Annotated checklist of the polychaete species of the ... - Senckenberg

More documents

Recommendations

Info

24 T. WEHE & D. FIEGE Dasybranchus caducus (Grube, 1846) Dasymallus caducus Grube, 1846: 166. Type locality/origin: “Küste des Mittelmeers” (Mediterranean Sea). Dasybranchus caducus. — GRAVIER: 1905 b: 91. Dasybranchus caducus. — GRAVIER 1906 d: 180. Dasybranchus caducus. — FAUVEL 1919 b: 437. Dasybranchus caducus. — POTTS 1928: 693. Dasybranchus caducus. — WESENBERG-LUND 1949: 338. Dasybranchus caducus. — FAUVEL 1958: 8. ° Dasybranchus caducus. — HARTMAN 1959: 441. Dasybranchus caducus. — DAY 1965: 24. Dasybranchus caducus. — FISHELSON & RULLIER 1969: 88. Dasybranchus caducus. — FISHELSON 1971: 119. Dasybranchus caducus. — KISELEVA 1971: 65. Dasybranchus caducus. — HARTMAN 1974 b: 628. Dasybranchus caducus. — BEN-ELIAHU 1976 b: 138. Dasybranchus cf. caducus. — AMOUREUX et al. 1980: 388. Dasybranchus caducus. — BEN-ELIAHU & SAFRIEL 1982: 389. Regional distribution: Suez Canal, Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, Arabian Gulf. Dasybranchus carneus Ehrenberg in Grube, 1869 Dasybranchus carneus Ehrenberg in Grube, 1869: 505. Type locality/origin: “Tor” (Egypt, Red Sea). Dasybranchus carneus. — FAUVEL 1933 a: 6. Dasybranchus carneus. — FAUVEL 1933 b: 140. ° Dasybranchus carneus. — HARTMAN 1959: 441. Dasybranchus carneus. — HARTMAN 1974 b: 628. Regional distribution: Red Sea. [?] Decamastus gracilis Hartman, 1963 Decamastus gracilis Hartman, 1963: 61. Type locality/origin: “Redondo, south wall, Mugu, Southern California” (NE Pacific). ? Decamastus cf. gracilis. — AMOUREUX et al. 1980: 388. ° Decamastus gracilis. — BLAKE et al. 2000: 63. Regional distribution: Red Sea. Remarks: Decamastus gracilis was only tentatively reported by AMOUREUX et al. (1980). Therefore the occurrence of the species in the Red Sea needs to be confirmed. Heteromastides bifidus Augener, 1914 Heteromastides bifidus Augener, 1914: 64. Type locality/origin: “Fremantle, Hafen” (W Australia, Indian Ocean). ° Heteromastides bifidus. — HARTMAN 1959: 442. Heteromastides bifidus. — FISHELSON & RULLIER 1969: 87. Regional distribution: Red Sea. Heteromastus filiformis (Claparède, 1864) Capitella filiformis Claparède, 1864: 49. Type locality/origin: Port-Vendres (France, Mediterranean Sea). Heteromastus filiformis. — WESENBERG-LUND 1949: 339. ° Heteromastus filiformis. — HUTCHINGS & RAINER 1981: 374. Regional distribution: Red Sea. Heteromastus similis Southern, 1921 Heteromastus similis Southern, 1921: 640. Type locality/origin: “Chilka Lake, between Nalbano and Berhampur, near the inner end of the outer channel” (India, Indian Ocean). ° Heteromastus similis. — HARTMAN 1959: 442. Heteromastus similis. — MOHAMMAD 1971: 297. Regional distribution: Arabian Gulf.
Annotated checklist of polychaetes of the Arabian Seas 25 Leiocapitellides analis Hartmann-Schröder, 1960 Leiocapitellides analis Hartmann-Schröder, 1960: 119. Type locality/origin: “Ghardaqa” (Egypt, Red Sea). ° Leiocapitellides analis. — HARTMAN 1965 a: 65. Leiocapitellides analis. — HARTMAN 1974 b: 628. Regional distribution: Red Sea. Remarks: Endemic species. [?] Leiochrides africanus Augener, 1918 Leiochrides africanus Augener, 1918: 472. Type locality/origin: “Elfenbeinküste, Wappu […] Dahomey, Whydah […] Französ.