Report annuale 2007 Regione Emilia - RIPO - Cineca

16.8 Analisi della sopravvivenza delle protesi bi-tricompartimentale per modellocommerciale più utilizzate in Emilia-RomagnaTIPO DI PROTESIAnnoinizioN.% dipazienticon etàfino a70 anniN.fallimenti%sopravv.a 6 anniI.C. al95%NEXGEN – Zimmer 2000 6193 43.7 84 97.9 97.4-98.4PROFIX – Smith & Nephew 2000 3748 45.8 57 97.6 97.0-98.3P.F.C – DePuy 2000 1928 44.9 45 96.8 95.8-97.9SCORPIO – Stryker Howmedica 2002 1490 41.9 18 - -GENESIS II – Smith & Nephew 2000 925 45.1 6 98.5 97.3-99.7INTERAX – Stryker Howmedica 2000 732 34.6 31 94.6 92.7-96.6GEMINI MK II – Link 2002 650 34.5 3 - -LCS – DePuy 2000 637 42.9 11 97.6 96.0-99.1T.A.C.K. – Link 2000 631 39.6 32 94.4 92.4-96.3OPTETRACK – Exactech 2000 592 36.7 8 97.3 95.4-99.3ADVANCE – Wright 2001 547 33.3 13 96.2 93.9-98.5ROTAGLIDE – Corin Medical 2000 498 36.5 22 94.6 92.2-96.9AGC – Kirschner Biomet Merck 2001 493 36.9 6 98.2 96.6-99.8GENIUS TRICCC – DedienneSanté2000 448 25.9 16 94.6 91.7-97.5TC-PLUS - SOLUTION - PS –Endoplus2003 447 39.1 5 - -SCORE – Amplitude 2004 428 31.3 1 - -MULTIGEN – Lima 2001 360 36.7 7 - -913 – Wright Cremascoli 2000 357 44.8 4 98.7 97.5-100VANGUARD - PS - Biomet MerckFrance2005 341 55.7 2 - -PERFORMANCE – KirschnerBiomet Merck2000 277 48.7 8 96.8 94.5-99.0HLS – EVOLUTION – Tornier 2000 269 31.2 2 99.2 98.0-100G. K. S. – Permedica 2001 259 34.7 4 97.9 95.9-100NUOVA DURACON II – StrykerHowmedica2000 258 32.6 6 97.2 95.0-99.4ENDO-MODEL – Link 2000 211 32.6 3 97.0 92.9-100Altro (con meno di 100 casi) 2000 1388 44.6 30 95.7 93.9-97.5TUTTI I MODELLI 2000 24107 41.9 424 97.1 96.7-97.4100