20.02.2013 Views

Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...

Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...

Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Native Plant Synoptic Garden<br />

16<br />

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

nitrification <strong>and</strong> requires varying time periods for soil organisms to accomplish the<br />

transformation (Harris, 2004). As such, the slow process of ammonium transformation to nitrate<br />

means that it will be available over an extended period of time. Nitrate <strong>and</strong> ammonium are<br />

common in fertilizers, so their levels can easily be altered when soil analysis or plant symptoms<br />

deem it appropriate (Harris, 2004). “Many factors determine which of these two sources of<br />

nitrogen is ideal for overall plant success, but generally, similar levels of both nitrate <strong>and</strong><br />

ammonium prove to be the best catalyst for plant growth <strong>and</strong> health” (Marschner, 1995).<br />

“A soil with base saturations of 70% calcium, 12% magnesium, <strong>and</strong> 4% potassium is<br />

considered balanced for most plants” (Umass, 2004). The soil analysis determined the base<br />

saturations of the soil sample to be 44.7% calcium, 21.9% magnesium, <strong>and</strong> 1.4% potassium. The<br />

calcium <strong>and</strong> potassium base saturations are both low by the lab’s st<strong>and</strong>ards, yet plant health of<br />

existing plants on site suggest that these measurements should not be a concern. Magnesium base<br />

saturation level was almost twice as high as in balanced conditions, but is not a major issue due to<br />

how readily plants require magnesium (Harris, 2004; Maschner, 1995). Also, magnesium is<br />

immobile in soil pH’s at about 6.5 (so leaching should not be a problem), <strong>and</strong> tends to be<br />

generally deficient in Puget Sound soils (Chalker-Scott, 2004); so good magnesium availability<br />

on this site’s soils is favorable.<br />

The amount of extractable lead from the site soil samples was 2 ppm. The estimated total<br />

lead in the soil was found to be 46 ppm, which is in the low range of soil lead content (UMass.,<br />

2004). This level is low <strong>and</strong> indicates that soils on site have not been contaminated by lead<br />

containing sources. This is good because high lead levels can be a hazard to human health. Since<br />

the site is to be used intensively by the public , typical low lead levels are excellent news; no<br />

remedial action will be necessary for lead containment during construction or future use because<br />

of these low levels.<br />

Micronutrients<br />

The soil <strong>and</strong> plant tissue lab also analyzed the soil sample for micronutrients; Figure<br />

seven shows the nutrients in parts per million (ppm), <strong>and</strong> the typical soil range for each<br />

micronutrient. The data was derived directly from the soil analysis report which is located in<br />

Appendix A.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!