-Kongo, Setté Cama […] Angola, Ambrizette” (Coast of West Africa, NE and SE Atlantic). ° Leiochrides africanus. — HARTMAN 1959: 443. ? Leiochrides africanus. — AMOUREUX et al. 1978: 131. Leiochrides africanus. — AMOUREUX et al. 1980: 388. Leiochrides africanus. — AMOUREUX 1983 c: 369. Regional distribution: Red Sea. Remarks: AMOUREUX et al. (1978) provided a short description of Leiochrides africanus, the other records were only listed by AMOUREUX et al. (1980) and AMOUREUX (1983 c). Since the record by AMOUREUX et al. (1978) was only tentatively identified, all records need to be confirmed. Therefore the occurrence of this species in the Red Sea is regarded as questionable. Leiochrides australis Augener, 1914 Leiochrides australis Augener, 1914: 60. Type locality/origin: “Sharks Bay […] Rottnest, Ostküste […] Oyster Harbour bei Albany” (W Australia, Indian Ocean). ° Leiochrides australis. — HARTMAN 1959: 443. Leiochrides australis. — KISELEVA 1971: 65. Regional distribution: Red Sea. Mediomastus caudatus Hartman, 1974 Mediomastus caudatus Hartman, 1974 a: 237. Type locality/origin: Cochin Harbour, Kerala State (India, Arabian Sea). Regional distribution: Arabian Sea. Remarks: The species is not endemic to the Arabian Sea, as it has also been reported from the Bay of Bengal by HARTMAN (1974 a). Neopseudocapitella brasiliensis Rullier & Amoureux, 1979 Neopseudocapitella brasiliensis Rullier & Amoureux, 1979: 185. Type locality/origin: “Brésil” (Brasil, SW Atlantic). Neopseudocapitella brasiliensis. — AMOUREUX 1983 a: 738. Neopseudocapitella brasiliensis. — AMOUREUX 1983 b: 254. Regional distribution: Red Sea. Notomastus aberans Day, 1957 Notomastus aberans Day, 1957: 105. Type locality/origin: “Kosy Bay, Inhaca Island, Morrumbene Estuary” (South Africa, Indian Ocean). ° Notomastus aberans. — HARTMAN 1959: 444. Notomastus aberans. — KISELEVA 1971: 65. Regional distribution: Red Sea. Notomastus latericeus Sars, 1851 Notomastus latericeus Sars, 1851: 199. Type locality/origin: Norway (NE Atlantic). Notomastus latericeus. — FAUVEL 1932: 194. Notomastus latericeus. — MONRO 1937: 305.
Page 1 and 2: FAUNA OF ARABIA 19: 7-238 Date of p
Page 3 and 4: Area covered Annotated checklist of
Page 5 and 6: Annotated checklist of polychaetes
Page 11 and 12: Family Ampharetidae Malmgren, 1866
Page 17: Annotated checklist of polychaetes
Page 51 and 52: Hesione intertexta. — FAUVEL 1953
Page 69 and 70:
Annotated checklist of polychaetes
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
° Nereis longilingulis. — HARTMA
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Rhamphobrachium chuni. — KISELEVA
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Family Polynoidae Malmgren, 1867 An
Page 103 and 104:
Harmothoe imbricata. — AMOUREUX e
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Polynoe impatiens. — SAVIGNY 1826
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Family Sabellidae Malmgren, 1867 An
Page 113 and 114:
Demonax leucaspis. — MONRO 1937:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Family Sternaspidae Carus, 1863 Ann
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
° Proceraea aurantiaca. — GIDHOL
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Family Tomopteridae Johnston, 1865
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Taxa Annotated checklist of polycha
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
ispiralis, Protula ................
Page 221 and 222:
cryptica, Syllis truncata = Typosyl
Page 223 and 224:
geayi, Grubeulepis ................
Page 225 and 226:
kinbergi, Eupanthalis .............
Page 227 and 228:
multicornis, Serpula (Pomatoceros)
Page 229 and 230:
pterochaeta, Terebella ............
Page 231 and 232:
tesselata, Glycera = Glycera brevic
show all

Annotated checklist of the polychaete species of the ... - Senckenberg

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?