English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Annex 3. Continued 0 | Annexes No use Tools Recreation Ornamental/ritual Miscellaneous*** Medicine Marketable item Light construction Hunting function Heavy construction Local name* Land Botanical name Family (Pahy/Vietnamese) type** unknown43 sp.43 Unknown43 Aruom 1 unknown45 sp.45 Unknown45 Mâl 1 unknown53 sp.53 Unknown53 A mư lân hát 2 unknown54 sp.54 Unknown54 - 2 unknown56 sp.56 Unknown56 A long pu lốt 2 unknown60 sp.60 Unknown60 Sắc 6 Basketry/rope Food Fodder Firewood *Further research is needed to improve the accuracy of the local names **Land types: 1=primary forest, 2=secondary forest, 3=plantation forest, 4=shrub land, 5=rice field, 6=garden ***Miscellaneous: fertilizer, support stalk for growth of pepper, fabric dye, shampoo, charcoal to blacken teeth, incense and furniture polish
The Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) is a leading international forestry research organization established in 1993 in response to global concerns about the social, environmental, and economic consequences of forest loss and degradation. CIFOR is dedicated to developing policies and technologies for sustainable use and management of forests, and for enhancing the well-being of people in developing countries who rely on tropical forests for their livelihoods. CIFOR is one of the 15 Future Harvest centres of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). With headquarters in Bogor, Indonesia, CIFOR has regional offices in Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cameroon and Zimbabwe, and it works in over 30 other countries around the world. Donors The Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) receives its major funding from governments, international development organizations, private foundations and regional organizations. In 2005, CIFOR received financial support from Australia, Asian Development Bank (ADB), Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement (CIRAD), Cordaid, Conservation International Foundation (CIF), European Commission, Finland, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Ford Foundation, France, German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ), German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), Indonesia, International Development Research Centre (IDRC), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO), Israel, Italy, The World Conservation Union (IUCN), Japan, Korea, Netherlands, Norway, Netherlands Development Organization, Overseas Development Institute (ODI), Peruvian Secretariat for International Cooperation (RSCI), Philippines, Spain, Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Switzerland, Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape, The Overbrook Foundation, The Nature Conservancy (TNC), Tropical Forest Foundation, Tropenbos International, United States, United Kingdom, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Bank, World Resources Institute (WRI) and World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF).
Page 1 and 2:
Biodiversity and Local Perceptions
Page 3 and 4:
Contents Acronyms and terms vii Ack
Page 5 and 6:
Tables and figures Tables Biodivers
Page 7 and 8:
Acronyms and terms asl above sea le
Page 9:
Acknowledgements We would like to e
Page 12 and 13:
| Research context and objectives M
Page 14 and 15:
| Methods the results of community
Page 16 and 17:
| Methods Figure 2. Working on samp
Page 18 and 19:
. Achievements During the project,
Page 20 and 21:
4.1. Previous conservation activiti
Page 22 and 23:
| Conservation context in Khe Tran
Page 24 and 25:
| Conservation context in Khe Tran
Page 26 and 27:
| Site description Sources: - Le Tr
Page 28 and 29:
| Site description Sources: - Depar
Page 30 and 31:
0 | Site description as a result of
Page 32 and 33:
| Site description Table 3. Income
Page 34 and 35:
| Site description Table 4. Identif
Page 36 and 37:
| Site description Dien, the govern
Page 38 and 39:
| Site description The process of c
Page 40 and 41:
0 | Local perceptions of the differ
Page 42 and 43:
Importance value (%) | Local percep
Page 44 and 45:
| Local perceptions of the differen
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
0 | Local perceptions of the differ
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
. Characterization of land types Ou
Page 58 and 59:
| Characterization of land types Th
Page 60 and 61:
0 | Characterization of land types
Page 62 and 63:
Relative basal area | Characterizat
Page 64 and 65:
| Characterization of land types Ta
Page 66 and 67: Individuals ha -1 | Characterizatio
Page 68 and 69: | Characterization of land types Su
Page 70 and 71: 0 | Ethno-botanical knowledge (dbh
Page 72 and 73: | Ethno-botanical knowledge Table 2
Page 74 and 75: | Ethno-botanical knowledge For foo
Page 76 and 77: | Ethno-botanical knowledge 8.7. Re
Page 78 and 79: | Local perspectives on conservatio
Page 80 and 81: 0 | Local perspectives on conservat
Page 82 and 83: | Conclusion and recommendations pa
Page 84 and 85: | Conclusion and recommendations Am
Page 86 and 87: | Conclusion and recommendations bu
Page 88 and 89: | Conclusion and recommendations Le
Page 90 and 91: Annex 1. Continued 0 | Annexes Plan
Page 92 and 93: Annex 1. Continued | Annexes Plant
Page 94 and 95: Annex 3. The botanical names, famil
Page 96 and 97: Annex 3. Continued | Annexes No use
Page 100 and 101: Annex 3. Continued 0 | Annexes No u
Page 110 and 111: Annex 3. Continued 00 | Annexes No
Page 118: Decisions on land use in Vietnam ar
show all

English 2.28MB - Center for International Forestry Research

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?