14.07.2013 Views

Télécharger - Revue Palabres

Télécharger - Revue Palabres

Télécharger - Revue Palabres

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

50<br />

<strong>Palabres</strong>, <strong>Revue</strong> d’Etudes Africaines, Vol. III, n°1, 2000.<br />

being of women [...] ’STIWA’ is about the inclusion of African women in the<br />

contemporary social and political transformation of Africa. I am sure there will be few<br />

African men who will oppose the concept of including women in the social<br />

transformation of Africa, which is really the issue. Women have to participate as copartners<br />

in social transformation 73 .<br />

As can be seen here, Ogundipe-Leslie’s central idea is that gender issues should play a<br />

central role in all social restructuring. She thus indicates, considerably more explicitly<br />

than Ogunyemi, that the gender relationships can be innovated only in the context of<br />

basic social transformations. She as well thus argues in a much more complex way<br />

than Walker and Hudson-Weems and most closely meets what Zoë Wicomb aims at.<br />

Ogundipe-Leslie’s stiwanism, like Ogunyemi’s womanism, represents something<br />

originally African: White as well as African-American women are - not explicitly, but<br />

still by definition - excluded from stiwanism. Moreover, stiwanism, too, is<br />

characterized by a demarcation from feminism. This, however, has less to do with a<br />

personal antipathy to feminism than with the fact that feminism is met with such<br />

vehement disapproval in Africa. By coining a new name Ogundipe-Leslie hopes «to<br />

bypass the combative discourses that ensue whenever one raises the issue of feminism<br />

in Africa». And she goes on:<br />

The creation of the new word is to deflect energies from constantly having to respond to<br />

charges of imitating Western feminism and, in this way, to avoid being distracted from<br />

the real issue of the conditions of women in Africa [...] This new term describes my<br />

agenda for women in Africa without having to answer charges of imitativeness or<br />

having to constantly define our agenda on the African continent in relation to other<br />

feminisms, in particular, white Euro-American feminisms which are unfortunately,<br />

under siege by everyone 74<br />

Ogundipe-Leslie does not make mention of whether men may be stiwanists. However,<br />

the whole idea of her concept suggests that she proceeds from the necessity of a cooperation<br />

of men and women. 75<br />

Generally speaking, the main concern of the alternative concepts to feminism is to<br />

found an autonomous anti-movement of black or, respectively, African women to<br />

feminism that contextualizes the criticism of gender relationships. Apart from this<br />

73 Ogundipe-Leslie 1994b: 229 - 230.<br />

74 Ibid: 229 - 230.<br />

75 Though Catherine Acholonu refers to her concept of Motherism as an « Afrocentric alternative to feminism »<br />

(cf.: Acholonu 1995) it is not discussed here since ultimately it neither has nor wants anything to do with<br />

feminist issues: The gender question plays neither an explicit nor an implicit role. For a detailed discussion of<br />

Acholonu's motherism, cf: Arndt, Susan, African Women’s Literature, Orality and Intertextuality. Igbo Oral<br />

Narratives as Nigerian Women Writers’ Models and Objects of Writing Back, Bayreuth, Bayreuth African<br />

Studies, 1998, 338 - 340. Werewere Liking’s term « misovire », which she used in the course of an interview<br />

with the journal Jeune Afrique, will be ignored here, too, as to date she did not theorize it in more detail. In the<br />

interview she said: « Je suis une misovire [...] C’est misogyne [...] au féminin. » (Andriamirado, Sennen, « La<br />

femme par qui le scandale arrive », in Jeune Afrique, 1172, June 22, 1983, 69.) Stating the reasons for this<br />

position, she stressed that she considers men the adversary of all beautiful and pleasant things, unreliable and<br />

unconvincing. Women, however, are reproached by her for enabling men to deal with them in a sexist way (cf.:<br />

ibid).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!