After giving a short overview of technical solutions including<br />
test results, the paper summarizes the challenges and concludes<br />
with the evaluation of several Tier III technologies..<br />
58<br />
Ship & Offshore | 2010 | No. 3<br />
Exhaust emission control of Mitsubishi UE<br />
diesel engine<br />
A. Miyanagi, K. Watanabe, J. Yanagi, Mitsubishi<br />
Heavy Industries, Ltd., Japan<br />
This paper shows our approach and perspective to exhaust emission<br />
control of Mitsubishi UE low speed two-stroke diesel engine for<br />
marine propulsion. Regulations for the emission from marine diesel<br />
engines are tightened still further. IMO Tier II regulation requires<br />
nitrogen oxides to be reduced approx. 15% by 2011 and Tier III<br />
requires them to be reduced 80% by 2016. Sulfur oxides are required<br />
the phased reduction of sulfur content in fuel. Carbon dioxide is<br />
also the matter being discussed for the future regulation. UE engine<br />
adapts to IMO Tier II with engine parameter optimization such as<br />
Miller cycle, fuel injection rate, optimization of fuel spray and swirl<br />
fl ow in combustion chamber in order to prevent large increase of<br />
carbon oxide. For IMO Tier III regulation, aftertreatment of emission<br />
is under consideration. Combination of exhaust gas re-circulation<br />
and water injection could be possible to reduce nitrogen oxides.<br />
However, this combination possibly brings some carbon dioxide<br />
increase and reliability degradation caused by sulfuric acid. For<br />
sulfur oxides, reduction of sulfur content in fuel might be well<br />
received and suitable for after treatment and EGR system because of<br />
low sulfuric oxides. In future, demand for carbon dioxide reduction<br />
will probably be strengthened. Several measures are under<br />
investigation such as waste heat recovery system, hybrid turbocharger<br />
and so on. It is assumed that this approach would be signifi cant in<br />
conjunction with shipping mode optimization.<br />
Two-stroke engine emission reduction<br />
technology: state-of-the-art<br />
M. F. Pedersen, A. Andreasen, S. Mayer, MAN Diesel<br />
& Turbo SE , Denmark<br />
Future emission regulation requires drastic reductions of harmful<br />
regulated pollutants from large diesel engines. For marine diesel<br />
engines, especially the recently adopted amendments to MARPOL<br />
Annex VI, contains signifi cantly tightened regulations in terms of<br />
emission control for both existing and new engines. Engine-out<br />
emissions can be controlled either by primary or secondary methods.<br />
Primary methods focus on the process on emission formation and<br />
involve e.g. adjustment of the engine injection equipment, injection<br />
and exhaust valve timing, as well as technologies such e.g. Water-In-<br />
Fuel emulsion (WIF) and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR). Secondary<br />
methods focus on exhaust gas after-treatment and involve for<br />
instance NOx reduction using selective catalytic reduction (SCR)<br />
and scrubber technology for washing out sulfur species as well as<br />
particulate matter. This paper will focus on primary methods. The<br />
regulation, as well as an increasing demand from various owners,<br />
operators, ports and other concerned task holders, has led to MAN<br />
Diesel using part of its R&D resources in developing retrofi t measures<br />
for existing engines. The retrofi ts are aimed at reducing NOx, but<br />
will also be benefi cial for other emission and operation aspects.<br />
Recent results on this work will be presented in the paper. Water in<br />
fuel emulsion (WIF) is an existing wellproven technology for large<br />
two-stroke engines, especially for land based stationary diesel power<br />
plants. Recently WIF has been further investigated on the 4T50ME-X<br />
test engine in Copenhagen. Both the NOx reduction potential as<br />
well as the effect on other emissions is investigated. In this paper<br />
water contents up to 90 % vol. added water have been achieved and<br />
a NOx reduction approaching 60% has been obtained. While the<br />
emission of unburned hydrocarbons (HC) increase somewhat it is<br />
shown that WIF is very effective in reducing the emission of CO.<br />
Results from investigations on exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) will