05.02.2013 Views

CIMAC Congress - Schiff & Hafen

CIMAC Congress - Schiff & Hafen

CIMAC Congress - Schiff & Hafen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CIMAC</strong> CONGRESS | BERGEN 2010<br />

15:30 June 15th Room Scene GH<br />

(3–6) Environment, Fuel & Combustion –<br />

Diesel Engines – Emission Reduction<br />

Sailing towards IMO Tier III – Exhaust<br />

after treatment versus engine-internal<br />

technologies for medium speed diesel<br />

engines<br />

G. Tinschmann, D. Thum, S. Schlueter, P. Pelemis,<br />

G. Stiesch, MAN Diesel & Turbo SE, Germany<br />

Large engines capable of burning heavy fuel oil (HFO) offer<br />

unrivalled effi ciency in operation, long maintenance intervals<br />

and thus hold a dominant market share of over 95% as<br />

propulsion engines in merchant shipping. Taking into account<br />

of the tonnages transported ships are the most economical and<br />

lowest emissions means of transport. However, the proportion<br />

of shipping related emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) und<br />

oxides of sulphur (SOx) is increasing constantly, especially on<br />

shipping routes with a high traffi c concentration and in ports.<br />

Issued by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), with<br />

MARPOL 73/78 Annex VI the fi rst internationally valid piece of<br />

legislation for the limitation of gaseous harmful emissions from<br />

marine diesel engines came into force in 2005, retroactively to<br />

1st January 2000 and is by now titled IMO Tier I in relation to<br />

its NOx limits. Scheduled for 2011, IMO Tier II targets for a 15<br />

- 22% reduction in the NOx limits to be complemented in 2016<br />

by IMO Tier III which calls for the application of a reduction in<br />

NOx emissions of 80% compared with today’s standard in<br />

certain waters yet to be defi ned – so called Emission Control<br />

Areas or “ECA’s”. For the reduction of sulphur oxide (SOx)<br />

emissions from marine engines IMO has nominated SOx-<br />

Emissions Control Areas (SECAs). In these zones, only fuels<br />

with a maximum sulphur content of today 1.5% may be used or<br />

the ship operators are required to employ an equally effective<br />

exhaust aftertreatment. Since the sulphur content of the fuel has<br />

an enormous infl uence on the particulate emissions of an<br />

engine, with the introduction of Annex VI the maximum<br />

sulphur content of marine fuels will be further limited not just<br />

for the ECA’s but worldwide. To fulfi l the limits set by the IMO<br />

MAN Diesel is focussing on technologies which are best to meet<br />

the requirements. On the one hand engines have to fulfi l IMO<br />

Tier II limits on the free ocean and it is allowed to burn heavy<br />

fuel oils with up to 3.5% sulphur until 2020. On the other hand<br />

NOx emissions must be 80% below IMO Tier I inside the ECA’s<br />

and low sulphur fuel has to be used or equivalent techniques<br />

for reducing the SOx-Emissions have to be applied. This paper<br />

describes investigations carried out at MAN Diesel SE and deals<br />

with the following questions and tasks:<br />

• What is the preferred technology for IMO Tier III having the<br />

lowest capital and operational expenditures in mind?<br />

• Is exhaust gas aftertreatment with an SCR catalyst the<br />

preferred solution to reach the NOx-limits or are there<br />

alternatives like Miller-Cycle, exhaust gas recirculation and wet<br />

methods? Are these options technically feasible and<br />

competitive?<br />

• Is a fl exible engine necessary, switching from Tier II to Tier<br />

III operation when entering ECA’s?<br />

• What’s the benefi t of an exhaust gas scrubber and which are<br />

the major challenges if we use HFO also in ECA’s?<br />

• What is the preferred solution for a small genset engine and<br />

which is the favourite for large propulsion engines?<br />

After giving a short overview of technical solutions including<br />

test results, the paper summarizes the challenges and concludes<br />

with the evaluation of several Tier III technologies..<br />

58<br />

Ship & Offshore | 2010 | No. 3<br />

