Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Security pills<br />
Pills<br />
In relative terms, ‘security pills’ (those confiscated in nightlife venues) were rather<br />
more numerous than in other modalities, and in part they also appeared to reflect a<br />
different market segment. About one in ten security pills contained no MDMA at all,<br />
and the average MDMA content was somewhat lower too. The impression arises that<br />
pills ‘from the nightlife scene’ are less strong.<br />
Ecstasy users<br />
No data is available about the ecstasy users from whom pills were confiscated.<br />
Viability<br />
Some delay in testing was incurred due to the required police procedures surrounding<br />
the confiscated pills. However, partly on the basis of the experiences in this study<br />
and the solutions we reached, we believe it would be no problem to expand DIMS to<br />
include this testing variant elsewhere in the Netherlands. The testing of security pills<br />
did not entail higher costs, but expansion nationwide can be expected to substantially<br />
increase laboratory costs, initially at least, because of the greater numbers of pills<br />
supplied for testing. In all probability, costs will decline after that.<br />
Emergencies<br />
One limitation of this modality is that nothing is known about the people from whom<br />
security pills are confiscated. It would therefore be essential to at least keep accurate<br />
records of which pills were confiscated in which venue, if rapid, effective warning<br />
campaigns are to be launched that can target specific venues or nightlife areas.<br />
Benefits and drawbacks<br />
The table below schematically summarises the pros and cons of the three evaluated<br />
testing modalities in comparison with the currently existing method of testing ecstasy<br />
in an office on weekdays. Office-plus testing was found to have no real advantages<br />
above the existing method, and the main drawback is the somewhat higher cost.<br />
Both these modalities attract relatively small numbers of ecstasy users. The benefits<br />
of testing pills in buses parked in nightlife areas lie mainly in the ability to reach a<br />
more varied group of users. Compared to the existing approach, this variant probably<br />
also makes more pills available for monitoring – including more previously unknown<br />
types. It also offers added potential for conducting warning campaigns. Moreover, the<br />
bus not only reaches testers, but also other ecstasy users who did not come to have<br />
their ecstasy tested, and even nightlifers who do not take ecstasy. The main draw-<br />
90