20.02.2013 Views

Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...

Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...

Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Native Plant Synoptic Garden<br />

12<br />

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

(when not compacted); this results in lower water holding <strong>and</strong> nutrient storage capacity due to the<br />

water being able to percolate through s<strong>and</strong>y soils at a higher rate (Craul, 1999; Harris et la.,<br />

2004). This is not to say that increased water percolation <strong>and</strong> lower nutrient holding capacity is<br />

inherently bad. In fact, many of Western Washington’s native plants are well adapted to these<br />

specific soil conditions. Furthermore, existing plants on site appear to be healthy <strong>and</strong> not<br />

suffering from nutrient deficiencies or water stress that could result in either soil texture; even<br />

when factors such as topography <strong>and</strong> precipitation are included.<br />

Bulk Density<br />

The bulk densities of soil samples collected from the Graham Visitors Center sites were<br />

found to be at the lower end of the normal bulk density scale. Three bulk density samples were<br />

taken; the results can be seen in figure five. A normal bulk density is roughly between 1.0 g/cm 3<br />

<strong>and</strong> 1.6 g/cm 3 (Harris et la., 2004). In cases where soils are fine textured <strong>and</strong> subject to<br />

compaction, bulk densities of up to 2.6 g/cm have been recorded (Craul, 1999). In general,<br />

desirable bulk density for optimal plant growth is between 1.1 <strong>and</strong> 1.4 g/cm 3 (Craul, 1999; Harris<br />

et la., 2004). Even with our finer-textured soil samples bulk density measurements indicate that<br />

soils on site have good structure with adequate pore space. Greater pore space is better for root<br />

growth, water <strong>and</strong> air movement, as well as contribute to good nutrient accessibility (Craul, 1999;<br />

Harris et la., 2004; Marschner, 1995). Even Sample B, which was taken in the middle of the trail<br />

on the forested ridge, still had a low bulk density which could be a positive sign as far as these<br />

soils’ resistance to compaction; although that was only under foot traffic, not heavy machinery<br />

which would surely compact these soils.<br />

With excellent bulk densities already being recorded on site, it will be imperative that<br />

during installation of the Native Plant Synoptic Garden, measures are put in place to maintain this<br />

excellent characteristic needed for optimal plant growth.<br />

Water Permeability <strong>and</strong> Holding Capacity<br />

“In order to manage soils for optimal plant growth it is helpful to have a basic<br />

measurement of water holding capacity” (Brady et la., 2004). This can be seen in Figure five by<br />

the percent gravimetric water content. Gravimetric water content measures the percent of water<br />

in a given volume of soil. On our site, the two silty clay loams had a higher water content then<br />

the s<strong>and</strong>y clay loam; part of this is due to soil texture, but some of it is due to topography <strong>and</strong><br />

time elapsed since last rainfall. Although the differences between the soil textures’ water content

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!