Exhaust emission control of Mitsubishi UE<br />

diesel engine<br />

A. Miyanagi, K. Watanabe, J. Yanagi, Mitsubishi<br />

Heavy Industries, Ltd., Japan<br />

This paper shows our approach and perspective to exhaust emission<br />

control of Mitsubishi UE low speed two-stroke diesel engine for<br />

marine propulsion. Regulations for the emission from marine diesel<br />

engines are tightened still further. IMO Tier II regulation requires<br />

nitrogen oxides to be reduced approx. 15% by 2011 and Tier III<br />

requires them to be reduced 80% by 2016. Sulfur oxides are required<br />

the phased reduction of sulfur content in fuel. Carbon dioxide is<br />

also the matter being discussed for the future regulation. UE engine<br />

adapts to IMO Tier II with engine parameter optimization such as<br />

Miller cycle, fuel injection rate, optimization of fuel spray and swirl<br />

fl ow in combustion chamber in order to prevent large increase of<br />

carbon oxide. For IMO Tier III regulation, aftertreatment of emission<br />

is under consideration. Combination of exhaust gas re-circulation<br />

and water injection could be possible to reduce nitrogen oxides.<br />

However, this combination possibly brings some carbon dioxide<br />

increase and reliability degradation caused by sulfuric acid. For<br />

sulfur oxides, reduction of sulfur content in fuel might be well<br />

received and suitable for after treatment and EGR system because of<br />

low sulfuric oxides. In future, demand for carbon dioxide reduction<br />

will probably be strengthened. Several measures are under<br />

investigation such as waste heat recovery system, hybrid turbocharger<br />

and so on. It is assumed that this approach would be signifi cant in<br />

conjunction with shipping mode optimization.<br />

Two-stroke engine emission reduction<br />

technology: state-of-the-art<br />

M. F. Pedersen, A. Andreasen, S. Mayer, MAN Diesel<br />

& Turbo SE , Denmark<br />

Future emission regulation requires drastic reductions of harmful<br />

regulated pollutants from large diesel engines. For marine diesel<br />

engines, especially the recently adopted amendments to MARPOL<br />

Annex VI, contains signifi cantly tightened regulations in terms of<br />

emission control for both existing and new engines. Engine-out<br />

emissions can be controlled either by primary or secondary methods.<br />

Primary methods focus on the process on emission formation and<br />

involve e.g. adjustment of the engine injection equipment, injection<br />

and exhaust valve timing, as well as technologies such e.g. Water-In-<br />

Fuel emulsion (WIF) and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR). Secondary<br />

methods focus on exhaust gas after-treatment and involve for<br />

instance NOx reduction using selective catalytic reduction (SCR)<br />

and scrubber technology for washing out sulfur species as well as<br />

particulate matter. This paper will focus on primary methods. The<br />

regulation, as well as an increasing demand from various owners,<br />

operators, ports and other concerned task holders, has led to MAN<br />

Diesel using part of its R&D resources in developing retrofi t measures<br />

for existing engines. The retrofi ts are aimed at reducing NOx, but<br />

will also be benefi cial for other emission and operation aspects.<br />

Recent results on this work will be presented in the paper. Water in<br />

fuel emulsion (WIF) is an existing wellproven technology for large<br />

two-stroke engines, especially for land based stationary diesel power<br />

plants. Recently WIF has been further investigated on the 4T50ME-X<br />

test engine in Copenhagen. Both the NOx reduction potential as<br />

well as the effect on other emissions is investigated. In this paper<br />

water contents up to 90 % vol. added water have been achieved and<br />

a NOx reduction approaching 60% has been obtained. While the<br />

emission of unburned hydrocarbons (HC) increase somewhat it is<br />

shown that WIF is very effective in reducing the emission of CO.<br />

Results from investigations on exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) will

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!