Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...
Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...
Full page photo print - WSU Puyallup Research and Extension ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Native Plant Synoptic Garden<br />
16<br />
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
nitrification <strong>and</strong> requires varying time periods for soil organisms to accomplish the<br />
transformation (Harris, 2004). As such, the slow process of ammonium transformation to nitrate<br />
means that it will be available over an extended period of time. Nitrate <strong>and</strong> ammonium are<br />
common in fertilizers, so their levels can easily be altered when soil analysis or plant symptoms<br />
deem it appropriate (Harris, 2004). “Many factors determine which of these two sources of<br />
nitrogen is ideal for overall plant success, but generally, similar levels of both nitrate <strong>and</strong><br />
ammonium prove to be the best catalyst for plant growth <strong>and</strong> health” (Marschner, 1995).<br />
“A soil with base saturations of 70% calcium, 12% magnesium, <strong>and</strong> 4% potassium is<br />
considered balanced for most plants” (Umass, 2004). The soil analysis determined the base<br />
saturations of the soil sample to be 44.7% calcium, 21.9% magnesium, <strong>and</strong> 1.4% potassium. The<br />
calcium <strong>and</strong> potassium base saturations are both low by the lab’s st<strong>and</strong>ards, yet plant health of<br />
existing plants on site suggest that these measurements should not be a concern. Magnesium base<br />
saturation level was almost twice as high as in balanced conditions, but is not a major issue due to<br />
how readily plants require magnesium (Harris, 2004; Maschner, 1995). Also, magnesium is<br />
immobile in soil pH’s at about 6.5 (so leaching should not be a problem), <strong>and</strong> tends to be<br />
generally deficient in Puget Sound soils (Chalker-Scott, 2004); so good magnesium availability<br />
on this site’s soils is favorable.<br />
The amount of extractable lead from the site soil samples was 2 ppm. The estimated total<br />
lead in the soil was found to be 46 ppm, which is in the low range of soil lead content (UMass.,<br />
2004). This level is low <strong>and</strong> indicates that soils on site have not been contaminated by lead<br />
containing sources. This is good because high lead levels can be a hazard to human health. Since<br />
the site is to be used intensively by the public , typical low lead levels are excellent news; no<br />
remedial action will be necessary for lead containment during construction or future use because<br />
of these low levels.<br />
Micronutrients<br />
The soil <strong>and</strong> plant tissue lab also analyzed the soil sample for micronutrients; Figure<br />
seven shows the nutrients in parts per million (ppm), <strong>and</strong> the typical soil range for each<br />
micronutrient. The data was derived directly from the soil analysis report which is located in<br />
Appendix A.