05.09.2013 Views

PILL TESTING - Bonger Instituut

PILL TESTING - Bonger Instituut

PILL TESTING - Bonger Instituut

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Security pills<br />

Pills<br />

In relative terms, ‘security pills’ (those confiscated in nightlife venues) were rather<br />

more numerous than in other modalities, and in part they also appeared to reflect a<br />

different market segment. About one in ten security pills contained no MDMA at all,<br />

and the average MDMA content was somewhat lower too. The impression arises that<br />

pills ‘from the nightlife scene’ are less strong.<br />

Ecstasy users<br />

No data is available about the ecstasy users from whom pills were confiscated.<br />

Viability<br />

Some delay in testing was incurred due to the required police procedures surrounding<br />

the confiscated pills. However, partly on the basis of the experiences in this study<br />

and the solutions we reached, we believe it would be no problem to expand DIMS to<br />

include this testing variant elsewhere in the Netherlands. The testing of security pills<br />

did not entail higher costs, but expansion nationwide can be expected to substantially<br />

increase laboratory costs, initially at least, because of the greater numbers of pills<br />

supplied for testing. In all probability, costs will decline after that.<br />

Emergencies<br />

One limitation of this modality is that nothing is known about the people from whom<br />

security pills are confiscated. It would therefore be essential to at least keep accurate<br />

records of which pills were confiscated in which venue, if rapid, effective warning<br />

campaigns are to be launched that can target specific venues or nightlife areas.<br />

Benefits and drawbacks<br />

The table below schematically summarises the pros and cons of the three evaluated<br />

testing modalities in comparison with the currently existing method of testing ecstasy<br />

in an office on weekdays. Office-plus testing was found to have no real advantages<br />

above the existing method, and the main drawback is the somewhat higher cost.<br />

Both these modalities attract relatively small numbers of ecstasy users. The benefits<br />

of testing pills in buses parked in nightlife areas lie mainly in the ability to reach a<br />

more varied group of users. Compared to the existing approach, this variant probably<br />

also makes more pills available for monitoring – including more previously unknown<br />

types. It also offers added potential for conducting warning campaigns. Moreover, the<br />

bus not only reaches testers, but also other ecstasy users who did not come to have<br />

their ecstasy tested, and even nightlifers who do not take ecstasy. The main draw-<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!