20.02.2013 Views

PROBLEMS OF GEOCOSMOS

PROBLEMS OF GEOCOSMOS

PROBLEMS OF GEOCOSMOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference "Problems of Geocosmos" (St. Petersburg, Russia, 26-30 May 2008)<br />

First model of resonant particle injection into the inner magnetosphere by SC pulse was described in details<br />

theoretically, was registered experimentally during the magnetic storm of March 24, 1991 and accepted for<br />

the explanation of the poststorm increase of the proton population in radiation belt in other cases.<br />

There are three aspects of the SC injection model, which restrict its acceptance as a source of the solar proton<br />

capture. First one relates to the restriction of the energy of trapped protons which cannot be lower than ~ 15<br />

MeV as was discussed earlier. Second restriction comes from the demand of exceptional large magnitude of<br />

the SC pulse for the effective injection. And the last factor follows from the fact that even if SC injection was<br />

effective, there is strong probability that this new belt will be swept out when the boundary of quasitrapping<br />

region will move closer to the Earth during the main phase of the magnetic storm.<br />

The second mechanism of direct solar proton trapping during the recovery phase found confirmation by<br />

detailed analysis of the particle dynamics during several magnetic storms. New proton belt was found<br />

outward from the last position of the SCR penetration boundary, i.e. on the magnetic field lines which<br />

previously were at the quasitrapping region and then became dipollike, keeping protons at the closed drift<br />

shells.<br />

This mechanism has also restriction on proton energy, but different from the SC injection mechanism. Here<br />

exists upper limit of the trapped protons somewhere between 10 and 20 MeV. For high energy particles<br />

magnetosphere recovery is too slow and third adiabatic invariant conserves.<br />

This restriction on energy also is confirmed by the observations.<br />

Therefore we can conclude that from the proposed two mechanisms of the SCR capture to the radiation belt<br />

only the second one, mechanism of the direct trapping at the magnetic storm recovery phase effectively<br />

supported by the direct measurements.<br />

References<br />

Blake, J.B., Kolasinski W.A., Fillius R.W, and Mullen E.G. (1992) Injection of electrons and protons with<br />

energies of tens of MeV into L > 4 on 24 March 1991, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 821.<br />

Kress, B.T., M. K. Hudson, M. D. Looper, J. Albert, J. G. Lyon, C. C. Goodrich, (2007) Global MHD Test-<br />

Particle Simulations of >10 MeV Radiation Belt Electrons During Storm Sudden Commencement, J.<br />

Geophys. Res., 112, A09215, doi:10.1029/2006JA012218.<br />

Kuznetsov S.N., K.Kudela, S.P. Ryumin, Y.V. Gotselyuk, (2002) CORONAS-F satellite - tasks for study of<br />

particle acceleration, Adv. Sp. Res. 30, 223<br />

Lazutin L.L., Kuznetsov S.N., Podorolsky A.N. (2006) Solar proton belts in the inner magnetosphere during<br />

magnetic storms., In: Proceedings of the 2d International Symposium Solar Extreme Events: Fundamental<br />

Science and Applied Aspects, 26-30 September 2005, Nor-Amberd, Armenia, ed. by A. Chilingarian and G.<br />

Karapetyan, CRD, Alikhanyan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia, 67<br />

Lazutin L. L., Kuznetsov S. N., and Podorolsky A.N. (2007) Creation and distruction of the solar proton<br />

belts during magnetic storms, Geomag. and aeronomy, 47(2), 187-197<br />

Lazutin L., E. Muravjeva, N. Hasebe, K. Sukurai and M. Hareyama, (2008) Comparative analysis of the<br />

energetic electron and solar proton dynamics during strong magnetic storms, Physics of Auroral<br />

Phenomena”, Proc. XXXI Annual Seminar, Apatity<br />

Li, X., Roth I., Temerin M., Wygant J.R., Hudson M.K., and Blake J.B. (1993) Simulations of the prompt<br />

energization and transport of radiation belt particles during the March 24, 1991 SSC, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20,<br />

2423.<br />

Looper, M. D., J. B. Blake, and R. A. Mewaldt, (2004) Response of the inner radiation belt to the violent<br />

Sun-Earth connection events of October–November 2003, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L03S06,<br />

doi:10.1029/2004GL021502<br />

Lorentzen, K.R., Mazur J.E., Loper M.E., Fennell J.F., and Blake J.B. (2002) Multisatellite observations of<br />

MeV ion injections during storms, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 1231<br />

Parker E.N. (1960) Geomagnetic fluctuations and the form of the outer zone of the Van Allen radiation belt.<br />

J. Geophys. Res., 65, 3117-3126<br />

Pavlov N.N., Tverskaya L.V., Tverskoy B.A., Chuchkov E.A., (1993) Variations of the radiation belt particle<br />

flux during strong magnetic storm of March 24, 1991, Geomag. and aeronomie, 33(6), 41-45<br />

Slocum, P.L., Lorentzen K.R., Blake J.B., Fennell J.F., Hudson M.K, Looper M.D., Masson G.M., and<br />

Mazur J.E., (2002) Observations of ion injections during large solar particle events, AGU Fall Meeting,<br />

SH61A-0501<br />

Tverskoy B.A. (1965) Transport and acceleration of the charged particles in the Earths magnetosphere,<br />

Geomag. and aeronomy, 5, 793-809 (R)<br />

157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!