25.10.2014 Views

5.1 (pdf) - CEC

5.1 (pdf) - CEC

5.1 (pdf) - CEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

_l-__F:..:r,;;o.:.:.m:..:t;,:.;h.::.e..::;B..::;oa.::.r;..;;d~<br />

Conseil des arts de la Communauti urbaine de Montreal, l'Universiti<br />

Concordia (bureau du recteur, la Faculte des beaux-arts et Ie Departement<br />

de musique) et surtout les coinpositeur(e)s et interprctes qui ont fait en .<br />

sorte que ces Journees e1ectr~coustiques <strong>CEC</strong> soient unereussite sur<br />

tous les plans.<br />

Kevin Austin, Montreal .<br />

communauti urbain de Montreal, the <strong>CEC</strong>, Queen's University,<br />

Concordia University (Rector's Office, Faculty of Fine Arts, and<br />

Department ofMusic), and most ofall the composers and performers<br />

who made this the most broadly successful <strong>CEC</strong> Electroacoustic Days<br />

so far.<br />

Kevin Austin, Montreal<br />

it ·I'ecoufe de l'Ontario<br />

En tant que membre du conseil d'administration de la<strong>CEC</strong>, je me suis<br />

interessee aU'developperrient de I'activite elcctroacoustique de la region<br />

de Toronto etde l'ensemble de la province d'Ontario. Bien qu'il yait<br />

plusieurs electroacousticiens a.ctifs qui resident dans la region<br />

metropolitahte de Toronto, la communication a etc quasi-inexistente. pe<br />

plus, Ie reseau pour la presentation de nos oeuvres reste toujours a I'ctat<br />

embryonnaire, Nous avons donc 9rganise, en fevrier demie:r, UJie reunion<br />

a la M~sic Oallery de Toronto afm de discuter de la mise sur pied d'un<br />

studio d'enregi;trement, d'une seriede concerts, d'ateliers et de seances<br />

d'ecoute. Nousnous sommes d'abord re~cigncsau sujet de racccssibilitc.<br />

de studios d'enregistrement.<br />

Dans un autre temps, DavidMott de I'universite Yorknous a offert<br />

I'utilisation liventuelle des installations du departement de musique, pour<br />

fin de concert, Jim Montgomery du Music Gallery a discuter de la<br />

creation d'un studio d'enregistrement voue a larccherche, tandis que<br />

d'autres intervenants ont proposes qu'une entente soit prise avec certainS<br />

studios d'enregistrement commerciaux de Toronto dans Ie but de les _<br />

rendre plus accueillant envers les projets qui ne necessitent qu'un mixage<br />

final. Au terme de: la reunion, pIusieurs personnes ont signtS une lettre<br />

demandant au gouvemement NPD de I'Ontario d'augmenter l'octroi au<br />

Conseil deS Arts de I'Ontario.Lc 29 avril, Ie gouvemement de l'Ontario<br />

annonc;ait I)n octroi suppIemtlUtaire de $7.5 millionS ace meme<br />

organisme~<br />

. Les reunions suivantes se sont derouIces Ie 26 marset Ie 7 mai ala<br />

Music.Gallery. Cesreunions ont servi aI'Ccoute d'oeuvres completes ou<br />

. en co~rs. No.us avions a notre disposition un systeme de son de.himte<br />

gaffime. Nous enavons aussi profile pour discuter longuement, si bien que<br />

qu'a Ia suite d'une session marathon plusieurs auditeurs ont developpc<br />

une "fatigue d'Ccoute". John Oswald a remarquc qu'il entend souvent les<br />

memes commentaires soit qu'une oeuvre eSt trop longue ou qu'elle est<br />

jouec aun volume trop eleve ou trop faible. Ces commentaires sont<br />

gencra:Iement rcitcres lors des Journees <strong>CEC</strong>. Ces.questions pourrai¢nt.<br />

porter sur les formes de presentations de notre artct sur l'utilisation des<br />

moyens technologiques,<br />

Ontario musings<br />

As part ofmy responsibilities of being a board member of the <strong>CEC</strong>, I<br />

have undertaken the development of electroacoustic activity in the<br />

· Toronto area, which will help to build the<strong>CEC</strong> profile and presence in<br />

Ontario. Allhough there arc many active electroacoustic composers<br />

who live in the larger Toronto region, we have h·ad little<br />

communication, and there are very few local performance possibilities<br />

for our work, I sent out a mailing in February which ant:Jounced a<br />

meeting to be held at the Music Gallery [Toronto] to discuss such<br />

items as the developmentofstudio facilities, a concert series,<br />

educational workshops, and regular listening sessions. The resportse<br />

Was positive and during the first mceting, many suggestions for $tud~.;;:.<br />

· access were offered, .'fi!!Jl}}<br />

I received contact from David Mott of York University expressing<br />

his support and potential use of the concert facilities'in the music<br />

department. Jim Montgomery of the Music Gallery discussed the<br />

possible development of a research oriented studio at the Gallery;<br />

Others'suggested arrangements be·made with the many commercial<br />

studios in the city, particularlyfor the purpose of creating a final mix<br />

of a work. At the end of this frrst meeting, several people signed a<br />

letter which was mailed to several cabinet ministers of the Ontario<br />

NDP goverrunent requesting that they support the proposal to provide<br />

additional funds for the Ontario Arts Council. The good news is that<br />

an additional $ 7.5 million has been added to the base operating grant<br />

· of the OAC, as aImounced in the budgetspeech on April 29.<br />

The next two sessions, held on March 26 and May 7, were primarily<br />

for listening to compositions - both completed works and .<br />

works-in-progress. The MusiC Gallery was our host, and we had<br />

access to good quality playback equipment. Several works were·<br />

· played and good discussion was generated, so much so that after one<br />

marathon session, people developed "listening fatigue", One<br />

interestingpoint raised by John Oswald was that he often hears<br />

cOlrunents that a work is "too long",or "tooloud", or played "too<br />

soft". No doubts these points will be raised again at<br />

· »PERSPECTIVES->->, as they tend to haunt each festival held so<br />

far. Perhaps what is at stake is a fundamental qucstioning regarding<br />

how tIllS arlform is to be presented, and how to usc technology to<br />

enrich rather than to dominate.<br />

[!1 ontad! I Octobre/ October 1991 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!