03.01.2018 Aufrufe

atw 2018-1

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 63 (<strong>2018</strong>) | Issue 1 ı January<br />

OPERATION AND NEW BUILD 32<br />

| | Fig. 2.<br />

Comparison of the total annual effective dose obtained for several radionuclides with the model in RP101 [2] and with SUDOQU. Values labelled as SUDOQU*<br />

are obtained by applying the same removable fraction and wipe-off efficiency as those used in RP101.<br />

between these opposite effects. For<br />

Co-60 and Na-22, the smaller value<br />

of the external-radiation dose in<br />

SUDOQU (with respect to that in<br />

RP101) is not fully compensated by<br />

the larger values of the other dose<br />

contributions, leading to a slightly<br />

smaller total dose in SUDOQU. For<br />

the other considered nuclides ( Cs-137,<br />

Sr-90 and Pu-241), the opposite<br />

occurs, leading to more conservative<br />

results in SUDOQU.<br />

An additional comparison was<br />

made by implementing in SUDOQU<br />

the same assumptions as in RP101<br />

concerning the removable fraction<br />

and the transfer efficiency. These<br />

results are shown in Figure 2 as well,<br />

indicated by the label SUDOQU*.<br />

Due to these assumptions, the<br />

external-gamma-radiation exposure<br />

in SUDOQU* now increases to values<br />

larger than those in RP101, while the<br />

other dose contributions decrease,<br />

although still being larger than the<br />

values obtained in RP101. As a result,<br />

the annual dose values obtained with<br />

SUDOQU* are more conservative for<br />

all considered nuclides, but in good<br />

agreement with the RP101-results.<br />

4 Conclusions<br />

The SUDOQU model [1] enables dose<br />

evaluations for exposure to a surfacecontaminated<br />

object. It is characterised<br />

by the innovative and distinctive<br />

assumption of time-dependent<br />

surface- and indoor air-contamination<br />

levels governed by mass-balance<br />

equations based on the following<br />

mechanisms: radioactive decay,<br />

resuspension, wipe-off, deposition<br />

and ventilation. These features make<br />

the SUDOQU methodology a suitable<br />

candidate for performing clearance<br />

calculations based on reuse scenarios,<br />

where the individual is likely to be<br />

exposed to the same object throughout<br />

the year, and for which the<br />

assumption of constant contamination<br />

levels would be unrealistically<br />

conservative. In this work, a surfacecontaminated<br />

bookcase released from<br />

the controlled area of a nuclear facility<br />

is studied, with the aim of assessing<br />

the applicability of SUDOQU for<br />

the development of surface-clearance<br />

criteria for nuclear facilities. Deterministic<br />

calculations of the annual<br />

effective dose were thus conducted for<br />

several nuclides in different scenarios<br />

of use. First, the results in this paper<br />

reveal a strong nuclide dependency:<br />

even within the same category of<br />

emitters there can be pronounced<br />

differences in absolute dose values,<br />

depending on the radiological characteristics<br />

of the nuclides and their metabolic<br />

behaviour and radiobiological<br />

impact on the human body. Moreover,<br />

the consideration of a mass balance<br />

describing the time evolution of the<br />

contamination levels causes the total<br />

annual dose to be the result of<br />

a delicate interplay of the involved<br />

elements. In this way, a variation of a<br />

certain input parameter may lead to<br />

opposite effects on the various dose<br />

contributions, and thus to a total dose<br />

that either decreases, increases or<br />

remains constant. The net outcome<br />

again depends on the characteristics<br />

of the nuclide and on the specifics of<br />

the exposure scenario. The results<br />

obtained with SUDOQU were benchmarked<br />

against the results reported in<br />

RP101 [2] for the reuse scenario of a<br />

tool cabinet, and the two models<br />

proved to be in good agreement.<br />

The results presented in this paper<br />

not only demonstrate the suitability of<br />

SUDOQU for dose assessments related<br />

to clearance of objects from nuclear<br />

facilities, but they are also a good<br />

starting point to better understand<br />

the intricate interplay among the<br />

involved mechanisms. Their interaction<br />

also disclosed the importance and<br />

difficulty of a detailed sensitivity<br />

analysis. Future work will focus on the<br />

development of surface clearance<br />

levels based on probabilistic and<br />

realistically conservative dose assessments.<br />

References<br />

[1] T. van Dillen, SUDOQU: a new dose<br />

model to derive criteria for surface<br />

contamination of non-food (consumer)<br />

goods, containers and conveyances,<br />

Radiation Protection Dosimetry,<br />

164(1-2) (2015), pp. 160-164.<br />

[2] Radiation Protection 101: Basis for the<br />

definition of surface contamination<br />

clearance levels for the recycling or<br />

reuse of metals arising from<br />

dismantling of nuclear installations,<br />

European Commission, 1998.<br />

[3] ICRP, Age-dependent Doses to the<br />

Members of the Public from Intake of<br />

Radionuclides - Part 5 Compilation of<br />

Ingestion and Inhalation Coefficients,<br />

ICRP Publication 72. Ann. ICRP 26 (1),<br />

1995.<br />

Authors<br />

F. Russo<br />

C. Mommaert<br />

Bel V<br />

Rue Walcourt, 148<br />

1070 Brussels,<br />

Belgium<br />

T. van Dillen<br />

National Institute for Public Health<br />

and the Environment (RIVM)<br />

P.O. Box 1<br />

3720 BA Bilthoven,<br />

The Netherlands<br />

Operation and New Build<br />

Clearance of Surface-contaminated Objects from the Controlled Area of a Nuclear Facility: Application of the SUDOQU Methodology ı F. Russo, C. Mommaert and T. van Dillen

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!