20.02.2013 Views

PROBLEMS OF GEOCOSMOS

PROBLEMS OF GEOCOSMOS

PROBLEMS OF GEOCOSMOS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference "Problems of Geocosmos" (St. Petersburg, Russia, 26-30 May 2008)<br />

1) diffusion of the filed line footpoints and 2) diffusion due to reconnection of open field lines with closed<br />

loops. They demonstrated that the rate of emergence of flux on the photosphere can control the magnitude of<br />

meridional flow. But, they found that the effect of diffusion due to magnetic reconnection is significant for<br />

the case of structured magnetic configuration (solar minimum conditions) and it small for the case of<br />

unstructured magnetic configuration (solar maximum conditions).<br />

Abramenko, Fisk, Yurchishin (2006) found that the coronal hole which forms after the polar magnetic field<br />

reversals (2002-2003) displays the local minimum for the rate of emergence of new magnetic flux. Dipole<br />

emergence rate in quiet sun exceeds twice that in Coronal holes.<br />

However, Hagenaar, Schrijver, and DeRosa (2008) have found that the emergence frequency of ephemeral<br />

regions does not depend on the presence of coronal holes. Instead,<br />

the frequency of ephemeral regions is<br />

found to depend on the degree of flux imbalance in the photosphere. This explains the observations by<br />

Abramenko, Fisk, & Yurchyshyn (2006) that fewer ephemeral regions emerge in quiet Sun inside coronal<br />

holes, than outside coronal holes.<br />

The surface-diffusion or transport models explain the polar magnetic field reversals as a result of turbulent<br />

diffusion,<br />

meridional circulation and differential rotation (e.g. Wang, Sheeley and Nash, 1991; Schrijver<br />

and Title 2001). Schrijver, De Rosa, Title (2002) also point out that the transport process leads to a transport<br />

of closed connections from equator to pole even as open solar flux is transported from the high latitudes to<br />

the equator. Fox, McIntosh and Wilson (1997) described the evolution of the large-scale fields and their<br />

association with polar coronal holes. Their question was whether the polar fields resulted from the local<br />

polar dynamo or not. There is no a certain answer to this question. But, Durrant, Turner and Wilson (2002)<br />

have observed that high-latitude flux emergence can affect the evolution of individual high-latitude plumes,<br />

but this flux does not seriously affect the whole reversal times of the polar magnetic field. However, the<br />

polar magnetic elements involve in the supergranular motion, solar rotation and reflect the subsurface<br />

gradient of angular velocity (Benevolenskaya, 2007).<br />

Conclusion<br />

The current and future high- (low-) resolution solar observations<br />

enable to investigate physical processes at<br />

the all levels on the Sun (convection zone, photosphe re,<br />

chromosphere, and corona), simultaneously. SOHO<br />

and others missions show how our Sun is variable. In this paper I reviewed the present results with focus on<br />

the solar cycle studies. Because of the next solar space laboratory, Solar Dynamics Laboratory (SDO), is<br />

coming to replace SOHO with a purpose to understand the nature of the solar cycle.<br />

References<br />

Abramenko, V. I., Fisk, L. A. and Yurchyshyn V. B. (2006), The rate of emergence of magnetic dipoles in<br />

Coronal holes and adjacent quiet-sun regions, ApJ, 641, L65-L68<br />

Aschwanden, M. J., Wuelser, L.-P, Nitta, N. V., Lemen, J.R. (2008a), First 3D Reconstructions of Coronal<br />

loops with the STEREO A and B Spacecraft.I. Geometry, ApJ, 679, 827-842<br />

Aschwanden, M. J., Nitta, N. V., Wuelser, L.-P., Lemen, J.R. (2008b), First 3D Reconstructions of Coronal<br />

loops with the STEREO A+B Spacecraft. II.Electron Density and Temperature<br />

Measurements, ApJ, 680<br />

(2), 1477-1495<br />

Babcock,<br />

H. W., and Babcock, H. D. (1955), The Sun’s magnetic field, 1952-1954, ApJ, 121, 349-366<br />

Babcock, H. W., Livingston W. C. (1958), Changes in the Sun’s polar magnetic field, Science, 127, 1058<br />

Babcock, H. D. (1959), The Sun’s polar magnetic field, ApJ, 130, 364-365<br />

Benevolenskaya, E. E., Hoeksema , J. T., Kosovichev, A. G. and Scherrer, P. H. (1999), The interaction of<br />

new and old magnetic fluxes at the beginning of solar cycle 23, ApJ, 517,<br />

L163-L166<br />

Benevolenskaya, E. E., Kosovichev, A. G. and Scherrer, P. H. (2001), Detection of high-latitude waves of<br />

solar coronal activity in extreme-ultraviolet data from the Solar and heliospheric observatory<br />

EUV<br />

imaging telescope, ApJ, 554, L107-L110<br />

Benevolenskaya,<br />

E. E., Kosovichev, A. G., Lemen, J. R., Scherrer, P. H., Slater, G. L. (2002), Large-scale<br />

solar coronal structures in soft X-ray and their<br />

relationship to the magnetic flux, ApJ, 571, L181-L185<br />

Benevolenskaya, E.E., (2007), Rotation of the magnetic elements in Polar Regions on the Sun, Astron.<br />

Nachr., 328 (10), 1016-1019<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!