1517-creating-holistic-technology-enhanced-learning-experiences
1517-creating-holistic-technology-enhanced-learning-experiences
1517-creating-holistic-technology-enhanced-learning-experiences
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EDITORIAL<br />
research; and (4) transferring of innovative ICT practices with the teaching<br />
fraternity. The commitment and perseverance of those involved, strong leadership<br />
together with a high level of technical and pedagogical knowledge and skills are<br />
conditions that facilitate the implementation and sustainment of innovative<br />
practices. The authors stress that committed and capable individuals remain the<br />
single most important success factor for sustainable innovations.<br />
INSIGHTS – FROM THE COMMUNITY<br />
In Discussant Chapter 1, in response to the book chapters, Lloyds and Romeo<br />
highlight four key messages, the movement of ICT from periphery to the<br />
mainstream, ICT changing but not replacing school, change supported at all levels<br />
and changes in the role of the teacher. The authors call for a change to grasp the<br />
affordances of new <strong>technology</strong> in teacher education because the roles of teachers<br />
are changing and so too should the role of the teacher educator.<br />
In Discussant Chapter 2, in their response to the book chapters, Chai and Tsai<br />
propose that the TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge<br />
Framework) could be used to review the chapters presented in this book. They<br />
suggest that the successful integration of ICT for <strong>learning</strong> requires teachers to have<br />
three basic forms of knowledge – technical, pedagogical and content. In addition,<br />
teachers need to also consider the intersections of these forms of knowledge,<br />
namely technical pedagogical knowledge, technical content knowledge,<br />
pedagogical content knowledge as well as technical pedagogical and content<br />
knowledge.<br />
In Discussant Chapter 3, Rudd applauds the school’s effort in using practitioner<br />
research as a form of professional development. He reflects that professional<br />
development opportunities are very often ‘one off’, ‘one size fits all’ and ‘top<br />
down’ activities that may not have a durable impact. Although this approach is<br />
practical and maybe highly successful in many instances, it does not necessarily<br />
provide teachers and practitioners a sense of ‘ownership’; and with such a<br />
homogenised form of practice, creativity and innovation may not be well<br />
facilitated. He proposes the use of digital collaborative tools for sharing of<br />
practitioner research findings amongst practitioners and the involvement of<br />
students as co-designers of research projects. He highlights the value of<br />
practitioner research and also calls for the spreading of such a practice as a form of<br />
reaching out to a wider audience for the better sustainment of this innovation.<br />
In Discussant Chapter 4, the final chapter, Bernard shares the concept of<br />
accelerating educational transformation through ICT from a global perspective. In<br />
order for the whole-system renewal to be effective, Bernard lists four necessary<br />
features to be in place: (1) student-driven <strong>learning</strong> must be at the core; (2)<br />
changing teaching practice to embrace <strong>technology</strong>, rather than fearing it; (3) strong<br />
school leadership; and (4) system change with strong community partnership<br />
support. He describes Microsoft Innovative Teaching and Learning (ITL) Research,<br />
with the aim of innovative teaching practice using ICT for students’ attainment of<br />
21 st century skills. The Innovative Teaching and Learning practice includes: (1)<br />
xi